정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제37권4호
  • /
  • Pages.225-253
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

해외 계량서지 서비스 유형 및 사례 분석 연구

Bibliometric Services Types and Cases in Foreign Countries

  • 이재윤 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이지원 (대구가톨릭대학교 도서관학과) ;
  • 김수정 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.24
  • 심사 : 2020.12.19
  • 발행 : 2020.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 해외 도서관의 계량서지 서비스를 유형별로 분석하고 국내 도서관의 계량서지 서비스 도입을 위한 시사점을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 문헌조사와 도서관 웹사이트 분석을 통해 계량서지 서비스를 크게 교육 및 자문 서비스와 연구성과 및 동향 분석 서비스로 나누고 9개의 세분화된 서비스 유형을 파악하였다. 또한 파악한 서비스 유형을 바탕으로 다양한 계량서지 서비스 행태를 분석하였다. 조사 및 분석 결과를 바탕으로 국내 도서관의 계량서지 서비스 개발을 위해 우선적으로 연구성과 관련 기관 리포지터리를 구축하고, 서비스 초기 단계에서는 주제가이드와 교육프로그램을 제공하고, 이후에는 자문 서비스와 분석 서비스와 같이 보다 전문화된 서비스를 제공할 것, 연구자 집단에게 잠재된 서비스 수요를 발굴할 것 등을 제안하였다.

This study aims to investigate bibliometric services practices of foreign libraries by service types and suggest practical considerations for Korean libraries wishing to implement bibliometric services. Through the examination of previous research and library websites, nine types of bibliometric services were identified under two broad categories - education & consulting services and research evaluation & research trend services. According to the service types, a wide range of bibliometric services activities were analyzed and described. Recommendations from the study for service development include: building an institutional repository for scholarly output; developing subject guides and education programs at the initial phase of service and providing more advanced services such as consulting and analysis services at the later phase; identifying the potential service needs of researcher groups.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, Soon (2019). University library's new research support service focusing on scholarly communication in open science era. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.1.007
  2. Kim, Soon, Lee, Boram, Kim, Hwanmin, & Kim, Hyesun (2017). Science and technology research support service trends for open science era. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.229
  3. Lee, Jae Yun (2013). Bibliometris theory and practice II: Bibliometric practices for information management. Presentations at the 2013 Korean Medical Library Association Workshop.
  4. Oh, Sunhye, & Kwak, Seing-Jin (2020). A study on the research support services of the university library based on the research life cycle. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.155
  5. So, Minho (2002). Analysis on the research achievements in science & technology fields using SCI Database. Gwacheon, Korea: Ministry of Science and Technology.
  6. Abernethy, T., & Holderied, A. (2018) Implementing new bibliometric services at EPA-RTP Library. Serials Review, 44(3), 204-210. http://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2018.1549695
  7. Anderson, R. (2011). The crisis in research librarianship. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 289-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2011.04.001
  8. Anglada, L., & Borrego, A. (2018, April). Developing digital scholarship in spanish libraries. Presentations at the Preconference 'Digital Humanities and Digital Scholarship', Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.casalini.it/retreat/web_content/2018/presentations/anglada_borrego.pdf
  9. Astrom, F. (2018). Libraries and bibliometrics: Institutional and professional perspectives. Keynote Speech at the Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy 2018. Retrieved from https://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/54097616/Astrom_NWB2018.pdf
  10. Astrom, F., & Hansson, J. (2013). How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(4), 316-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000612456867
  11. Astrom, F., Hansson, J., & Olsson, M. (2011). Bibliometrics and the changing role of the university libraries. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:461857/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  12. Atash Deligani, F.,, Asadi, S., & Nourmohammadi, H. A. (2017). Identification and classification of the aims, audiences and challenges of scientometrics departments in Iranian medical universities. Journal of Scientometrics, 3(6), 1-14. Retrieved from http://rsci.shahed.ac.ir/article_503_en.html.
  13. Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis: A new business area for information professionals in libraries? Scientometrics, 66(3), 561-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0041-0
  14. Bladek, M. (2014). Bibilometrics services and the academic library: Meeting the emerging needs of the campus community. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3-4), 330-344, https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2014.929066
  15. Bo, J., Cecilia, S., & Karin, H. (2012). Bibliometrisk analyser: Goteborgs universitet 2006 2010. Goteborgs universitetsbibliotek. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/62575/1/gupea_2077_62575_1.pdf
  16. Bryant, R. Clements, A., de Castro, P., Cantrell, J., Dortmund, A., Fransen, J., Gallagher, P., & Mennielli, M. (2018). Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey. Dublin, Ohi: OCLC Research. https://doi.org/10.25333/BGFG-D241
  17. Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917), The history of comparative anatomy. Part I: a statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress, 11(5), 578-596.
  18. Corrall, S., Kennan, M. A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends, 61(3), 636-674. http://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2013.0005
  19. Drummond, R., & Wartho, R. (2009). RIMS: the research impact measurement service at the university of new south wales. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2), 76-87, http://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2009.10721387
  20. Ducas, A., Michaud-Oystryk, N., & Speare, M. (2020). Reinventing ourselves: New and emerging roles of academic librarians in Canadian research-intensive universities. College & Research Libraries, 81(1), 43-65. http://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.1.43
  21. Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Mayer, W. (2010.5.27). Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna. Presentations at the INFORUM, Prague.
  22. Gorraiz, J., Wieland, M., Ulrych, U., & Gumpenberger, C. (2020). De profundis: A decade of bibliometric services under scrutiny. In C. Daraio & W. Glanzel (Eds.), Evaluative Informetrics: The Art of Metrics-Based Research Assessment (pp. 233-260). Springer International Publishing.
  23. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927), College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66(1713), 385-389. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.66.1713.385
  24. Gumpenberger, C., Wieland, M., & Gorraiz, J. (2012). Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna. Library Management, 33(3), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217199
  25. Gutzman, K. E., Bales, M. E., Belter, C. W., Chambers, T., Chan, L., Holmes, K. L., ..., & Wheeler, T. R. (2018). Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.205
  26. Hendrix, D. (2010). Tenure metrics: Bibliometric education and services for academic faculty. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 29(2), 183-189. http://doi.org/10.1080/02763861003723416
  27. Holderied, A., & Johnson, T. A. (2019). A breath of fresh air: New bibliometric services at EPA-RTP Library. In E. M. Lasda (Ed.), The New Metrics: Practical Assessment of Research Impact (pp. 59-92). Emerald Publishing Limited. http://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-269-620191004
  28. Howie, J., & Kara, H. (2020). Research support in New Zealand university libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship (accepted for publicaton). https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2019.1700535
  29. Indian Library Association (1990). ILA Bulletin, 26. Delhi, India: ILA.
  30. Joint Committee on Metrics (2018). The Collection and Use of Research Metrics for Assessment and Evaluation. Joint Committee on Metrics, University of Manitoba and University of Manitoba Faculty Association. Retrieved from http://www.umfa.ca/images/pdfs/Joint_Committee_on_Metrics_Report_Jan_2018.pdf
  31. Lang, L., Wilson, T., Wilson, K., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2018). Research support at the crossroads: Capability, capacity, and collaboration. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3-4), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1460727
  32. Leiss, C., & Gregory, K. (2016). Visability and Impact of Research: Bibliometric Services for University Management and Academic Staff. Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. Paper 3. Retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2128&context=iatulAlso retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2016/plenary/3
  33. Lewis, R., Cathy C. S., & Suiter, A. M. (2015). Scholarly Output Assessment Activities: SPEC Kit 346. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.29242/spec.346
  34. Lund University Library (n.d.). Bibliometrics. Retrieved from https://www.ub.lu.se/en/publish/bibliometrics
  35. Maystrovich, T. V. (2019). Theoretical basis for the development of national standard. Library and Information Services of the Scientific Library. Types, Forms and Modes of Provision. Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 68(5), 465-474. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2019-68-5-465-474
  36. Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Navigating the rising metrics tide in the 21st century: which way for academic librarians in support of researchers in sub-Saharan Africa? South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 84(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.7553/84-2-1762
  37. Powell, K. R., & Elder, J. J. (2019). A bibliometric services workshop for subject librarians. Library Management, 40(5), 305-312. http://doi.org10.1108/LM-03-2018-0014
  38. Primary Research Group (2019). Survey of academic library leadership: Level of support for bibliometrics/altmetrics. New York, NY: Primary Research Group Inc.
  39. Richardson, M. (2011). The Research Excellence Framework: Revisiting the RAE. Research Trends, 22, 3-4. Retrieved from https://www.researchtrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Research_Trends_Issue22.pdf
  40. Stojanovski, J., & Macan, B. (2012). Bibliometric services as a research support services in academic and research libraries. Poster presentations at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) 2012 Conference (Zadar, University of Zada). Retrieved from http://fulir.irb.hr/268/
  41. Szwajcer, A., & Vokey, S. (2020). Building trust after the labour action: A way forward for a nascent bibliometric service. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1993/34723
  42. University of Vienna Library (n.d.). Bibliometric Services for Researchers at the University of Vienna. Retrieved from https://bibliothek.univie.ac.at/bibliometrie/en/services.html
  43. Wrigley, J., Carden, V., & von Isenburg, M. (2019). Bibliometric mapping for current and potential collaboration detection. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(4), 597-600. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.764
  44. Ye, L. (2019). Chinese Academic Library Research Evaluation Services. Journal of Library Administration, 59(1), 97-128. http://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2018.1549416