Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Analysis and Improvement of Public Enterprises' Record Management for the Utilization of Record as Legal Evidence

법적 증거로서 기록의 활용을 위한 공기업 기록관리 현황분석 및 개선방안

  • 박서인 (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과 기록관리학전공) ;
  • 김지현 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.04.21
  • Accepted : 2020.05.12
  • Published : 2020.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Organizations always face the risk of litigation; thus, they should actively prepare for it. In particular, public enterprises must respond to lawsuits carefully to avoid any management risk and possible damage of publicity. Given this, this study aims to identify the relationship between efficient litigation response and record management, determine problems related to record management while utilizing records as evidence, and propose measures to improve record management that uses records as legal evidence. For records to be deemed as legal evidence, RMS is essential to ensure authenticity. Moreover, the ability to secure potential evidence and awareness of the importance of records management needs to be validated. The Commission also stressed the importance of cooperation between archivists and the legal team to efficiently respond to lawsuits.

모든 조직에서 법적 분쟁은 심각한 위험요인으로 간주되며 업무수행 과정에서 언제든 발생할 수 있어 소송에 적극적으로 대비할 필요가 있다. 특히 기업인 동시에 공공기관인 공기업은 소송의 결과가 경영상 위험을 초래하지 않으면서 공공성을 저해하지 않도록 소송대응에 더욱 특별한 주의를 기울여야 한다. 따라서 본 연구는 효율적 소송대응과 체계적인 기록관리의 관계에 주목하여 공기업 기록관리 현황과 소송에서의 기록 활용 현황 파악과 법적 증거로서 기록 활용을 뒷받침하는 기록관리 개선방안 제안을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 문헌연구와 공기업 기록연구사 6명과 법무업무담당자 5명을 대상으로 심층면담을 수행하였다. 기록이 법적 증거로 활용되기 위해서는 기록의 진본성을 보장하고 잠재적 증거확보를 지원하는 체계적인 기록관리가 필수적이며 기록관리의 중요성에 대한 인식이 강화될 필요가 있다. 더불어 기록의 증거능력을 기반으로 하는 효율적인 소송대응을 위해 기록관리 부서와 법무팀 간 협력의 중요성을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ka, Jung-joon (2012). The study on the electronic evidence in civil procedure. Gachon Law Review, 5(1), 337-361.
  2. Kwag, Jeong (2016). A Study on improvement of public records management for the authenticity of electronic records. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate school of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
  3. Kwon, Yang-sub (2016). A study on the evidence of digital evidence in case studies. Review of KIISC, 26(5), 44-53. from. http://koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201633056056068.page
  4. Kwon, Oh-Geol (2011). The digital evidence and admissibility of evidence. IT&LAW Review, 5, 291-318.
  5. Kim, Young-gi (2011). A study on new method of decision about admissibility of digital evidence. Korean Association of Criminal Case Studies, 19, 509-539.
  6. Kim, Jun-ki (2014). Public enterprise policy theory. Seoul: Munusa.
  7. Kim, Ji-hyun (2013). A study on Records management of public enterprises supervised by national archives of Korea. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(3), 73-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.3.073
  8. Kim, Hyo-jin (2007). A study on requirements for presumption of authenticity for securing admissibility of evidence. Unpublished master's thesis, The Gruadate school of Archival Science Myoungji University.
  9. Future & Management Institute (2006). A glossary of economic terms. Seoul: Future & Management.
  10. Park, Min-sun (2011). A study on the relationship between record management and governmental performance of Korean public enterprise. Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Chung-ang University. Department of Records&Archives.
  11. Judicial Policy Research Institute (2015). Research on determining the admissibility of digital evidence. A research book of Judicial Policy Research Institute. 2015-08.
  12. Seol, Moon-won (2015). Building corporate information governance to prepare for litigation. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(4), 325-354. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.201512.325
  13. Seol, Moon-won (2019). Exploring the concepts of records as persistent representation of activities. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 59, 5-46. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.005
  14. Seol, Moon-won, & Lee, Haein (2016). Business records and information management as preparation for e-discovery risks. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(4), 7-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.007
  15. Won, Ku-hwan (2018). Public enterprise theory. Seoul: Daeyoung Munwhasa.
  16. Yoo, Mi-nyeon (2012). Study on factors affecting the performance of public enterprises: focusing on publicness and profitability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  17. Yoo, Hoon, (2005). Public enterprise theory. Seoul: Bobmunsa
  18. Yoon, Eun-ha (2019). A study on the concepts of record from a legal perspective. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 60, 89-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089
  19. Lee, Kyung-hoon (2005). Consideration and review on electronic records related legal system as evidence: focused on authenticity and admissibility of evidence. Unpublished master's thesis, The Graduate School of Hankook University of Foreign Studies.
  20. Lee, Sang-choel (2012). Understanding korean public enterprise. Seoul: Daeyoung Munwhasa.
  21. Lee, Jong-su (2009) Public administration dictionary. Seoul: Daeyoung Munwhasa.
  22. Choi, Sung-pil (2011). Comparative legal study on evidence of digital evidence. Overseas Training Prosecutor Research Papers, 26, 50-118.
  23. EDRM (2012). Information Governance Reference Model(IGRM). v3.0. http://www.edrm.net/projects/igrm
  24. ISO (2017). ISO 23081-1:2017 Information and documentation - Records management processes-Metadata for records-part 1: Principles
  25. ISO (2016). ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation - Records management-part 1: Concepts and principles
  26. InterPARES Authenticity Task Force (2002). Requirements for Assessing and Maintaining the Authenticity of Electronic Records.
  27. Hangmann, Jung (2013). Information governance beyond the buzz. Records Management Journal, 23(3), 228-240 https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2013-0008
  28. Miler, Laura (2000). Managing public sector records: Principles and Context. International Records Management Trust.
  29. Shepherd, Elizabeth, & Yeo, Geoffrey (2003). Managing records: A handbook of principle and practice. London: facet.
  30. Yeo, Geoffrey (2007). Concepts of record (1): Evidence, information, and persistent representations. The American Archivist 70(Fall/Winter2007), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
  31. 공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률.
  32. 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률.
  33. 형사소송법.
  34. 민사소송법.
  35. 전자거래기본법.
  36. 미국 연방증거규칙(Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, FRCP).
  37. 공공기관 경영정보 공개시스템. 검색일자: 2020. 4. 18. http://www.alio.go.kr/home.do
  38. 대한민국 법원 전자민원센터. 검색일자: 2020. 4. 18. https://www.scourt.go.kr/