DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Resin on Antimicrobial Properties of Calibration Devices.

교정장치의 항균에 따른 레진상의 특성

  • Jo, Jeong-Ki (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Chungbuk Health & Science University)
  • 조정기 (충북보건과학대학교 치기공과)
  • Received : 2020.02.21
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.04.28

Abstract

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is concerned with promoting oral infection due to its low antibacterial activity. To overcome this, the nanoparticles of Ag-MSN, nGO, and CNP were mixed with MMA liquid in a weight ratio of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0% compared to resin powder using Orthocryl from Dentarum, a calibration resin, and then instructed by the manufacturer. Accordingly, a specimen for calibration was prepared by mixing PMMA: MMA (1.2: 1) ratio, and physical properties of the calibration resin, antifungal experiments, and statistical analysis were performed. As a result of antibacterial experiments, the antibacterial properties of Ag-MSN increased. In nGO, the antibacterial adhesive effect increased hydrophilicity, not a change in surface roughness. The higher the CNP concentration, the higher the antibacterial activity. This suggests its potential usefulness as an antibacterial dental material for orthodontic devices and temporary restorations.

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)는 치과 교정장치 재료로 사용해 왔다. 하지만 낮은 항균력으로 인한 구강감염을 촉진시킬 염려가 있다. 본 연구에서는 이를 극복하기 위하여 최근 발표된 Ag-MSN, graphene-oxide nanosheets(nGO), Cerium nanoparticle(CNP)의 나노입자를 교정레진인 Dentarum 회사의 Orthocryl를 사용하여 레진 파우더 대비 중량비 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0%를 MMA 액에 혼합한 후 제조사의 지시에 따라 PMMA 분말: MMA 액 (1.2 : 1) 비율로 혼합하여 교정용 시편을 제작하였고 교정용 레진 항진균 실험, 통계분석을 하였다. 항균실험을 한 결과 교정용 PMMA레진이 Ag-MSN을 함유할 때 항(진)균적 성질이 증가하였다. nGO를 PM에 넣으면 표면이 거칠어지고 친수성을 높일 수 있었고 항균 접착제 효과가 표면 거칠기의 변화가 아닌 친수성이 증가하였다. CNP 농도가 높을수록 항부착 성질이 최대 60%까지 관찰되었다. 나노입자함유 교정용 레진은 항균효과가 나타남을 알 수 있었다. 이는 의치, 치열 교정 장치 및 임시 수복물에 대한 유망한 항균 치과 재료로서의 잠재적 유용성을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. M. Lino, C. S. O. Paulo, A. C. Vale, M. F. Vaz & L. S. Ferreira. (2013) Antifungal activity of dental resins containing amphotericin B-conjugated nanoparticles. Dent Mater. 29(10), :e252-e62. DOI : 10.1016 / j.dental.2013.07.023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.023
  2. A. Peutzfeldt. Resin composites in dentistry : the monomer systems Eur J Oral Sic. 1997;105:97-116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.
  3. Ic RB, Ozturk F, Ates B, Malkoc MA, Kelestemur U. Level of residual monomerreleased from orthodontic acrylic materials. J Angle Orthod. 2014;Mar6. DOI: 10.2319/060713-435.1.
  4. G. S. Lee. A study on flexural strength according to work conditions of Polymerizingorthodontic acrylic resin. Bulletin of Dongnam Health College. 2001;19:213-221. DOI.org/10.1002/app.29629.
  5. H. S. Noh, J. M. Kim, S. Kim & T. S. Jeong. Effect of curing conditions on the monomerelution of orthodontic acrylic resin. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2008;35:477-484. DOI.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.3.259.
  6. Y. H. Ko, G. R. Kim Y. U. Yi &, H. H. Lee. Effect of curing methods on the flexural strengthof acrylic denture resins. J Korean Soc Dental Mater. 2013;40(4):289-295. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2014.027.
  7. J. Kenneth. Anusavice. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed;2006:143-169, 734-735.
  8. U. Kedjarune, N. Charoenworaluk, S. Koontongkaew. Release of methyl methacrylate- 31 -from heat-cured and autopolymerized resins: Cytotoxicity testing related to residualmonomer. J Aust Dent. 1999;44:25-30. DOI.org/10.4012/dmj.26.296.
  9. J. H. Jorge, E. T. Giampaolo, C. E. Vergani , A. L. Machado, A. C. Pavarina & I. Z. Carlos. (2006) Effct of post-polymerization heat treatments on the cytotoxicity of two denture base acrylic resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 14(3):203-7. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572006000300011.
  10. J. H. Lee. et al. (2016). Development of long-term antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) by incorporating mesoporous silica nanocarriers. Dent Mater 32, 1564-1574 DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.001.
  11. J. K. Jo et al.Rechargeable microbial anti-adhesive polymethyl methacrylate incorporating silver sulfadiazine-loaded mesoporous silica nanocarriers. Dent Mater; DOI.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.009.
  12. W. Wang, S. Liao, Y. Zhu, M. Liu, Q. Zhao & Y. Fu. (2015) Recent Applications of Nanomaterials in Prosthodontics. J Nanomater. 2015:11. DOI.; 10.1155/2015/408643.
  13. G. C. Padovani, V. P. Feitosa, S. Sauro, F. R. Tay, G. Duran & A. J. Paula et al. Advances in Dental Materials through Nanotechnology: Facts, Perspectives and Toxicological Aspects. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(11):621-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.005.
  14. Chen J, Peng H, Wang X, Shao F, Yuan Z, Han H.(2014) Graphene oxide exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacterial phytopathogens and fungal conidia by intertwining and membrane perturbation. Nanoscale. 6(3):1879-89. DOI: 10.1039/c3nr04941.
  15. Chen H, Wang B, Gao D, Guan M, Zheng L, Ouyang H, et al.(2013) Broad-spectrum antibacterial activity of carbon nanotubes to human gut bacteria. Small. 9(16):2735-46. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201202792.
  16. Morimune S, Nishino T, Goto T.(2012) Ecological Approach to Graphene Oxide Reinforced Poly (methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 4(7):3596-601.. DOI: 10.1021/am3006687.
  17. Sharpe E., Andreescu D., Andreescu S. Oxidative Stress: Diagnostics, Prevention, and Therapy. American Chemical Society; Washington, DC, USA: 2011. Artificial nanoparticle antioxidants; pp. 235-253.DOI: 10.1021/bk-2011-1083.
  18. J. S. Kim, E Kuk, K. N. Yu, J. H. Kim, S. J. Park & H. J. Lee. et al.(2007) Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 3(1):95-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.12.001.
  19. Bai S, Wang C, Jiang W, Du N, Li J, Du J, et al. Etchingapproach to hybrid structures of PtPd nanocages andgraphene for efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalysts.Nano Res 2015;8:2789-99. DOI:10.1007/s12274-015-0755-5.
  20. Khodadadi Dizaji A, Mortaheb HR, Mokhtarani B.Preparation of supported catalyst by adsorption ofpolyoxometalate on graphene oxide/reduced grapheneoxide. Mater Chem Phys 2017;199:424-34. DOI.org/10.1021/ie303220.