지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)

한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

최고 경영자의 인구통계학적 특성이 조직 디커플링 행위에 미치는 영향

Effects of CEO's Demographic Characteristics on Decoupling

  • 김용 (서울시립대 경영대학) ;
  • 최영준 (서울시립대 경영대학)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.25
  • 심사 : 2020.02.24
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The majority of research on institutional theory suggests that the new institutional practices presented by national governments and expert groups is a legitimate demand by society, and that the organization is a passive actor that accepts it. However, individual organizations often perform so-called decoupling acts that run their organizations in their own way instead of following the way the system requires, despite the pressures of a strong institutional environment. In this study, the decoupling behavior of these organizations can be varied by the characteristics of the highest decision maker in the organization based on the upper-echelon theory(UET) even if there is no difference in pressure experienced by individual organizations, and their relationship is empirically analyzed among secondary educational institutions that are relatively strongly regulated by the government. According to the analysis of 192 high schools in Korea, the female principal, the younger the principal, and the higher the educational background, the more likely they are to engage in decoupling behavior that are different from the intent and content of government policies. Therefore, from the results of this study, meaningful theoretical and practical implications can be provided for researchers and managers in the field of knowledge management research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김경회, 박수정 2012. "학교자율화에 대한 교육감과 학교장의 인식 분석," 지방행정연구 (26:1), pp. 249-270.
  2. 김동수, 차현진, 박상찬 2017. "신제도주의 조직이론의 과제와 전망: 제도적 디커플링 연구를 중심으로," 인사조직연구 (25:3), pp. 121-150.
  3. 김성열, 김훈호 2015. "고등학교 체제의 다양화: 양상과 성과, 그리고 과제," 교육연구와 실천 (81), pp. 27-56.
  4. 김이경, 김도기, 김갑성 2008. "우수 학교장의 리더십 특성에 관한 질적 사례 연구," 교육행정학연구 (26:3), pp. 325-350.
  5. 김재웅 2006. "학교운영 자율성 및 다양성 제고를 위한 이론적 탐색," 지방교육경영 (11), pp. 21-47.
  6. 노태희, 권혁순, 김혜경, 박승재 2000. "제6차 고등학교 과학 교육과정과 실천에 대한 과학 교사의 인식 조사," 한국과학교육 (20:1), pp. 20-28.
  7. 민무숙, 허현란 2000. "여교장의 지도성 효과 및 특성에 관한 연구," 한국여성개발원 연구보고서 (220:4), pp. 1-51.
  8. 민용성 2011. "교과 교육내용의 적합성 준거 개발," 학습자중심교과교육연구 (11), pp. 19-41.
  9. 박노윤 2004. "지식경영일반: 조직의 결합능력과 사회적 자본," 지식경영 학술심포지움, (12), pp. 271-303.
  10. 박상완 2008. "학교장의 지도성에 관한 국내 연구 동향 분석(1998-2008)," 교육행정학연구 (21:2), pp. 129-157.
  11. 박상완 2017. "우리나라 여교장의 특성분석," 교육행정학연구 (34:1), pp. 233-261.
  12. 박상찬, 차현진 2017. "지식창출과 활용의 괴리: 녹색기술인증의 제도론적 분석," 지식경영연구 (18:1), pp. 117-138. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2017.18.1.006
  13. 박수정, 박선주 2014. "학교장의 특성 및 학교경영 활동이 일반계 고등학생의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향," 교육평가연구 (27), pp. 1127-1155.
  14. 박철순, 유진탁 1999. "전략결정요인으로서의 최고 경영자: Upper Echelons 이론 및 자유 재량이론의 통합모형," 전략경영연구 (2:1), pp. 147-168.
  15. 선우희연, 현지원 2017. "최고경영자 연령과 조세회피수준의 관계," 회계정보연구 (35:3), pp. 213-241.
  16. 이경묵 1999. "제도론: 주요 이슈와 미래의 연구방향," 경영논집 (33), pp. 382-409, 서울: 서울대학교경영대학.
  17. 이경묵 2019. "우리나라 제도이론 연구에 대한 비판적 고찰과 미래 연구 방향," 경영학연구 (48:1), pp. 1-32.
  18. 이기종 2009. "국가수준 학업성취도 평가체제의 쟁점과 대안," 교육논총 (29:1), pp. 21-33.
  19. 이준영, 정지영 2011. "남성과 여성의 투자위험 감수성향 차이에 관한 연구," Family and Environment Research (49:10), pp. 1-13.
  20. 인천시교육청 2014. "2014년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 시행 관련 특정감사결과," 민원 및 언론보도 사항.
  21. 임준희 2006. "고교 평준화 정책과 교육이해관계자들의 정책연합," 교육행정학연구 (24:2), pp. 125-148.
  22. 조대연, 권현정 2008. "비영리조직의 지식경영 현황 및 비영리조직간 지식경영 핵심성공요인," 지식경영연구 (9:2), pp. 35-61.
  23. 조항로, 김병찬 2013. "학교자율경영제 관점에서 본 자율형 사립고 운영과정에서의 동형화와 디커플링 현상 분석: A 자율형 사립고 사례," 교육행정학연구 (31:4), pp. 227-258.
  24. 조혜진, 안혜성 2019. "기업의 해외시장 집중화가 애널리스트 성과예측정보에 미치는 영향: 최고경영자 특성의 조절효과," 지식경영연구 (20:1), pp. 195-213. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2019.20.1.009
  25. 채희원, 송재용 2009. "최고경영진의 인구통계학적 특성이 하이테크 기업의 기술적 혁신에 미치는 영향," 전략경영연구 (12:2), pp. 83-104.
  26. 최만기, 신창호 2003. "자원기반이론과 제도화이론에 기초한 연구개발집단의 지식경영 연구모형," 지식경영연구 (4:2), pp. 35-53.
  27. 최미섭 2017. "여성 학교장의 리더십 유형 및 특성 분석," 한국교원교육연구 (34:2), pp. 111-137. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2017.34.2.111
  28. 최영준, 류준열 2017. "여성성이 은행혁신성에 미치는 영향-고객관리와 조직학습을 중심으로," 인적자원관리연구 (24:1), pp. 77-95.
  29. 최윤정, 김지은 2012. "학교장의 경영가치 유형에 따른 학교장 지도성 및 학교 문제행동과 학교 효과성과의 관계: 예방상담학적 관점," 상담학연구 (13:3), pp. 1315-1336.
  30. 하영범, 이성희 2014. "CEO 특성이 R&D투자정도에 미치는 영향," 국제회계연구 (58:12), pp. 103-125.
  31. 한유경, 김은영, 윤수경 2011. "학교장 성별에 따른 중학교 학생의 학업성취도 차이," 교육행정학연구 (29:3), pp. 329-350.
  32. 홍창남, 정수현, 김도기, 송경오, 이쌍철, 김훈호 2011. "자율형 공립고등학교 운영 실태 및 개선방안 탐색," 교육행정학연구 (29:4), pp. 225-251.
  33. Alutto, J. A. and Hrebiniak, L. G. 1975. "Research on commitment to employing organizations: Preliminary findings on a study of managers graduating from engineering and MBA programs," In annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans.
  34. Bantel, K. A., and Jackson, S. E. 1989. "Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?," Strategic Management Journal (10:S1), pp. 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709
  35. Barker III, V. L. and Mueller, G. C. 2002. "CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending," Management Science (48:6), pp. 782-801. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187
  36. Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
  37. Boeker, W. 1997. "Strategic change: The inf luence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth," Academy of Management Journal (40:1), pp. 152-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/257024
  38. Boxenbaum, E., and Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2, 79-104.
  39. Carlsson, G. and Karlsson, K. 1970. "Age, Cohorts and the Generation of Generations," American Sociological Review (35:4), pp. 710-718. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093946
  40. Carroll, G. R. and Delacroix, J. 1982. "Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: An ecological approach," Administrative Science Quarterly (27:2), pp. 169-198. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392299
  41. Child, J. 1974. "Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance part I," Journal of Management Studies (11:3), pp. 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1974.tb00693.x
  42. Chown, S. M. 1960. "The Wesley rigidity inventory: A factor-analytic approach," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (61), pp. 491-494. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042403
  43. Collins, O. and Moore, D. G. 1970. The organization makers, Newyork: Appleton-Century-Croft.
  44. Crilly, D., Zollo, M., and Hansen, M. T. 2012. "Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures," Academy of Management Journal ( 55:6), pp. 1429-1448. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0697
  45. Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., and Roy, J. P. 2007. "The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective," Strategic Management Journal (28:2), pp. 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.577
  46. Dearborn, D. C. and Simon, H. A. 1958. "Selective perceptions: A note on t he departmental identification of executives," Sociometry (21), pp. 140-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785898
  47. Deephouse, D. L. 1996. "Does Isomorphism Legitimate?," Academy of Management Journal (39:4), pp. 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.5465/256722
  48. Deephouse, D. L. 1999. "To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance," Strategic Management Journal (20:2) pp. 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<147::AID-SMJ11>3.0.CO;2-Q
  49. DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields," American Sociological Review (48:2), pp. 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  50. Dollinger, M. J. 1984. "Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance," Academy of Management Journal (27), pp. 351-368. https://doi.org/10.2307/255929
  51. Douglas, M. 1986. How institutions think, Syracuse University Press.
  52. Fiss, P. C., and Zajac, E. J. 2006. "The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling," Academy of Management Journal (49:6), pp. 1173-1193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478255
  53. Geletkanycz, M. A. and Hambrick, D. C. 1997. "The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance," Administrative Science Quarterly (42:4), pp. 654-681. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393653
  54. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice, Harvard University Press.
  55. Grant, R. M. 1996. "Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm," Strategic Management Journal (17:S2), pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
  56. Hambrick, D. C. and Finkelstein, S. 1987. "Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes," Research in Organizational Behavior (9), pp. 369-406.
  57. Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., and Fredrickson, J. W. 1993. "Top Executive commitment to the status quo: some tests of its determinants," Strategic Management Journal (14:6), pp. 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140602
  58. Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. 1984. "Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers," Academy of Management Review (9:2), pp. 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
  59. Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. 1977. "The Population Ecology of Organizations," American Journal of Sociology (82:5), pp. 929-964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
  60. Hart, P. and Mellons, J. 1970. "Management youth and company growth: A correlation?," Management Decision (4:1), pp. 50-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb000925
  61. Helen, M. M. and Susan, M. P. 2003. "Principal Leadership and School Performance: An Integration of Transformational and Instructional Leadership," Educational Administration Quarterly (39:3), pp. 370-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412
  62. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., and Paetzold, R. L. 2000. "The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change," Journal of Management Studies (37:2), pp. 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179
  63. Hitt, M. A., and Barr, S. H. 1989. "Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing," Journal of Applied Psychology (74:1), pp. 1-53.
  64. Hitt, M. A. and Tyler, B. B. 1991. "Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives," Strategic Management Journal (12:5), pp. 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120502
  65. Hornik, J. and Schlinger, M. J. 1981. "Allocation of time to the mass media," Journal of Consumer Research (7:4), pp. 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1086/208824
  66. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Bettis, R. A., and De Porras, D. A. 1987. "Strategy formulation processes: Differences in perceptions of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level," Strategic Management Journal (8:5), pp. 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080506
  67. Judge, W. Q. and Zeithaml, C. P. 1992. "Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process," Academy of Management Journal (35:4), pp. 766-794. https://doi.org/10.2307/256315
  68. Kanter, R. M. 1977. "Some Effects of Proportions in Group Life: Skewed Sex Pations and Presponses to Token Women," American Journal of Sociology (82), pp. 965-990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425
  69. Kaplan, S. N., and Stromberg, P. 2009. "Leveraged buyouts and private equity," Journal of Economic Perspectives (23:1), pp. 121-46. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.121
  70. Kimberly, J. R. and Evanisko, M. J. 1981. "Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations," Academy of Management Journal (24), pp. 689-713. https://doi.org/10.2307/256170
  71. Kohlberg, L. 1981. The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice (Essays on moral development, Vol. 1), San Francisco: Haiper & Row.
  72. Lampe, A. 2001. "Review of the Book Gender in the Workplace: A Case Study Approach," Gender, Work and Organization (8:3), pp. 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00136
  73. Meyer, J. W. 2008. "Reflections on institutional theories of organizations," The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, pp. 790-811.
  74. Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. 1977. "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony," American Journal of Sociology (83:2), pp. 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  75. Meyer, J. W. and Scott, W. R. 1983. "Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government," Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality, pp. 199-215.
  76. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., and Coleman, H. J. 1978. "Organizational strategy, structure, and process," Academy of Management Review (3:3), pp. 546-562. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755
  77. Mizruchi, M. S. and Fein, L. C. 1999. "The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism," Administrative Science Quarterly (44:4), pp. 653-683. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667051
  78. Oliver, C. 1991. "Strategic Response to Institution Processes," Academy of Management Review (16:1), pp. 145-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
  79. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations, New York: Harper & Row.
  80. Prendergast, C., and Stole, L. 1996. "Impetuous youngsters and jaded old-timers: Acquiring a reputation for learning," Journal of Political Economy (104:6), pp. 1105-1134. https://doi.org/10.1086/262055
  81. Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., and Mattis, M. 1998. "Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breakin the glass ceiling," Academy of Management Executive (12:1), pp. 28-42.
  82. Rogers, E. M. and Shoemaker, P. 1971. Communication of Innovations, New York: Free Press.
  83. Rowan, B. 1982. "Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools," Administrative Science Quarterly (37:2), pp. 259-279. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392303
  84. Scott, W. R. 1981. Organizations : Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5thed),Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  85. Serf ling, M. A. 2014. "CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies," Journal of Corporate Finance (25), pp. 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013
  86. Shakeshaft, C. 1989. Women in educational administration, Sage Publications, Corwin Press, 2455 Teller Road, Newbury Park, CA 91320.
  87. Steven, J. M., Beyer, J. M., and Trice, H. M. 1978. "Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment," Academy of Management Journal (21:3), pp. 380-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/255721
  88. Taylor, R. 1975. "Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision-making performance," Academy of Management Journal (18:1), pp. 74-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/255626
  89. Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. 2011. "Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations' compliance with reporting standards?," Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (40:1), pp. 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009355061
  90. Vroom, V. H. and Pahl, B. 1971. "Relationship between age and risk taking among managers," Journal of Applied Psychology (55:5), pp. 399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031776
  91. Wahlstrom, K. L. and Louis, K. S. 2008. "How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility," Educational Administration Quarterly (44:4), pp. 458-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
  92. Westphal, J. D. and Zajac, E. J. 1993. "SUBSTANCE AND SYMBOLISM IN CEOS' LONG-T ERM INCENTIVE PLANS," In Academy of Management Proceedings (1993:1), pp. 232-236. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  93. Westphal, J. D. and Zajac, E. J. 2001. "Decoupling Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase Programs," Administrative Science Quarterly (46:2), pp. 202-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667086
  94. Wiersema, M. F. and Bantel, K. A. 1992. "Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change," Academy of Management Journal (35:1), pp. 91-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/256474
  95. Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., and Miller, D. 2017. "Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal (38:1), pp. 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2589
  96. Zucker, L. G. 1987. "Institutional theories of organization," Annual Review of Sociology (13:1), pp. 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
  97. KBS 2009. "교육청, '일부 학생 배제' 조직적 지시," 2009. 02. 24. http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=1728453
  98. MBC 2009. "흐지부지 끝난 '임실 성적조작' 파문," MBC. 2009. 04. 08. http://imnews.imbc.com//news/2009/society/article/2318376_19188.html
  99. MBC 2011. "대전전교 조 "중학교 절반 이상 0교시 수업"," MBC. 2011. 06. 16. http://imnews.imbc.com//news/2011/societ y/article/2870459_18726.html