디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권9호
  • /
  • Pages.451-469
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주민주도성에 대한 사회복지사와 주민간 인식 차이에 관한 연구

Difference Analysis between Social Workers and Community Members about Perception of Citizen-Initiative

  • 장연진 (한양사이버대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 강규태 (반포종합사회복지관) ;
  • 하은솔 (서울대학교 사회복지학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.05
  • 심사 : 2019.09.20
  • 발행 : 2019.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 주민주도성에 대한 사회복지사와 주민 간의 인식 차이를 분석한 연구이다. 이를 위해, 10명의 지역조직화 사업 담당 사회복지사와 2년 이상 지역사회 활동에 참여한 10명의 주민을 대상으로, 주민주도성에 대한 59개의 문장의 중요도와 난이도를 평정한 결과를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 사회복지사와 주민 간의 인식 차이는 전반적으로 중요도 인식보다 난이도 인식에서 더 크게 나타났으며, 예산과 외부 재정적 지원에 대해서는 사회복지사와 주민 모두 난이도가 높다고 응답하였다. 59개 문장에 대한 범주별 분석 결과에서는 절차 범주 내의 목표와 책임, 민주적 체계에서 사회복지사와 주민 간의 인식의 차이가 크게 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 향후 지역사회복지관에서 주민주도성에 대한 합의와 공통적 개념 정의를 이끌어내는 데 필요한 방안들을 제안하였다.

The purpose of this study is to find developing way of community welfare aimed community-initiative by analyzing differential perception of citizen-initiative between social workers and community members. For this purpose, this study did a difference analysis on self-rating result of importance and difficulty in 59 statements about the citizen-initiative. Participants were 10 social workers in charge of community center over 2 years and 10 community members joined in community group over 2 years. The results are as follows. Differential perception between social workers and community members appeared both importance and difficulty. Especially, differential perception in difficulty was bigger. The statements that social workers as well as community members answered high level of difficulty were related with securing budget and external financial support. As the analysis of categorized statements, the differential perception in 'Goal and responsibility' and 'Democratic system' in procedural aspects were statistically significant. Based on these results, this study presented practical suggestions to make consensus about citizen-initiative in community organization.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. C. B. Yoo. (2015). 2nd Community Policy in Seoul: Citizen-initiative and Making Community Ecosystem. Agricultural Administration, 55, 29-52.
  2. H. J. Cho & D. C., Yoo. (2014). The Investigatory Study about The Project Process of Community Building Leaded by Community Welfare Centers. Korean journal of social welfare, 66(3), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2014.66.3.007
  3. Seoul Welfare Foundation. (2015). Research on Building of Social Welfare Organization' Role for Community Welfare Power. Seoul: Seoul Welfare Foundation.
  4. Y. J. Jang & E. S. Ha. (2018). A Study on Concept Mapping of the Citizen-initiative. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 49(1), 163-190. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2018.49.1.163
  5. Banpo Community Welfare Center. (2017). A Study on Concept Analysis of Citizen-initiative. 2017 Field Study Paper of Welfare Community, 101-182, Seoul: Seoul Welfare Foundation.
  6. J. D. Kim & Y. J. Jang. (2015). A study on Difference of Workers' Perception about Educational Welfare. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 22(1), 235-265.
  7. Seoul Special City. (2012). Master Plan of Village Community in Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Special City.
  8. Seoul Welfare Foundation. (2016). Evaluation Index of Community Welfare Center in Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Welfare Foundation.
  9. Y. R. Shin (2018). The Exploring Study about the Experience of Project of Community Building leaded by Community Welfare Center in Busan. Hangdo Busan, 36, 355-392. https://doi.org/10.19169/hd.2018.8.36.355
  10. Citizen Autonomy Editorial Department. (2018). In Kwangju City, Citizen-Initiative Communities are blown. Monthly Citizen Autonomy, 76, 130.
  11. Citizen Autonomy Editorial Department. (2018). Tapyung Moonlight Music Festival records huge success, initiated by Citizen From Plan to Execution. Monthly Citizen Autonomy, 79, 46-47.
  12. Y. O. Jeon. (2017). A Study on the Role of Service Design in Creating Resident-driven Safe Community. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(6), 407-414. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.6.407
  13. S. K. Kim & S. Y. Lee. (2007). Community making model initiated by Local people. Wonju: Korean Research Institute for Local Administration.
  14. K. S. Kim. (2014). The Effect of Urban Regeneration on the Village Satisfaction and Community Spirit of the Citizens of Seoul. Journal of Public Society, 4(1), 66-92.
  15. A. Boehm & R. A. Cnaan. (2012). Towards a Practice-based Model for Community Practice: Linking Theory and Practice. Journal of Sociology and Social welfare, 39, 141-168.
  16. B. Checkoway. (1995). Six Strategies of Community Change. Community Development Journal, 30(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/30.1.2
  17. S. R. Arnstein. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. JAIP, 35(4), 216-224.
  18. N. S. Kim. (2019). Difference between Employees and Users of Welfare Institutions for the Disabled in Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 405-412. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.405
  19. J. S. Kim. (2017). A Comparison of Assessment of Child Friendly Cities by Parents and Child Service Providers in Selected Local Government. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(11), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.11.49
  20. J. T Jung & K. S. Kim. (2014). The Attitude on Introduction Method of In-Program Advertising in Terrestrial Broadcasting Television : Comparison of Public and Professional Awareness. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(1), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2014.12.1.263
  21. J. T. Jung. (2015). The Attitude on Introduction for Total Amount in Terrestrial Broadcasting Television : Comparison of Public and Professional Awareness. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(1), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.205
  22. S. J. Choi. (2008). About Supportive Project For the Priority Region of Educational Welfare Investment Recognition of Educational Subject. CheonBuk National University, Jeonju.
  23. Y. J. Kim. (2010). Analysis of Class Teacher's and Community Education Specialist's Cognitive Difference Toward Supportive Project for the Priority Region of Educational Welfare Investment. Master's thesis. Pusan National University, Pusan.
  24. H. K. Lee & L. Fan (2016). The Role of Local Government for the Revitalization of Local Grassroots Community. Korean Governance Review, 23(1), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2016.23.1.008
  25. S. M. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Successful Types of Community(Maeul) Building Perceived by Maeul Community Participants. Master's thesis. Kyungnam University, Changwon.
  26. Myeon Mok Community Welfare Center. (2018). 2017 Qualitative Evaluation Report of organizational restructuring focusing village. Seoul: Myeon Mok Community Welfare Center.
  27. M. Kane & W. M. Trochim. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation(Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  28. K. M. Kim & J. Y. Yoon. (2010). Constructing Practice of Strength Based Case Management : Using Concept-Mapping Method. Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 28, 93-118.
  29. S. W. Lim. (2012). Concepting Study on Duty of Paid Severely Disabled Activist in Self-Support Center. Reinterpretation of Disorder, 45-78.
  30. H. Y. Kim, J. Y. Lee & J. Y Jang (2013). Concept Mapping of Factors Contributing to Successful Counseling for Parents of Children with Disabilities. Journal of Youth Welfare, 15(2), 227-246.
  31. Y. M. Park. (2009). Using Concept Mapping for Predicting the Performance of Long-Term Care. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 47(4), 255-278.
  32. J. K. Lim (2013). Using Concept Mapping for Measuring the Quality of Long-Term Care Service. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Research, 34, 73-100.
  33. T. G. Yoo. (2013). Statistics for Social Welfare Research. Koyang: Knowledge Community.
  34. M. Y. Um. (2007). Nonparametric Statistics for Social Workers. Paju: jipmoondang.
  35. G. D. Ahn, S. H. Park & S. Jung. (2012). A Study on Changed Experience of Community Organizing Members in Community Service Center-Social Constructive Analysis Focusing Neighborhood and Community Organizing Model-. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 64(1), 5-30.
  36. Y. A. Kim, K. H. Yoon, Y. S. Shin & S. H. Han. (2017). A Study on Change of Community Welfare Center through Support Project for Village Community. 2016 Social Work Practice Research Report. (pp. 47-64). Bucheon: Korean Council of Social Welfare Organization by University.
  37. I. H. Kim. (2006). A Study on the Concept of Education Welfare. the Journal of Educational Administration, 24(3), 289-314.
  38. H. O Jung & S. W. Han. (2018). A Concept Analysis of Prisoner Corrrection. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(10), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.10.357
  39. H. I. Kim. (2015). An exploratory study for conceptualizing a communication model in choral music. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(7), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.7.413
  40. N. E. Lee & J. W Choi. (2018). Analysis on Constructs Concept of University Athletes' Self Management. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(8), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.8.247
  41. H. K. Cho & M. S. Song. (2018). Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Korean Cancer Survivors' Happiness. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(8), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.8.365
  42. S. H Lee & Y. Y. Choi. (2018). A Study on Practical Recognition about Rights Advocacy of Social Workers in Disabled Welfare Centers. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 265-271. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.6.265
  43. J. H. Jeon & S. H. Lee. (2019). A Study on the Citizen Advocates' Perception of Their Role for People with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(3), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.3.112