DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Argument-Based Inquiry Activities On Elementary School Students' Claims and Evidence in Science Writing

논의기반 탐구활동이 초등학생의 과학 글쓰기에 나타나는 주장과 증거에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Jiaeng (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung, Dojun (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Geonu (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jun, Jaekyoung (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
  • 박지앵 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 정도준 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 김건우 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 전재경 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 남정희 (부산대학교 화학교육과)
  • Received : 2020.06.10
  • Accepted : 2020.08.17
  • Published : 2020.12.20

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Argument-based Inquiry activities on the claims and evidence in elementary students' science writing. Participants were thirty three fifth grade elementary school students and argument-based inquiry activities on five topics were implemented. We analyzed the Summary Writing samples written by students to investigate the effect of the Argument-based inquiry activities on elementary students' claims and evidence in their science writing, and also analyzed the writing samples of the experimental group to which the Argument-based inquiry activities were implemented, to examine the change of claims and evidence. The results of this study showed that the mean of experimental group was significantly higher than that of the comparison group. As a result of analyzing claims and evidence in Summary Writing of experimental group, the level of claim and evidence has tended to increase gradually as the number of classes progresses.

이 연구는 논의기반 탐구 과학수업이 초등학생의 과학 글쓰기에서 나타나는 주장과 증거에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 광역시 소재의 초등학교 5학년 2개 학급의 학생(33명)을 대상으로 5개 주제의 논의기반 탐구 과학수업을 적용하였다. 논의기반 탐구 과학수업이 과학 글쓰기의 주장과 증거에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 학생들이 작성한 과학 글쓰기를 분석하였으며, 논의수업을 적용한 실험집단의 5개의 주제에 대한 활동지의 과학 글쓰기를 분석하여 주장과 증거의 변화를 알아보았다. 과학 글쓰기 분석 결과, 과학 글쓰기에서 실험집단의 평균이 비교집단보다 유의미하게 높았다. 실험집단의 과학 글쓰기에서 나타나는 주장과 증거 분석 결과, 수업의 횟수가 거듭됨에 따라 주장과 증거의 수준이 점차 증가하는 경향이 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. OECD. OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work, OECD Publishing, Paris. 2019.
  2. Schleicher, A.; Achiron, M.; Burns, T.; Davis, C.; Tessier, R.; Chambers, N. Envisioning the Future of Education and Jobs: Trends, data and drawings. OECD Publishing 2019.
  3. Taguma, M,; Barrera, M. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Curriculum analysis, 2019.
  4. Walker, J.; Van Duzor A.; Lower M. A. Journal of Chemical Educaion 2019, 435.
  5. Osborne, J. Cambridge Journal of Education 2010, 32, 203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559
  6. Ministry of Education. 2015 Education Curriculum. (Notification No. 2015-of the Ministry of Education); Ministry of Education: Seoul, 2015.
  7. Eemeren, F.; Grootendorst, R.; Johnson, R.; Plantin, C.; Willard, C. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. New York: Routledge Books, 2013.
  8. Booth, W.; Colomb, G.; Williams, J.; Alvarez, J. Como Convertirse en un Habil Investigador: Gedisa, 2008.
  9. Haack, S. Defending Science-within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism; Prometheus Books: 2003.
  10. Noviyanti, N. I.; Mukti, W. R.; Yuliskurniawati, I. D.; Mahanal, S.; Zubaidah, S. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2019, 1241, 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012055
  11. Tuzun, U.; Koseoglu, F. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section C Chemical Education 2018, 3, 77.
  12. Lazarou, D.; Erduran, S.; Sutherland. R. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2017, 14, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.05.003
  13. Demirbag, M.; Gunel, M. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 2014, 14, 386.
  14. Sampson, V.; Enderle, P.; Grooms, J.; & Witte, S. Science Education 2013, 97, 643. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069
  15. Tavares, M.; Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.; & Mortimer, E. Science & Education 2010, 19, 573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9206-6
  16. Park. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2019, 39, 337. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.337
  17. Duschl, R.; Osborne, J. Studies in Science Education 2002, 38, 39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
  18. Kang, S.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2000, 20, 250.
  19. Alvermann, D. The Reading Teacher 1991, 45, 92.
  20. Hand, B.; Meier, L.; Staker, J.; Bintz, J. When science and literacy meet in the secondary learning space: Implementing the science writing heuristic (SWH). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa. 2006.
  21. Yore, L.; Bisanz, G.; Hand, B. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25, 689. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
  22. Kelly, G.; Takao, A. Science Education 2002, 86, 314. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
  23. Akkus, R.; Gunel. M.; Hand, B. International Journal of Science Education 2007, 29, 1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601075629
  24. Hohenshell, L.; Hand, B. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28, 261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336965
  25. Burke, K.; Greenbowe, T.; Hand, B. Journal of Chemical Education 2006, 83, 1032. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1032
  26. Kwak, K. Characteristics of the Argumentation in Different Approaches and Contexts, Master Thesis, Pusan National University of Education, Busan, Korea, 2010.
  27. Cho, H. Development and effect of argument-based modeling strategy as teaching method in middle school students, Master Thesis, Pusan National University of Education, Busan, Korea, 2014.
  28. Kang, M.; Kong, Y. Journal of Science Education 2014, 38, 286. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2014.38.2.286
  29. Lee, M.; Kim, H.; Yang, I. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 2019, 38, 216. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.2.216
  30. Nam, K.; Lee, B.; Lee, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2004, 24, 1272.
  31. Choi, H.; Kim, H. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 2019, 39, 59. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.1.59
  32. Lim, O.; Kim, H. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 2018, 38, 839. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.6.839
  33. Kim, H.; Byeon, J.; Kwon, Y. Journal of Science Education 2012, 36, 198. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2012.36.2.198
  34. Bae. H.; Jhun. Y.; Hong. J. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 2009, 28, 178.
  35. Toulmin, S. The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1958.
  36. Jang. K. Effect of Argumentation-based Negotiation in the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach on Students' Question and Claim-Evidence. Master Thesis, Pusan National University of Education, Busan, Korea, 2013.
  37. Jang, K.; Nam, J.; Choi, A. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2012, 32, 1099. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1099
  38. Berland, L.; Lee, V. International Journal of Science Education 2012, 34, 1857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.645086
  39. Hand, B.; Hohenshell, L.; Prain, V. Instructional Science 2007, 35, 343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9012-3
  40. Keys, C.; Hand, B.; Prian, V.; Collins, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  41. Nam. J.; Kwak. K.; Jang. K.; Brian Hand. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2008, 28, 922.
  42. Busan Metropolitan City office of Education. Busan Basic Education Support System. https://candi.pen.go.kr/dn/user/listUser.do?page=1&sortcol=&sortkind=&ty=&tp_type=1&testType=&userIdx=&showFlag=&real_OR_test=R&tpIdx=930&txt_01=, 2019.
  43. Hoking, S. The Universe in a Nutshell. New York: Bantam Books, 2001.
  44. Mercer, N.; Daws, L.; Wegerif, R.; Sams, C. British Education Research Journal 2004, 30, 359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920410001689689
  45. Venvill, G.; Dawson, V. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2010, 47, 952. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358
  46. Zohar, A.; Nemet, F. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2002, 39, 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
  47. Andriessen, J. Handbook for the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2006.