Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education (대한지구과학교육학회지)

The Korean Society of Earth Science Education (대한지구과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Learning Effects and Difficulties of Role Play Activities to Learn Earth Rotation and Sun's Apparent Motion

지구 자전과 태양의 겉보기 운동 학습을 위한 역할놀이 활동의 학습 효과 및 학생들이 겪는 어려움

  • Received : 2020.03.26
  • Accepted : 2020.04.15
  • Published : 2020.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, to find out the learning effects and difficulties of role play activities to learn the earth's rotation and the sun's apparent motion, the degree of concept understanding through role play activities, difficulties arising from activities collected by interview, and eye movement during activities are analyzed. 22 fifth graders participated in this study and collected and analyzed experimental behaviors, post-interviews, and eye movement data during the role play of the students. The study found that students could explain the rotation and direction of the Earth through role play activities, but it was difficult to explain the apparent motion of the sun. Since it is difficult to perceive the sun's apparent motion through role play activities, the learning effect of the earth rotation role play activity is low.

본 연구에서는 지구 자전과 태양의 겉보기 운동을 학습하기 위한 역할놀이 활동의 학습 효과 및 어려움을 알아보기 위해서 역할 놀이 활동을 통한 개념 이해정도, 면담으로 수집한 활동에서 나타나는 어려움, 활동 중 시선이동을 분석하였다. 연구 참여자는 초등학교 5학년 학생 22명이며, 역할 놀이 중 실험 행동과 사후 면담, 시선이동자료를 수집하여 분석하였다. 연구결과, 학생들은 역할 놀이 활동을 통해 지구의 자전과 자전방향은 설명할 수 있지만 태양의 겉보기 운동을 설명하는 것은 어려워했다. 학생들은 역할 놀이 활동을 통해 태양의 겉보기 운동을 지각하기 어려워하기 때문에, 자전에 의해 나타나는 태양의 겉보기 운동 개념을 학습하기 위한 역할 놀이 활동은 학습 효과가 낮다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수정, 김형범, 한신, 정진우(2012). 초등학생의 공간능력 수준차이에 따른 지구자전에 관한 개념 분석. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2012.5.1.020
  2. 양일호, 정진우, 허명, 김석민(2006). 실험수업 유형 분류틀 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 342-355.
  3. 이경훈, 임종옥(2010). 9학년 학생의 공간 능력 차이에 따른 지구자전 개념의 획득. 한국지구과학회지, 31(3), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.3.267
  4. 이용섭(2013). 초등과학의 '지구와 우주'영역에서 초등예비교사의 지식수준과 공간지각 능력과의 관계. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(3), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2013.6.3.252
  5. 정진우, 정재구, 문상연, 문병찬(2004). 흥미와 학습양식에 따른 고등학교 1학년 학생들의 지구의 자전 관련 개념. 한국지구과학회지, 25(7), 532-544.
  6. 하옥선, 이용복(1997). 지구 자전에 대한 초등학교 학생들의 개념 유형에 관한 연구. 초등과학교육, 16(1), 103-122.
  7. 한제준, 채동현(2018). 학교 급별에 적합한 '지구의 모양' 실험에 대한 예비교사의 인식 연구. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.2.107
  8. Begel, A., Garcia, D. D., & Wolfman, S. A. (2004). Kinesthetic learning in the classroom, SIGCSE '04: Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. Norfolk, VA, ACM Press, 183-184.
  9. Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and Earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402-414. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.402
  10. Chinnici, J. P., Yue, J. W., & Torres, K. M. (2004). Students as human chromosomes in role-playing mitosis & meiosis. The American Biology Teacher, 66(1), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0035:SAHCIR]2.0.CO;2
  11. Chiras, A. (2008). Day/night cycle: Mental models of primary school children. Science Education International, 19(1), 65-83.
  12. Cole, M., Cohen, C., Wilhelm, J., & Lindell, R. (2018). Spatial thinking in astronomy education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010139
  13. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  14. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  15. Goldstein, E. B., & Brockmole, J., 곽호완 등 역 (2016). Sensation and perception. New York: Brooks Cole. 감각 및 지각심리학, 서울: 박학사.
  16. Hobson, S. M., Trundle, K. C., & Sackes, M. (2010). Using a planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9189-8
  17. Jee, B. D., & Anggoro, F. K. (2019). Relational scaffolding enhances children’s understanding of scientific models. Psychological Science, 30(9), 1287-1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619864601
  18. Liversedge, S., Gilchrist, I., & Everling, S. (2011). The oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. McSharry, G., & Jones, S. (2000). Role-play in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 82(298), 73-82.
  20. Morrow, C. A. (2000). Kinesthetic astronomy: The sky time lesson. The Physics Teacher, 38(4), 252-253. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.880520
  21. Padalkar, S., & Ramadas, J. (2011). Designed and spontaneous gestures in elementary astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1703-1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.520348
  22. Plummer, J. D. (2009). Early elementary students’ development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20280
  23. Plummer, J. D. (2014). Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.869039
  24. Plummer, J. D., Kocareli, A., & Slagle, C. (2014). Learning to explain astronomy across moving frames of reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1083-1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.843211
  25. Plummer, J. D., Wasko, K. D., & Slagle, C. (2011). Children learning to explain daily celestial motion: Understanding astronomy across moving frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 33(14), 1963-1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.537707
  26. Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C
  27. Richards, T. (2012). Using kinesthetic activities to teach Ptolemaic and Copernican retrograde motion. Science & education, 21(6), 899-910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9265-8
  28. Rodrigues, P., & Rosa, P. J. (2017). Eye-tracking as a research methodology in educational context: A spanning framework. In Christopher, W., Frank, S., & Bradley, M., (Eds), pp. 1-26. Eye Tracking Technology Applications in Educational Research.
  29. Ross, P. M., Tronson, D. A., & Ritchie, R. J. (2008). Increasing conceptual understanding of glycolysis & the Krebs cycle using role-play. The American Biology Teacher, 70(3), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.2307/30163230
  30. Sharp, J. G., & Grace, M. (2004). Anecdote, opinion and whim: Lessons in curriculum development from primary science education in England and Wales. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152042000247981
  31. Slater, T. F., & Gelderman, R. (2017). Addressing students' misconceptions about eclipses. The Physics Teacher, 55(5), 314-315. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4981046
  32. Trout, K. P., & Gaston, C. A. (2001). Active-learning physics experiments using the Tarzan swing. The Physics Teacher, 39(3), 160-163. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1364061
  33. Valanides, N., Gritsi, F., Kampeza, M., & Ravanis, K. (2000). Changing pre-school children's conceptions of the day/night. International Journal of Early Years Education, 8(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/096697600111725
  34. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 123-183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1801_4
  35. Yu, K. C., Sahami, K., Sahami, V., & Sessions, L. C. (2015). Using a digital planetarium for teaching seasons to undergraduates. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 2(1), 33-50.