디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학교수들이 인식하는 PBL 수업운영의 난관 탐색

A Research on University Faculty Member's Perception of the Barriers about PBL Implementing

  • 투고 : 2019.08.01
  • 심사 : 2019.10.20
  • 발행 : 2019.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 대학교수가 PBL 수업을 운영하는 과정에서 인식하는 난관을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 충남에 위치한 B대학에서 2017년 1학기, 2학기, 2018년 1학기동안 PBL 수업을 운영한 교수 32명이 작성한 수업성찰 보고서의 수업운영 난관관련 내용을 귀납적 분석방법(inductive content analysis)을 통해 분석하였다. 연구결과, PBL 수업운영의 난관들은 교수신념(teaching beliefs), 교실문화(classroom culture), 학습촉진(learning facilitation), 평가(assessment), 학교환경(school environment)의 대주제로 구분되었다. 이와 같은 교수들의 PBL 운영 난관을 해소하기 위해 향후 필요한 연구와 지원을 제안하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, PBL 운영 난관별로 해결방안을 모색하는 연구가 수행되어야 한다. 둘째, 학교차원에서 교수의 PBL 수업운영의 난관을 극복할 수 있는 교수역량개발 프로그램이 지원되어야 한다. 셋째, PBL 수업운영에 부합하는 물리적 학교환경과 학사제도의 변화가 수반되어야 한다. 마지막으로 PBL 운영 난관에 대한 연구가 보다 확대되어야 한다.

The purpose of this study is to examine about various barriers recognized by university faculty members while implementing PBL. By adopting the inductive content analysis, this study has analyzed the contents related with the barriers about PBL implementing in the teaching reflection reports submitted by 32 professors of B university. After the analysis, the barriers have been summarized into 5 major topics such as 'teaching beliefs,' 'classroom culture,' 'learning facilitation,' 'assessment,' 'school environment.' Results suggest: First, a study on the specific solutions for the barriers summarized by 5 major topics should be launched. Second, a teaching competency development program to resolve the barriers should be supported. Third, an innovation of physical school environment and school policy appropriate for PBL implementing should be involved. Fourth, a study on the barriers about PBL implementing should be further expanded.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280. DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  2. Y. S. Kim & J. H. Lee. (2014). A comprehensive study on a new direction of human resource policy. Sejong : KDI.
  3. S. Boss. (2013). PBL for 21st century success. Novato: Buck Institute for Education.
  4. Ministry of Education. (2015). A higher education human resources development plan for alignment social demand. Sejong : Ministry of Education.
  5. S. K. Park. (2018). The 4thindustrial revolution and Korean university's role change. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(1), 235-242. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.1.235
  6. M. S. Choi. (2018). Convergence study about improvement of communication ability and problem-solving applying project-based learning on community dental hygiene practice education. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 67-74. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.6.067
  7. M. Fullan & M. Langworthy. (2014). A Rich Seam: how new pedagogies find deep learning. London : Pearson.
  8. J. H. Lee. et al. (2016). A Education Innovation using Project Based Learning. Sejong : KDI.
  9. B. Condliffe et al. (2017). Project-Based Learning A Literature Review. New York : MDRC.
  10. M. H. Shin & D. S. Choi. (2019). Project-based learning and learner interaction by web convergency communication types. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(2), 35-40. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.2.035
  11. Y. Oh. (2017). The meaning exploration of project instruction case. The Journal of Korean Education, 44(1), 5-32.
  12. S. H. Ryu. (2013). An exploration on 1st graders' school adaptation process through a project approach. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 18(2), 415-448.
  13. S. Y. Jang. (2014). The effect of Students' Communication ability, Leadership, Critical thinking ability, and ICT-literacy on the learner's reflective thinking in the Project-based Learning Environment. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 26(3), 391-407. DOI : 10.17927/tkjems.2014.26.3.391
  14. M. R. Kim. (2017). Policy Diagnosis and Plan for the Innovation of Higher Education. Sejong : Ministry of Education.
  15. P. C. Blumenfeld, et al.' (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. DOI : 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
  16. J. R. Mergendoller & J. W. Thomas. (2000). Managing project based learning: principles from the field. Presentation to the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (pp. 1-51). New Orleans : AERA.
  17. J. Y. Kim. (2018). A study on UX design process lecture based on modified PBL(Problem-Based Learning). Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(1), 117-131. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.1.117
  18. P. A. Ertmer & K. D. Simons. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 40-54. DOI : 10.7771/1541-5015.1005
  19. S. R. Tamim & M. M. Grant. (2013). Definitions and uses: case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 72-101. DOI : 10.7771/1541-5015.1323
  20. J. S. Lee. et al. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2). DOI : 10.7771/1541-5015.1426
  21. Y. H. Lee & Y. H. Hang. (2019). Suggestion of RI (IR) -DCA project model and investigation about teachers' awareness about activating the student-centered project. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(2), 175-202. DOI : 10.24159/joec.2019.25.2.175
  22. E. J. Yun. (2015). A study of developing key contents for self directed teacher education program with project: focused on project-implementing. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 36(3), 195-213. DOI : 10.5723/kjcs.2015.36.3.195
  23. D. A. Schon. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  24. B. Erkmen. (2014). Novice EFL teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning, and their classroom practices. H. U. Journal of Education, 29(1), 99-113.
  25. J. W. Thomas. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA : The Autodesk Foundation.
  26. S. A. Gallagher. (1997). Problem-based learning: where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going?, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 332-362. DOI : 10.1177/016235329702000402
  27. C. Ames & J. Archer.(1988). Achievement goal in the classroom: students' learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. DOI : 10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.260
  28. C. E. Hmelo-Silver. (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. DOI : 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  29. K. D. Simons & J. D. Klein. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35(1), 41-72. DOI : 10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
  30. W. Hung. (2011). Theory to reality: a few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Education Technology Research Development, 59(4), 529-552. DOI : 10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1
  31. W. C. Parker et al. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424-1459. DOI : 10.3102/0002831213504237
  32. H. J. Keum. (2016). The basic theoretical research for a practice of university faculty member's teaching reflection. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(2), 57-63. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2016.14.2.57