DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Good Teaching and Desirable Teaching Behaviors Perceived by Nursing Students

간호학생이 인식하는 좋은 수업과 바람직한 교수행동

  • 고일선 (연세대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 김진숙 (우송대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 이정민 (육군사관학교 근무지원단 병원)
  • Received : 2019.07.30
  • Accepted : 2019.11.21
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

Purpose: This purpose of this study was to identify both good teaching and desirable teaching behaviors perceived by nursing students. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. A convenience sample of 324 nursing students was selected and they completed self-reported questionnaires from November 1 to December 30, 2015. Results: Among 4 perspectives of good teaching (traditional, systemic, interaction, and constructionism), the traditional perspective was perceived as the highest form of good teaching, while the systemic perspective was perceived as the lowest. Meanwhile, disclosure and clarity were perceived as the highest desirable teaching behaviors. Regardless of students' perspective of good teaching, all 4 perspectives of good teaching were positively related with clarity, enthusiasm, interaction, organization, and disclosure as desirable teaching behaviors independently. Conclusions: Nursing students perceived that the highest perspective of good teaching was the traditional perspective. Meanwhile, they perceived that clarity, enthusiasm, interaction, organization, and disclosure were desirable teaching behaviors regardless of their perspective of good teaching. Further study will be needed to perceive nursing faculty's awareness of good teaching and desirable teaching behaviors to identify the difference of awareness between nursing students and faculty.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. H. (2014). A qualitative study on characteristics of "good" college classes. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(1), 163-191.
  2. Alhosis, K. F., El-Gawly, H. W., Vallar, L. E., & Balajadia, P. C. (2015). Teaching behavior inventory at the college of nursing, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A comparative survey. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 23(1), 38E-49E. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.23.1.E38
  3. Azer, S. A. (2005). The qualities of a good teacher: How can they be acquired and sustained? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98(2), 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.98.2.67
  4. Bang, S. Y., & Eun, Y. (2017). The effect of debriefing using reflective questions and writing in simulation training: Post operative care of abdominal surgery. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 23(4), 463-473. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.4.463
  5. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Chesebro, J. L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302471
  7. Cho, B. (2010). A famous lecture: Know how & know why. Seoul: Hainaim.
  8. Choi J, Y., Kim, E. Y., Cho, B., Lee, J. K., & Kim, S. K. (2012). Good teaching model development & case study research (for SBS Higher education quality) (Research Report No. CR2012-05). Jincheon-Gun: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  9. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  10. Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education the ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 666-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729948
  11. Im, E. J., Lee, Y. C., Chang, B. H., & Chung, S. K. (2010). Investigation of the requirements of ‘Good Teaching' to improve teaching professionalism in medical education. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2010.22.2.101.
  12. Jeong, E. I. (2010). Perceptions by teachers and students of good teaching at college. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 22(3), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2010.22.3.25
  13. Jeong, J. Y. (2012). An analysis of the relationship between teaching behavior preference and academic adjustment with the perspectives about good instructional practice of university students (Unpublished master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul
  14. Johnson-Farmer, B., & Frenn, M. (2009). Teaching excellence: What great teachers teach us. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25(5), 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.020
  15. Kang, I. A., & Choo, H. J. (2009). Re-conceptualization of the learner-centered education: The status quo of the in-service teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 9(2), 1-34.
  16. Lee, E. H., & Kim, H. Y. (2008). Defining a "good instruction": The qualitative study of undergraduate students in Korea. The Journal of Korean Educational Idea, 22(1), 123-146. https://doi.org/10.17283/jkedi.2008.22.1.123
  17. Lee, H. B., & Yang, E. B. (2013). A study on the characteristics of excellent lecturers in medical school. Korean Journal Medical Education, 25(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2013.25.1.47
  18. Lee, Y. S., & Eun, Y. (2016). The effect of the flipped learning on self-efficacy, critical thinking disposition, and communication competence of nursing students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 22(4), 567-576. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.4.567
  19. Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.138
  20. Murray, H. G. (2015). Teacher behaviors inventory. Retrieved from http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/murray/
  21. Park, S. M., & Sim, M. J. (2011). Analysis of teaching behavior based on the learner-centered teaching competency. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 23(3), 374-387.
  22. Patrick, B. C., Hisley, J., & Kempler, T. (2000). What's everybody so excited about?: The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600093
  23. Roh, Y. S., Ryoo, E. N., Choi, E. W., Baek, S. S., & Kim, S. S. (2012). A survey of student perceptions, academic achievement, and satisfaction of team-based learning in a nursing course. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 18(2), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.2.239
  24. Seo, K. H. (2004). The perspectives and conceptions about good instructional practice: An interview study of teachers and students. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(4), 165-187.
  25. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3-4), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9053-z
  26. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  27. Wolf, Z. R., Bender, P. J., Beitz, J. M., Wieland, D. M., & Vito, K. O. (2004). Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: A descriptive study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20(2), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003
  28. World Health Organization. (2015). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
  29. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: Today's standards for teaching and learning in America's schools (3rd ed.). Porsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.