DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Burst criterion for Indian PHWR fuel cladding under simulated loss-of-coolant accident

  • Received : 2019.01.07
  • Accepted : 2019.04.05
  • Published : 2019.09.25

Abstract

The indigenous nuclear power program of India is based mainly on a series of Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs). A burst correlation for Indian PHWR fuel claddings has been developed and empirical burst parameters are determined. The burst correlation is developed from data available in literature for single-rod transient burst tests performed on Indian PHWR claddings in inert environment. The heating rate and internal overpressure were in the range of 7 K/s-73 K/s and 3 bar-80 bar, respectively, during the burst tests. A burst criterion for inert environment, which assumes that deformation is controlled by steady state creep, has been developed using the empirical burst parameters. The burst criterion has been validated with experimental data reported in literature and the prediction of burst parameters is in a fairly good agreement with the experimental data. The burst criterion model reveals that increasing the heating rate increases the burst temperature. However, at higher heating rates, burst strain is decreased considerably and an early rupture of the claddings without undergoing considerable ballooning is observed. It is also found that the degree of anisotropy has significant influence on the burst temperature and burst strain. With increasing degree of anisotropy, the burst temperature for claddings increases but there is a decrease in the burst strain. The effect of anisotropy in the ${\alpha}$-phase is carried over to ${\alpha}+{\beta}$-phase and its effect on the burst strain in the ${\alpha}+{\beta}$-phase too can be observed.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Suman, M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, Performance enhancement of solar collectorsda review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49 (2015) 192-210, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.04.087.
  2. A.B. Karaveli, U. Soytas, B.G. Akinoglu, Comparison of large scale solar PV (photovoltaic) and nuclear power plant investments in an emerging market, Energy 84 (2015) 656-665, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2015.03.025.
  3. D. Cortes-Borda, G. Guillen-Gosalbez, L. Jimenez, Assessment of nuclear energy embodied in international trade following a world multi-regional inputeoutput approach, Energy 91 (2015) 91-101, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2015.07.117.
  4. A. Adamantiades, I. Kessides, Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 5149-5166, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.07.052.
  5. M.F. Ruth, O.R. Zinaman, M. Antkowiak, R.D. Boardman, R.S. Cherry, M.D. Bazilian, Nuclear-renewable hybrid energy systems: opportunities, interconnections, and needs, Energy Convers. Manag. 78 (2014) 684-694, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2013.11.030.
  6. C. Forsberg, Hybrid systems to address seasonal mismatches between electricity production and demand in nuclear renewable electrical grids, Energy Policy 62 (2013) 333-341, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.07.057.
  7. S. Suman, Hybrid nuclear-renewable energy systems: a review, J. Clean. Prod. 181 (2018) 166-177, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.01.262.
  8. M.M. Abu-Khader, Recent advances in nuclear power: a review, Prog. Nucl. Energy 51 (2009) 225-235, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2008.05.001.
  9. J. Augutis, L. Martisauskas, R. Krikstolaitis, Energy mix optimization from an energy security perspective, Energy Convers. Manag. 90 (2015) 300-314, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2014.11.033.
  10. C. Karakosta, C. Pappas, V. Marinakis, J. Psarras, Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: characteristics and prospects, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 22 (2013) 187-197, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2013.01.035.
  11. S.S. Bajaj, A.R. Gore, The Indian PHWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (2006) 701-722, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.09.028.
  12. S. Suman, M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, R.N. Singh, J.K. Chakravartty, Hydrogen in zircaloy: mechanism and its impacts, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 (2015) 5976-5994, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.03.049.
  13. H.E. Rosinger, A model to predict the failure of zircaloy-4 fuel sheathing during postulated loca conditions, J. Nucl. Mater. 120 (1984) 41-54, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(84)90169-7.
  14. S. Suman, M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, R.N. Singh, J.K. Chakravartty, Rupture behaviour of nuclear fuel cladding during loss-of-coolant accident, Nucl. Eng. Des. 307 (2016) 319-327, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2016.07.022.
  15. S. Suman, M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, R.N. Singh, Investigation of elevatedtemperature mechanical properties of ${\delta}$-hydride precipitate in Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding tubes using nanoindentation, J. Alloy. Comp. 726 (2017) 107-113, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2017.07.321.
  16. S. Suman, M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, R.N. Singh, 3D simulation of hydride-assisted crack propagation in zircaloy-4 using XFEM, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (2017) 18668-18673, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.04.163.
  17. T.K. Sawarn, S. Banerjee, K.M. Pandit, S. Anantharaman, Study of clad ballooning and rupture behavior of fuel pins of Indian PHWR under simulated LOCA condition, Nucl. Eng. Des. 280 (2014) 501-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2014.10.011.
  18. M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, S. Suman, A. Deo, R. Singh, Burst investigation on zircaloy-4 claddings in inert environment, Ann. Nucl. Energy 69 (2014) 292-300, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2014.02.017.
  19. M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, A.K. Deo, R. Singh, Burst criterion for zircaloy-4 fuel cladding in an inert environment, Nucl. Eng. Des. 265 (2013) 886-894, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2013.08.071.
  20. T.K. Sawarn, S. Banerjee, S.S. Sheelvantra, J.L. Singh, V. Bhasin, Study of clad ballooning and rupture behaviour of Indian PHWR fuel pins under transient heating condition in steam environment, J. Nucl. Mater. 495 (2017) 332-342, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2017.08.008.
  21. F. Erbacher, H. Neitzel, H. Rosinger, H. Schmidt, K. Wiehr, Burst criterion of zircaloy fuel claddings in a loss-of-coolant accident, zircon, Nucl. Ind. (1982) 271-283, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP37058S.
  22. S. Suman, M.K. Khan, M. Pathak, R.N. Singh, Effects of hydrogen on thermal creep behaviour of Zircaloy fuel cladding, J. Nucl. Mater. 498 (2018) 20-32, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2017.10.015.
  23. H.E. Sills, R.A. Holt, NIRVANA, a high-temperature creep model for Zircaloy fuel sheathing, At. Energy Canada Ltd. AECL (1979) 6412.

Cited by

  1. Influence of hydrogen concentration on burst parameters of Zircaloy-4 cladding tube under simulated loss-of-coolant accident vol.52, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.02.009
  2. Deep neural network based prediction of burst parameters for Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding during loss-of-coolant accident vol.52, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.04.025
  3. Impact of hydrogen on rupture behaviour of Zircaloy-4 nuclear fuel cladding during loss-of-coolant accident: a novel observation of failure at multiple locations vol.53, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.07.017
  4. Circumferential steady-state creep test and analysis of Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding vol.53, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.01.010