DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumer responses towards combinations of diverse methods notifying price discounts of clothing products

의류제품의 다양한 가격할인 제시방법 결합에 따른 소비자 반응

  • Received : 2019.09.27
  • Accepted : 2019.10.24
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of combinations of diverse methods notifying price discounts (i.e., reference price, odd price, and discount rate signs) and the relationships among product attribute perception, discount perception, attitude toward product, and purchase intention of product. Experiments were conducted where 12 stimuli of different price discount information notifications regarding T-shirt advertisements were presented to 352 informants. The results showed that notification of each type of discount information increased discount perception, whereas no effect due to the size of letters used in the discount rate notification was found. As more price discount information notifications were used, discount perception tended to become stronger. The results of ANOVA analysis show that both product attribute perception and discount perception affected attitude toward the product. In addition, product purchase intention was determined by attitude toward the product as well as price discount perception. Based on these findings, marketers may want to use a combination of methods of price discount notifications in advertisements to deliver price discount information clearly to consumers. Confirmation of discount information using multiple cues would help consumers to notice and perceive price discount information provided by retailers more effectively. Discount information is crucial for increasing both purchase intention and favorable attitude, therefore, diverse strategies regarding discount information presentations should be developed, tested and applied in the real world of retailing.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Chen, H. A., & Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 327-340. doi:10.1086/518531
  3. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64-76. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_9
  4. Darke, P. P., & Freedman, J. L. (1993). Deciding whether to seek a bargain: Effects of both amount and percentage off. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 960-965. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.960
  5. Della Bitta, D., Albert, J., Monroe, K. B., & McGinnis, J. M. (1981). Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisement. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), 416-427. doi:10.1177/002224378101800402
  6. Fiore, A. M., Yan, X., & Yoh, E. (2000). Effect of environmental fragrancing on aesthetic experiences and consumer approach responses. Psychology and Marketing, 17(1), 27-54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200001)17:1<27::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-C
  7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
  8. Fuchs, J., Heyer, T., Langenhan, D., & Hippius, M. (2008). Influence of font sizes on the readability and comprehensibility of package inserts. Pharmazeutische Industrie, 70(5), 584-592.
  9. Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Hampshire, UK: Cengage.
  10. Hyun, J. E., & Hong, H. S. (2002). Retail sale advertising: Effects of reference price, price rationale and price-quality inference on evaluation of apparel attributes. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 9(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/12297119.2002.9707309
  11. Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotional signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 74-81. doi:10.1086/208538
  12. Jang, J.-M., & Lee, J.-H. (2014). The effect of additional discount information mode (Linguistic vs. Nonlinguistic) on perceived discount attractiveness. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 29(October), 101-117. doi:10.15830/kmr.2014.29.5.101
  13. Jeon, H. (2011). The effects on information presentation modes and complexity of website. Journal of Korea Design Forum, 32, 161-170. doi:10.21326/ksdt.2011..32.014
  14. Jo, Y., Lee, W., & Lee, S. (2009). Effect of oddprice: Moderating effect of price level and brand recognition. Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 27(3), 97-108.
  15. Jun, Y.-M., & Chung, M.-S. (2002). The moderating effects of semantic cues of discount types on consumer's perception and purchase intention in prices discount advertising of clothing products. Journal of the Korea Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(9), 1342-1353.
  16. Kim, G. H., Choi, K. Y., & Cho, K. J. (2009). The influence of advertising exposure by visual-area on explicit & implicit memory. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 10(1), 55-78. doi:10.21074/kjlcap.2009.10.1.55
  17. Kim, J. H., & Kyung, S. (2015). How the first digits of odd prices affect price discount perception: Focusing on cognitive accessibility and subjective categorization. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 16(1), 21-43.
  18. Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2010). Availability and perceived value by discount expression frames('won'/'percent'). Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 11(4), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2010.11.4.599
  19. Kim, J.-Y. (2003). A study on the background color of products in online shopping sites: Focused on clothes in pop-up windows. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  20. Kim, K, S. (2010). AMOS 18.0 structural equation model analysis. Seoul: Hannarae.
  21. Kim, K., & Ryu, G. (2008). Regulatory focus and tensile price claims. Korean Marketing Review, 23, 197-217.
  22. Kim, Y. S., & Kang, T. W. (2003). The effects of price discount scale and the phrases representing discount rates to consumers' buying intention. Korean Studies Information Service System, 22, 21-34.
  23. Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing. 78(2), 101-118. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(02)00072-6
  24. Kwak, Y. S., & Lee, J. H. (2002). Market segmentation with price-dependent quality evaluation in denim jeans market: Based on conjoint analysis and mixture model. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(11), 1605-1614.
  25. Lee, C.-K., & Kim, E-H. (2011). A study on advertisement using duplicating and its effectiveness depending on the level of significance of the product over the consumer's interest. Journal of Korea Design Forum, 33, 287-298. doi:10.21326/ksdt.2011..33.026
  26. Lee, E. J., & Jeong, I. S. (2014). Readability of package labeling of nonprescription drugs by font sizes. Korean Public Health Research, 40(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.22900/KPHR.2014.40.4.001
  27. Lee, E. J., Yang, S. E., Hwang, E. Y., & Choi, M. W. (2012). Individual differences in working memory capacity determine attentional control and the recall of advertising text language: An eyetracking study. Korea Marketing Review, 27(4), 101-122.
  28. Lee, J. Y. (2019, July 27). 불황기 소비는 양극화로 간다 [Consumption during depression goes to the polarization]. Donga.com. Retrieved October 1, 2019 from http://www.donga.com/news/article/all/20190727/96723185/1
  29. Lee, S. H. (2007). Study on the product display design for internet shopping malls. Unpublished master's thesis, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea.
  30. Mazumdar, T., & June, S. Y. (1993). Consumer evaluations of multiple versus single price change. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 441-450. doi:10.1086/209360
  31. Monroe, K. B. (1979). Pricing: Making profitable decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  32. Myung K. S. (1993). A study on the typography and legibility. Journal of Konkuk University. 37, 239-252.
  33. Opus Yonsei. (2014). 미처 알지 못했던 다양한 pricing 전략 [Diverse pricing strategies that have not been known before]. Excellence Marketing for Customer, 551, 60-66.
  34. Park, J. C., & Lee, E. Y. (2013). Investigating factors influencing odd price effect: Focusing on the effect of magnitude. Journal of Consumer Studies, 24(4), 1-22.
  35. Park, M.-S., & Shin, J.-K. (2010). The effects of reference price advertisement for discount by the levels of perceived risk in service product. Korean Business Education Review, 59, 201-219.
  36. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2010). Consumer behavior and marketing rategy (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  37. Petroshius, S. M., & Monroe, K. B. (1987). Effect of product-line pricing characteristics on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 511-519. doi:10.1086/209084
  38. Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. M. (1993). Testing for perceptual underestimation of 9-ending prices. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 580-585.
  39. Shin, K. W. (2019, May 8). "남보다 비싸면 2배 보상"...유통家, 목숨 건 '최저가 전쟁' ["Double rewards for the higher price than others"...Retailers, life risking 'the lowest price war']. News1. Retrieved October 1, 2019 from http://news1.kr/articles/?3615160
  40. Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
  41. Song, J.-D. (2010). Framing effect of reference price on price discount for building. Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 28(5), 1-12. doi: 10.36345/kacst.2010.28.5.001
  42. Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 54-64. doi:10.1086/429600
  43. Wiedmann, K.-P., Hennigs, N., & Siebels, A. (2009). Value-based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 625-651. doi:10.1002/mar.20292
  44. Wogalter, M. S., & Vigilante Jr., W. J. (2003). Effects of label format on knowledge acquisition and perceived readability by younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 46(4), 327-344. doi:10.1080/0014013021000048006