해양환경안전학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety)

  • 제26권7호
  • /
  • Pages.931-941
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-3431(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3341(eISSN)
해양환경안전학회 (The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

무인 해상 드론용 트윈 세일의 형태와 간격에 관한 연구

Shape and Spacing Effects on Curvy Twin Sail for Autonomous Sailing Drone

  • 팜민억 (목포해양대학교 대학원) ;
  • 김부기 (목포해양대학교 해양메카트로닉스학부) ;
  • 양창조 (목포해양대학교 기관시스템공학부)
  • Pham, Minh-Ngoc (Graduate School of Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Kim, Bu-Gi (Division of Marine Mechatronics, Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Yang, Changjo (Division of Marine Engineering System, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.24
  • 심사 : 2020.12.28
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

해양데이터를 수집하기 위해 필요한 엔지니어, 연구원 및 과학자를 대신할 수 있는 해양 모니터링 장치인 자율주행보트의 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 이 논문은 자율주행보트의 세일을 개발하기 위한 연구로 곡선형 트윈 세일의 공기역학적인 특성을 수치해석적으로 분석하고 이를 날개 형태의 세일과 성능비교를 통해 곡선형 트윈 세일의 공기 역학적인 성능을 확인하였고, 세일의 간격과 형상에 따른 성능을 비교하였다. 유체 해석을 위한 지배방정식은 Navier - Stokes를 사용하였다. 성능비교 결과 곡선 형 트윈 세일은 날개 형태의 세일과 비교하여 양력, 항력 및 추력 계수가 향상됨을 알 수 있다. 또한, 트윈 세일의 양 날개의 간격은 중요한 변수임을 확인 하였다. 0.035 L, 0.07 L, 0.14 L에서는 스톨로 인해 양력 계수의 감소로 나타났고 0.21 L, 0.28 L, 0.35 L에서는 개선되어 0.28 L에서 최대 양력을 보여준다.

There is a growing interest this paper for ocean sensing where autonomous vehicles can play an essential role in assisting engineers, researchers, and scientists with environmental monitoring and collecting oceanographic data. This study was conducted to develop a rigid sail for the autonomous sailing drone. Our study aims to numerically analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of curvy twin sail and compare it with wing sail. Because racing regulations limit the sail shape, only the two-dimensional geometry (2D) was open for an optimization. Therefore, the first objective was to identify the aerodynamic performance of such curvy twin sails. The secondary objective was to estimate the effect of the sail's spacing and shapes. A viscous Navier-Stokes flow solver was used for the numerical aerodynamic analysis. The 2D aerodynamic investigation is a preliminary evaluation. The results indicated that the curvy twin sail designs have improved lift, drag, and driving force coefficient compared to the wing sails. The spacing between the port and starboard sails of curvy twin sail was an important parameter. The spacing is 0.035 L, 0.07 L, and 0.14 L shows the lift coefficient reduction because of dramatically stall effect, while flow separation is improved with spacing is 0.21 L, 0.28 L, and 0.35 L. Significantly, the spacing 0.28 L shows the maximum high pressure at the lower area and the small low pressure area at leading edges. Therefore, the highest lift was generated.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alves, J. C., B. M. Thomas, M. Neal and C. Sauze(2008), Technologies for Autonomous Sailing, Aberystwyth University, UK.
  2. Borglund, D. and J. Kuttenkeuler(2002), Active Wing Flutter Suppression Using a Trailing Edge Flap. J. Fluids Struct., Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.2001.0426
  3. Braun, J. B.(2008), High Fidelity CFD Simulations in Racing Yacht Aerodynamic Analysis, in the proceedings of the 3rd High Performance Yacht Design Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, December 2nd-4th, pp. 168-175.
  4. Carr, L. W. and K. W. McAlister(1983), The effect of a leading-edge slat on the dynamic stall of an oscillating airfoil, AIAA, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-2533.
  5. Claughton, A. R. and I. M. C. Campbell(1994), Wind Tunnel Testing of Sailing Rigs, in the proceedings of the International HISWA Symposium on Yacht Design and Yacht Construction, Amsterdam, November 14th-15th, pp. 89-106.
  6. Daniel, W. A.(1996), The CFD Assisted Design and Experimental Testing of a Wingsail with High Lift Devices, University of Salford, UK.
  7. Eggert, C. A. and C. L. Rumsey(2017), CFD Study of NACA 0018 Airfoil with Flow Control, NACA/TM-2017-219602.
  8. Elkaim, G. H.(2001), System identification for precision control of wing-sailed GPS-guided catamaran, Stanford University.
  9. Elkaim, G. H.(2007), Experimental aerodynamic performance of self-trimming wing-sail for autonomous surface vehicles.
  10. Fallow, J. B.(1996), America's Cup Sail Design, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 63, No. 1-3, pp. 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(96)00075-X
  11. Fish, F. E. and J. M. Battle(1995), Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper, J. Morphol., Vol. 225, No. 1, pp. 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052250105
  12. Gentry, A. E.(1988), The Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Sails, in proceedings of the Symposium on Hydrodynamic Performance Enhancement for Marine Applications, Newport, Rhode Island, USA.
  13. Graf, K., C. Bohem, and H. Ranzsch(2009), CFD- and VPP-Challenges in the Design of the New AC90 America's Cup Yacht, in the proceedings of the 19th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium, Annapolis, USA, March 20th-21st, pp. 1-17.
  14. Hassan, G. E., A. Hassan, and M. E. Youssef(2014), Numerical Investigation of Medium Range Reynold Number Aerodynamics Characteristics for NACA0018 Airfoil, CFD letter, Vol. 6(4), 175-187.
  15. Hedges, K. L.(1993), Computer Modelling of Downwind Sails, ME Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  16. Hedges, K. L., P. J. Richards, and G. D. Mallison(1996), Computer Modeling of Downwind Sails, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 63, No. 1-3, pp. 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(96)00071-2
  17. Hutchins, N.(2008), The Use of Ansys CFX in America's Cup Yacht Design, in the proceedings of the 3rd High Performance Yacht Design Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, December 2nd-4th, pp. 185-192.
  18. Jenkins, R., C. Meinig, N. Lawrence-Slavas, and H. M. Tabisola(2015), The Use of Sail-drones to Examine Spring Conditions in the Bering Sea: Vehicle Specification and Mission Performance, OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington. Retrieved 01 17, 2017.
  19. Kuttenkeuler, J. and R. Mikael(2017), Design of free-rotating wing sail for autonomous sailboat, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
  20. Li, Q., Y. Nihei, T. Nakashima, and Y. Iked(2015), A study on the performance of cascade hard sails and sail-equipped vessels, Ocean Eng., Vol. 98, pp. 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.02.005
  21. Milgram, J. H.(1968), The Aerodynamics of Sails, In the proceedings of the 7th Symposium of Naval Hydrodynamic, pp. 1397-1434.
  22. Neal, M. and C. Saauze(2008), Design considerations for sailing robots performing long-term autonomous oceanography, Austrian Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, pp. 4-10.
  23. Seifert, A., T. Bachar, D. Koss, M. Shepshelovich, and I. Wygnanski(1993), Oscillatory Blowing: A Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation, AIAA J., Vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 2052-2060. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49121