DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

College student adoption of smart learning management system - Implementing Blackboard learn -

대학생의 스마트 학습관리시스템 수용에 대한 연구 - 블랙보드 도입과 활용 -

  • Lee, Kyu-Hye (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Yeon (Strategsic Planning Team, Korea Research Institute for Fashion and Distribution Information) ;
  • Seo, Hyun-Jin (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2019.08.30
  • Accepted : 2019.10.25
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

Contemporary University students are considered the Z generation who were born after 1995. They are more tech savvy than millennials. To target the generation, traditional class management platforms have evolved to smart LMS that is more customized and accessible for smart devices. Global level information search and collaboration can also be implemented using such smart LMS. However, switching from one LMS to another LMS requires great effort from teachers and support from staffs. This study measured the learners' perception of the system when they were exposed to a new smart-LMS. Blackboard Learn Ultra was used for 15 weeks and at the end of the semester, a questionnaire was administered to the students of these classes. Results indicated that experience with previous LMS discouraged students from adopting Blackboard Learn. Result of TAM modeling indicated that perceived usefulness, compared to perceived ease of use and attitude, was an effective aspect to bring positive acceptance of the system. A qualitative approach and network analysis were also conducted based on students' responses. Both positive and negative responses were detected. Inconvenience due to mechanical aspects was mentioned. Dissatisfaction compared to previous local LMS use was also mentioned. Mobile application and communication effectiveness were positive aspects. Revised course development and promoting how useful the system may help enhance the acceptance of the new system.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2010). Instructors' acceptance of learning management systems: A theoretical framework. Communications of the IBIMA, 2010(2010), 1-10.
  2. Beatty, B., & Ulasewicz, C. (2006). Faculty perspectives on moving from blackboard to the moodle learning management system. TechTrends, 50(4), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0036-y
  3. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
  4. Cigdem, H., & Topcu, A. (2015). Predictors of instructors' behavioral intention to use learning management system: A Turkish vocational college example. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 22-28. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049
  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and the user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-339. doi:10.2307/249008
  6. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  7. Findik-Coskuncay, D., Alkis, N., & Ozkan-Yildirim, S. (2018). A structural model for students' adoption of learning management systems: An empirical investigation in the higher education context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 13-27.
  8. Gamble, C. (2018). Exploring EFL university students' acceptance of e-learning using TAM. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 22, 23-37.
  9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  10. Hanif, A., Jamal, F. Q., & Imran, M. (2018). Extending the technology acceptance model for use of e-learning systems by digital learners. IEEE Access, 6, 73395-73404. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881384
  11. Hanyang University Blackboard Support Center (2018). Blackboard user manual: For instructors. Seoul: Hanyang University.
  12. Jordan, M. M., & Duckett, N. D. (2018). Universities confront 'tech disruption': Perceptions of student engagement online using two learning management systems. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 10(1), 1-23.
  13. Kim, J. S., Yang, H. D., Um, H. M., & Kim, J. K. (2005). Consensus of corporate e-learning system stakeholders regarding the satisfaction of end-users. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 27-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00184.x
  14. Kim, J-H., & Do, J-W. (2015). Analysis of blackboard system in Korea and the united states universities. Journal of Education & Culture, 21(3), 27-56. doi:10.24159/joec.2015.21.3.27
  15. Kim, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2016). Analysis of properties of fashion trading areas using network analysis technique. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 40(2), 203-220. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.20116.40.2.203
  16. Lee, H. S., & Im, J. H. (2008). SPSS 14.0 manual: Statistical package for the social sciences. Paju: Bobmunsa.
  17. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40, 191-204. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  18. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-411. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
  19. Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  20. Scott, R. (2016, November 28). Get ready for generation Z. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/causeintegration/2016/11/28/get-ready-for-generationz/#7334ba2e2204
  21. Sezer, B., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Learning management system acceptance scale (LMSAS): A validity and reliability study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 15-30. doi:10.14742/ajet.3959
  22. Stoel, L., & Lee, K. H. (2003). Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware. Internet Research, 13(5), 364-374. doi: 10.1108/10662240310501649
  23. Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
  24. Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Doll, W., Deng, X., & Williams, M. (2018). The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 311-319. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436590