Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Effect of the Havruta Method in Engineering Education

공학교육에서 하브루타 수업방식의 효과 분석

  • Eom, Mi Ri (Center for Teaching and Learning, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Young In (Department of Electrical and Biological Physics, Kwangwoon University)
  • 엄미리 (고려대학교 교수학습개발원) ;
  • 이영인 (광운대학교 전자바이오물리학과)
  • Received : 2019.12.02
  • Accepted : 2020.01.20
  • Published : 2020.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the change of engineering students' competencies through the havruta class. In the havruta class, engineering students' competencies were compared with pre-test and post-test. The research tool was developed by selecting learning readiness, academic self-efficacy, and communication ability as the learner's competence in the havruta class. Finally, 105 data were analyzed with SPSS 21.0 for windows. First, there was a statistically significant difference in learning readiness. Second, there was no statistically significant difference in academic self-efficacy. Third, there was a statistically significant difference in communication ability. It was found that there was a positive change of competencies in learning readiness ability and communication ability in the havruta class. Although the findings are difficult to generalize to all majors, these results will be a useful basis for instructors who want to apply the havruta class.

본 연구의 목적은 공대 대학수업에 하브루타 방식을 적용하여 실제적으로 학습자의 역량에 변화가 있는지를 탐색하는 것으로, 대학수업에서의 효과적 운영을 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 한다. <대학물리및실험2>를 수강하는 105명의 학습자들을 대상으로 하였고, 선행연구들을 탐색하여 하브루타 수업에서의 학습자 역량으로 학습준비도능력, 학업적 자기효능감, 의사소통능력을 선정하고 연구도구를 활용하여 실험을 진행하였다. 연구는 하브루타 수업적용을 위한 수업설계, 실험설계, 사전검사, 실험처치, 사후검사 순으로 진행하고 SPSS 21.0 for window를 활용하여 사전-사후 학습자 역량 변화를 비교·분석하였다. 첫째, 학습준비도능력은 사전-사후검사를 비교한 결과 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있으며, 특히 하위역량 중 학습에 대한 애착, 학습기회에 대한 개방성, 학습에 대한 주도성/독립성에서 긍정적인 역량 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 학업적 자기효능감은 사전-사후검사를 비교한 결과 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 의사소통능력은 사전-사후검사를 비교한 결과 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있으며, 특히 하위역량 중 주도적 의사소통에서 긍정적인 역량 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 도출된 연구결과는 교수자 중심의 교육에서 탈피하여 공대 수업에 학생중심의 하브루타 방식을 적용하여 효과를 탐색한 것으로, 공대 수업이나 대학수업에 하브루타를 적용하고 싶은 교수자나 수업설계자들에게 좋은 지침 및 기초자료가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Kember. (2009). Promoting student-centered forms of learning across an entire university. Higher Education, 58(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9177-6
  2. S. J. Lee. (2017). A Study on the Application of Harbructure Discussion. Unpublished master thesis, Daejin University.
  3. Y. K. Kim. (2016). Development of a flipped-learning instructional model based on activity theory for higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University.
  4. Y. S. Yang, H. O. Heo & Y. S. Kim. (2014). Effects of students' efficacy beliefs and scaffolding on learning engagement and achievement in team project-based learning. The Journal of educational information and media, 20(4), 495-519.
  5. K. W. Chang. (2011). A Model of Action Learning Program Design in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 475-505. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.27.3.475
  6. C. Reigeluth. (2012). Instructional theory and technology for the new paradigm of education. RED, Revista de Educacion a distancia, 32, 1-18.
  7. S. D. Kim & K. T. Seo. (2018). Case Study on the Application of Lesson Based of Havruta Learning. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(3), 267-277.
  8. B. S. Jang. (2018). A Meta-Analysis for the Effects of Havruta Learning in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 1-24.
  9. E. Holzer. (2015). Welcoming Opposition: Havruta Learning and Montaigne's The Art of Discussion. Journal of Moral Education, 44(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2014.1002462
  10. E. S. Kang. (2017). The Application Process and Its Effectiveness of Havruta Teaching Methods in College Physical Education. Korean Journal of Sports Science, 26(2), 675-685. https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2017.04.26.2.675
  11. S. B. Kim. (2015). To explore the possibility of a shift in college teaching methods through the adaptation of havruta-teaching methods-centered way. Theology and Ministry, 44, 389-415.
  12. M. R. Eom & C. H. Kim. (2018). A case study on the applied havruta method in the Chinese class as the university liberal arts subjects. Korean Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 36, 417-441. https://doi.org/10.18213/jkccl.2018.36.1.014
  13. Y. J. Hur. (2016). The effect of havruta teaching methods on university students individual and group creativity. Korean Journal of General Education 10(3), 73-106.
  14. E. H. Kwak. (2017). The effects of the science class based on havruta learning on the scientific learning motivation and scientific attitudes of elementary school students. Unpublished master thesis. Busan National University, Busan.
  15. S. Y. Park. (2017). The effects of havruta Korean classes on 4 th graders' the ability to generate questions and to read. Unpublished master thesis. Daegu National University, Daegu.
  16. M. J. Shim. (2017). Analysis of communication characteristics of elementary mathematical gifted students in the havruta learning method. Unpublished master thesis. Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon.
  17. Y. J. Kim. (2018). The Effect of Classes Applied to the Havruta Method on Academic Achievement and Learning Attitude. Unpublished master thesis. Daejin University, Pocheon.
  18. S. Y. Lee. (2017). An analysis on the influence of havruta on the improvement of math communication ability in elementary school. Unpublished master thesis. Chinju National University, Chinju.
  19. E. J. Kang. (2017). The effects of havruta class on high school students' geographical attitude and academic achievement. Unpublished master thesis. Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  20. J. S. Kim & T. W. Lee. (2018). Improving computational thinking by creating apps that combine havruta. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference 26(1), 223-226.
  21. B. J. Rho & J. Y. Jung. (2019). The effects of the inventive program of practical arts education with habruta on the inventive attitude and problem solving ability. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 32(1), 25-42.
  22. J. E. Yu. (2018). The effect of havruta method on academic attitude and performance of low level students-focusing on after-school classes in the first year of middle school. Unpublished master thesis. Kookmin University, Seoul.
  23. H. G. Jeon. (2016). An analysis on the effects of havruta learning on students' attitude and achievement in mathematics. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Pusan National University, Busan.
  24. S. K. Choi, H. M. Kang, M. J. Kim, Y. H. Ahn, & T. H. Lee. (2016). A Study on the Havruta Teaching Method for Motivation. Paper presented at the meeting of The Korean Association of General Education, 517-537.
  25. M. R. Eom & I. W. Park. (2011). The study of learnerrelated variables influencing to the effect of reflective journal writing on learning in e portfolio. Korean Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 213-246. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.27.1.213
  26. O. Kent. (2010). A Theory of Havruta Learning. Journal of Jewish Education, 76, 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2010.501499
  27. O. Kent & A. Cook. (2012). Havruta Inspired Pedagogy: Fostering An Ecology of Learning for Closely Studying Texts with Others. Retrieved Oct. 27, 2001 from http://bir.brandeis.edu/bitstream/handle/10192/33194/Kent%20and%20Cook%20Inspired%20Pedagogy-Fostering%20an%20Ecology%20of%20Learning%20for%20Closely%20Studying%20Texts%20with%20Others.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  28. H. Go, H. D. Min & J. S. Song. (2017). The Effects of Question-Centered Havruta Lesson on the Creative Personality and Problem-Solving Ability of Preservice Early Childhood Teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(13), 253-278.
  29. S. S. Jeon & D. I. Yang. (2014). Havruta for how to ask questions. Seoul: Lionbooks.
  30. S. S. Jeon. (2014). The best way to study. Seoul: Kyunghyangbp.
  31. S. H. Lim. (2019). The Effects of Adult Nursing Education on the Critical Thinking Disposition, Learning Commitment, and Learning Satisfaction of Nursing Students Using the Havruta Learning Method. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 20(7), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.7.547
  32. I. S. Kim & J. H. Lee. (2004). Analysis of self-directed learning readiness for undergraduate students. The journal of educational theory and practice, 13(3), 129-154.
  33. D. H. Kim. (2017). Investigating the Educational Effects of Flipped learning in a College Setting. Unpublished master thesis, Ehwa womans University.
  34. S. J. Lee, Y. K. Chang, H. N. Lee & K. Y. Park. (2003). Study on the development of life-skills : communication, problem solving, and self-directed learning. Research report RR 2003-15-3, Korean Educational Development Institute.
  35. L. Como & E. B. Mandinach. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529266