DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Impact of Corporate Communication on Work Performance

기업 내 커뮤니케이션 형태가 업무성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Lee, Ji-Hun (Department of Business Administration, Seowon University) ;
  • Baek, Chaehwan (Department of Business Administration, Seowon University)
  • Received : 2019.09.01
  • Accepted : 2019.09.25
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between complexity, tacit knowledge, know-how, perception, and perception on business performance, and to suggest management implications for corporate performance and organizational executives. Therefore, the implications of this study are as follows. First, corporate representatives and staff in charge of organization should be able to access various information and contents through various routes about the work of members of the organization, and should make efforts to freely communicate among members. Second, corporate representatives and organizational practitioners should consider using the traditional methods of communication within their work, but allowing more informed and inmates to do more off-the-job activities that can increase intimacy with each other. Third, corporate representatives and organizational practitioners should provide a situation in which they can acquire work knowledge in a variety of ways, but must devise communication methods to increase information sharing and information value among members. Fourth, corporate representatives and organizational practitioners should endeavor to provide employees with educational support, family invitation events, awards and bonuses, and compliments that will make them more interested in their work. Lastly, corporate representatives and organizational practitioners are encouraged to maintain effective communication, employee pride, etc., so that the concentration of work, achievement, quality and productivity of work, and high professionalism can be maintained. You will have to work hard.

Keywords

References

  1. Andy, C., and David, C., The Extended Mind, Analysis, 1998, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  2. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y., On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1998, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  3. Barney, J.B., Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  4. Campbell, J.P., Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, In : Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, L.M., eds., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, 1990.
  5. Castaneda, J.A., Munoz-Leiva, F., and Luque, T., Web Acceptance Model : Moderating Effects of User Experience, Information and Management, 2007, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 384-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.003
  6. Challagalla, G.N., and Shervani, T.A., Dimension and Type of Supervisory Control : Effects on Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing, 1996, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 89-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251890
  7. Charles, J., The Architecture of Jumping Universe, Great Britain, 1997.
  8. Choi, G.J., The Effects of Performance-based HRM System on the Workers' Creativity and Routine Job Performance, Master's Degree Dissertation Dong-A University, 2013.
  9. Chung, D.Y., and Kim, M.S., The Effect of Super-Leadership & Self-Leadership with LMX on Group Performance : Based on a nonprofit organization, Korean Academy of Management Summer Integrated Conference, 2009, Vol. 2, pp. 29-50.
  10. Davis, F.D., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 1989, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  11. Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C.Y., and Hong, Y.Y., Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions : A World from Two Perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 1995, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
  12. Gell-Mann, M., What is Complexity?, Complexity, 1995, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.6130010105
  13. Hong S.N., Hong Y.G., Business Communication, Hanol Publisher, 2001.
  14. Hong, D.P., Diffusion of Knowledge within a Global Company : Focusing on Innovation Know-how Transfer to Subsidiaries, [Ph.D. Dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : Yonsei University, 2003.
  15. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., and Cavaye, A.L. M., Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms : A Structural Equation Model, MIS Quaterly, 1997, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 279-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498
  16. Jung, H.S., Korean and American Language Differences : Focusing on the Problems in the Communication Case Studies of Multicultural Organizations, The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 2002, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 275-293.
  17. Jung, M.U., 8 People, Architectural Design and Human Behavior Psychology, Kimoondang, 2004.
  18. Katz, D., and Kahn, R.L., Organizations and the System Concept, The Social Psychology of Organizations, 1978, Vol. 1, pp. 14-29.
  19. Kim, H.I, A Study on the Conflict and Alleviating Measures between the Medical Department and the Inspection Department of a Hospital, [Master's Degree Dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : Kyung Hee University, 1999.
  20. Kim, J.H., A Study on the Cognition to the Ideological Space Effected by Window in Architectural Space, [Master's Degree Dissertation], [Chungcheongnam-do, Korea] : Namseoul University, 2006.
  21. Kwon, J.M., Complexity Theory and Special Education, Special Education, 2009, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 279-293. https://doi.org/10.18541/ser.2009.09.8.2.279
  22. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11 (Eds.), Merriam-Webster Inc, 2004.
  23. Naver Korean Dictionary, 2018.
  24. Nicholson, N., The Moral Order of the Organization : Directions for Theory and Research, Organization, 1995, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849522014
  25. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory, New York. Mcgraw-Hill, 1967.
  26. Park, H.S., The Influence of Financial Planner's Self-Leadership on the Job performance and Job satisfaction, [Master's Degree Dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : Ewha Womans University, 2011.
  27. Park, S.J., A Study on the Leisure Life and Job Products by 5 Day Work Week System : Focused on Civil Servants in Gyeryong and Nonsan City, [Master's Degree Dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : Konyang University, 2007.
  28. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension, University of Chicago Press, 2009.
  29. Price, J.L., The Study of Organizational Effectiveness, Sociological Quarterly, 2008, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1972.tb02100.x
  30. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed, New York : Free Press, 1995.
  31. Singh, J. and Rhoads, G.K., Boundary Role Ambiguity in Marketing Oriented Positions : A Multidimensional, Multifaceted Operationalization, Journal of Marketing Research, 1991, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800307
  32. Sternberg, R.J., Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607
  33. Szilagyi, A.D. and Wallace, M.J., Organizational Behavior and Performance, 3rd ed. Glenview : Scott, Foresman and Company, 1990.
  34. Williams, L.J., and Anderson, S.E., Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors, Journal of Management, 1991, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  35. Yoshinaga, Y., Complex System, Seoul: Korea Economic Daily, 1997.
  36. Yun, H.K., The Research on Development & Effect of Indicator for Measuring Work-Knowhow, [Master's Degree Dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : University of Seoul, 2012.