DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Historical Review on High-rise Buildings-promoting Policies on the Main Roads of Seoul for Urban Beautification from the 1950s to the 1970s

1950-1970년대 도시미화를 위한 서울 간선도로변 고층화제도의 사적 고찰

  • 박일향 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과) ;
  • 전봉희 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과)
  • Received : 2019.06.26
  • Accepted : 2019.09.30
  • Published : 2019.10.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the historical development of high-rise buildings-promoting policies in Seoul in terms of modern urban redevelopment. The results of this study were as follows; The maximum height of the buildings has been limited by National codes since 1934. But at the same time, Seoul Metropolitan government had limited the minimum building floors of roadside buildings through local regulations after the Korean War. The high-rise city had been regarded as a means of beautifying Seoul for a long time. However since the 2000s, the minimum height limit for buildings was removed from local regulations and the concept of high-rise restrictions was no longer significant as before.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 서울대학교

References

  1. An, J. (1969). Landscape Planning of Korean Cities, Urban affairs, 4(7), 20-22.
  2. Fujimori, T. (1990). Meiji Plans for Tokyo, Iwanami Shoten, 1-34.
  3. Han, J. (1969). High-rise Buildings and FAR Zone Regulation, Urban affairs, 4(11), 12-19.
  4. Han, J. (1973). Problems of revised Building Act, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 17(1), 73.
  5. Han, J. (1982). A Study on the Transition of Korean Building Law and the Issues, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 26(4), 83-87.
  6. Jeong, I. (1973). The significance and practicality of Aesthetic District, Korean architects, 1973(6), 30-33.
  7. Korea Institute of Registered Architects. (1968). A tendency to become high-rise in 1968, Korean architects, 3(10), 6.
  8. Korea Institute of Registered Architects. (1972). Current Issues, Korean architects, 1972(47), 70.
  9. Lee, K. (1959). For the prosperity of architecture, Review of Architecture and Building Science, (4), 3.
  10. Lee, M. (1962). Architectural Administration, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 6(7), 10.
  11. Lee, M. (1966). 20 Years of Building Act, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 10(21), 23-24.
  12. Lee, Y. (2014). Modernization Process of the Street Environment, Korean Journal of Urban History, (11), 13.
  13. Osawa, A. (2008a). History of building height (vol. 1), The Journal of the Land Institute, 16(2), 19.
  14. Osawa, A. (2008b). A historical review of highest-limited height control in Urban Building Act l919, The Journal of the Land Institute, 16(1), 52-57.
  15. Osawa, A. (2011). A study on enactment process of floor area ratio in Japan, The Journal of the Land Institute, 19(1), 91, 104.
  16. Osawa, A. (2012). Historical Transition of Height Restriction by Height-Control-Zone in the City-Planning Act and the Building Standards Act, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 47(3), 211-216.
  17. Park, I., & Jeon. B. (2018). The Development of Market Modernization Plan in Seoul in the late 1960s, Korea Association for Architectural History Spring Conference, 2018(May), 219-220.
  18. Park, I., & Jeon. B. (2018). The attempts to build higher buildings in the process of Capital Reconstruction in Seoul in the 1950s, Korea Association for Architectural History Autumn Conference, 2018(Nov), 25-28.
  19. Seo, J. (2007). A study on the effect of maximum height regulation district, Thesis, Seoul National University, 9-11.
  20. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (1966). The Master Plan of Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 66, 157, 198-215, 340.
  21. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (1983). Urban Design for Main streets in Seoul, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 2-65, 245.
  22. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (1984). Urban Design for Teheran-ro, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 41-123.
  23. Shon, J. (2003). Seoul Urban Planning Stories, Hanul, 130-138. 221-223.
  24. The Architectural Institute of Korea. (1966a). Special Feature-Current Status and Prospects of Korean Architecture:Day4. Building Policy, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 10(22), 23-29.
  25. The Architectural Institute of Korea. (1966b). Suggestions for urban planning, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 10(23), 25-26.
  26. The Seoul Institute. (1998). A Study on the Improvement of Aesthetic District, The Seoul Institute, 11-19, 52-56.
  27. The Seoul Institute. (2000). A study for the Amendment of Overlay Zoning Districts in Seoul, The Seoul Institute, 43.
  28. The Seoul Institute. (2001). Seoul 20th century growth & change of the last 100 years, The Seoul Institute, 589-590.
  29. Urban planning bureau. (1964). Urban Planning Achievement, Urban planning bureau, 11-12.
  30. Yoon, H. (2011). The Legal History of Town Planning Act(1934-1962) in Korea, Thesis, Chonnam National University, 40-41, 45, 67, 81-82.
  31. Yoon, H. (2017). A Study of Trends in the Research on the History of Urban Planning in Korea, Korean Journal of Urban History, (18), 234-237, 242-243.
  32. Yun, J. (1962). Urban Planning: Seoul City Planning in 1962 and Future Master Plan, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 6(7), 8.
  33. Zew, W. (1955). Urban planning and Regional planning, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 56, 59.