디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권9호
  • /
  • Pages.407-420
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

언어분석을 이용한 광고효과 탐색연구 : KLIWC를 중심으로

An Exploratory Study on Advertising Effectiveness Using Linguistic Analysis: Focused on KLIWC

  • 투고 : 2019.07.18
  • 심사 : 2019.09.20
  • 발행 : 2019.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 광고평가글을 이용해 광고효과를 측정할 수 있는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 온라인을 통해 연구에 참여한 대학생 384명을 대상으로 고관여와 저관여 제품의 긍 부정 평가 광고에 대한 광고평가를 자기보고식으로 측정하고, 광고평가글을 작성하도록 하였다. 작성된 광고평가글을 KLIWC으로 분석하여 긍 부정 평가 광고 간의 차이를 살펴보았다. 분석결과, 심리사회적 변인들 중 17개 변인들에서 긍 부정 광고 간에 유의미한 차이가 나타났으며, 9개의 언어학적 변인들에서 긍 부정 광고 간에 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 또한 긍정정서, 부정정서, 제한, 확신, 신체상태와 기능, 수면/꿈 등은 광고태도, 제품태도, 구매의도와 유의미한 상관이 나타났다. 본 연구는 광고평가글이 광고에 대한 소비자의 심리적 반응을 반영하고, 광고평가글을 통한 광고효과 측정이 가능함을 시사해주고 있다.

The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of measuring advertising effectiveness through the ad evaluation text. The 384 university students were asked to evaluate the positive and negative evaluation ads of high and low involvement products by self-report method and to write ad evaluation text online. The written ad evaluation text were analyzed by KLIWC and to examine the difference between the comment of positive and negative advertising. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, there were differences between positive and negative ads in 17 psychosocial variables. Second, there were differences between positive and negative ads in 9 linguistic variables. Third, there was a significant correlation between KLIWC variables(Positive & negative emotions, inhibition, conviction, physical condition & function and sleep/dreams) and advertising effect variables. This study suggests that the advertising evaluation comment reflects the consumer's psychological reaction to advertising and the possibility of measuring the advertising effectiveness using advertising evaluation text.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. D. W. Kim, M. I. Choi & S. Y. Kim. (2013). Exploring Advertising and Public Relations Research in Korea : Using Semantic Network Analysis Across Different Time Periods From 1988 to 2012. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 24(6), 95-120.
  2. D. Vakratsas & Z. Ma. (2005). A look at the long-run effectiveness of multimedia advertising and its implications for budget allocation decisions. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(2). 241-254. DOI : 10.1017/s0021849905050269.
  3. J. Haskins & A. Kendrick. (1993). Successful advertising research methods. USA : NTC.
  4. H. S. Park. (1999). Media planning and evaluation procedures of South Korea advertising practitioners. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 10(3), 105-122.
  5. H. S. Park. (2013). Advertising media planning(3rd edition). Seoul: Hankyung Corp.
  6. T. S. Oh. (1994). Persuasion theory and advertising. Seoul: Nanam Publishing Company.
  7. J. T. Cacioppo & C. A. Sandman. (1981). Psychophysical functioning, cognitive responding, and attitudes. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brook (Eds.), Cognitive response in persuasion (81-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  8. D. J. O'Keefe. (2002). Persuasion: Theory & Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CAL: Sage Publications.
  9. W. D. Wells. (1964). EQ, Son of EQ, and the reaction profile. The Journal of Marketing, 28(4), 45-52. DOI : 10.2307/1249570.
  10. J. M. Park & C. H. Lee. (2011). Differences of Language Styles in South and North Korea's Broadcasting Drama Analyzed by K(Korean)-LIWC. Broadcasting & Communication, 12(3), 5-30.
  11. G. H. Lee, N. J. Kang & J. Y. Lee. (2008). The Study on Rhetoric ofP resident Moo-Hyun Noh in Impeachment Period : Focusiog on Computerized Text Analysis Program. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 52(5), 25-55.
  12. R. J. Ballotti, Jr & L. L. Kaid (2000). Examining verbal style in presidential campaign spots. Communication Studies, 51, 258-273. DOI : 10.1080/10510970009388523.
  13. P. L. Wright. (1973). The cognitive process mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 53-67. DOI : 10.2307/3149409.
  14. W. S. Gim. (2000). Advertising Psychology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  15. S. B. MacKenzie, R. J. Lutz& G. E. Belch. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130-143. DOI : 10.2307/3151660.
  16. Hastak, M. T. & Olson, J. C.(1989). Assessing the role of brand-related cognitive responses as mediators of communication effects in cognitive structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 444-456. DOI : 10.1086/209184.
  17. J. C. Olson, D. R. Toy & P. A. Dover. (1982). Do cognitive responses mediate the effects of advertising content on cognitive structure? Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 245-262. DOI : 10.1086/208921
  18. R. Batra & M. L. Ray. (1986). Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 234-249. DOI : 10.1086/209063.
  19. M. C. Burke & J. A. Edell. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-baseded affect and cognition. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 69-83. DOI : 10.1177/002224378902600106.
  20. D. Aaker & D. Bruzzone. (1981). Viewer perceptions of prime-time television advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(5), 15-23.
  21. M. J. Schlinger. (1979). A Profile of Responses to Commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 19(2), 37-48.
  22. W. D. Wells, C. Leavitt & M. McConville. (1971). A reaction profile for tv commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 11(6), 11-17.
  23. S. K. Nam. (2009). Development and Validation of Scale for Advertising Response and Evaluation. Korea Advertising Society, 20(4), 251-262.
  24. S. K. Nam. (2011). Strategy for Raising Advertising Effect based on Dimensions of Advertising Responses and Evaluations. Korea Advertising Society, 22(8), 45-58.
  25. C. J. Yoo. (2000). Study on the effects of evaluative factors of advertising. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 11(1), 35-51.
  26. W. S. Gim. (1989). A Study on the Dimensions of Consumer Responses to Commercials (2) : Cognitive Evaluations and Affective Responses. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 44-66.
  27. R. J. Lutz, S. B. Mcakenzie & G. E. Belch. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as mediator of advertising effectiveness: determinants and consequences. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 532-539.
  28. R. P. Hart. (2001). Redeveloping DICTION: Theoretical considerations. In M. D. West (Ed.), Theory, method and practice of computer content analysis(43-60). Westport, CT: Ablex.
  29. E. Mergenthaler. (1996). Emotion-abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing psychotherapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1306-1315. DOI : 10.1037/0022-006x.64.6.1306.
  30. R. L. Pinkley. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 117-126. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.117.
  31. W. Weintraub. (1989). Verbal behavior in everyday life. NY: Springer.
  32. Y. I. Kim, Y. J. Kim, Y. J. Kim & K. Y. Kim. (2019). The Characteristics of Malicious Comments: Comparisons of the Internet News Comments in Korean and English. The Korea Contents Society, 19(1), 548-558.
  33. E. A Park & Y. H. Jee. (2019). Advertising effects of tendency of Facebook user's writing 'comment' and the number of 'like' in posting. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(7), 109-114. DOI : doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.7.109.
  34. J. K. Lee, K. J. Lee & J. S. Yang. (2019). Analysis of a Causal Relationship between Collective Emotion and Behavior to Sport Issues in SNS. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(2), 165-171. DOI : https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.2.165.
  35. K. S. Park, G. O. Lee & M. I. Choi. (2014). A semantic network analysis of news reports on an emerging infectious disease by multidrug-resistant microorganism. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(2), 343-351. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.343.
  36. M. H. Hwang & J. S. Park. (2014). Lexical and Phrasal Analysis of Online Discourse of Type 2 Diabetes Patients based on Text-Mining. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 655-667. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.655.
  37. J. S. Shim. (2012). Comparison of Conflict Frames between Local Residents and Bureaucrats over Construction of the Jeju Naval Base. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 50(4), 221-249.
  38. W. G. Kang, E. S. Ko, H. R. Lee & J. N. Kim. (2018). A Study of the Consumer Major Perception of Packaging Using Big Data Analysis-Focusing on Text Mining and Semantic Network Analysis. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(4), 15-22. DOI : doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.4.015.
  39. M. J Jung, Y. L. Lee, C. M. Yoo, J. W. Kim & J. E Chung. (2019). An exploratory study on consumers' responses to mobile payment service focused on Samsung Pay. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(1), 9-27. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.1.009.
  40. Q. Ye, R. Law, B. Gu & W. Chen. (2011). The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 634-639. DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.014.
  41. J. W. Pennebaker & L. A. King. (1999). Linguistic styles : Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312. DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296.
  42. G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 558-568. DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558.
  43. R. Burk, A. Chappell, M. Gregory, C. Joslyn & L. McGrath. (2012). Pattern Discovery Using Semantic Network Analysis. Proceeding of Third International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing (CIP), May 28-30, 2012, Baiona, Spain. IEEE. DOI : 10.1109/cip.2012.6232917.
  44. E. J. Yuan, M. Feng & J, A. Danowski. (2013). Privacy in semantic networks on chinese social media: The case of Sina Weibo. Journal of Communication, 63(6), 1011-1031. DOI : 10.1111/jcom.12058.
  45. J. W. Pennebaker. (1997). Writing about emotional experience as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162-166. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x.
  46. J. W. Pennebaker, T. J. Mayne & M. E. Francis. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 863-871. DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.72.4.863.
  47. S. S. Rude, E. M. Gortner & J. W. Pennebaker. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121-1133. DOI : 10.1080/02699930441000030.
  48. R. M. Mehl & J. W. Pennebaker. (2003). The social dynamics of a cultural upheaval : Everyday social life in the aftermath of the September 11 attack on America. Psychological Science, 14, 579-585. DOI : 10.1037/e633872013-262.
  49. S. W. Stirman & J. W. Pennebaker. (2001). Word use in the poetry of suicidal and non-suicidal poets. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(4), 517-522. DOI : 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00001
  50. M. L. Newman, J. W. Pennebaker, D. S. Berry & J. M. Richards. (2003). Lying words : Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665-675. DOI : 10.1177/0146167203029005010.
  51. C. H. Lee, J. M. Sim, & A. S. Yoon. (2005). The Review about the Development of Korean Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 16(2), 93-121.
  52. J. H. Lee. (2012). An Analytical Study of Language used by Group Members vs Group Leaders Manifested in the Integral Group Verbatim. Korea Journal of Counseling, 13(4), 1609-1629. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.13.4.201208.1609
  53. S. J. Kim & K. H. Kim. (2005). Effects of self-disclosure and moderating effect of hostility for children in elementary school. Korean journal of health psychology, 10(1), 47-65.
  54. J. W. Lee & C. H. Hong. (2010). A Comparison of The Korean-Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Program and Insight Level and Emotional Expression Level Scales as Psychotherapy Analytical Tools. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(4), 1009-1028. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2010.29.4.006
  55. J. H. Seo & K. Y. Kim. (2009). Analyses of the Linguistic and Psychological Characteristics in the Writings of Sexual Criminals. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 11(2), 717-730.
  56. J. M. Park, J. J. Park & C. H. Lee. (2007). A Historical Content Analysis of Korean Advertising Languages from 1960s to 2005. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 51(5), 394-425.
  57. J. J. Park, C. H. Lee & J. M. Park. (2008). A longitudinal analysis of advertising languages : Focused on magazine advertisements from 1960's to present. The Korea Journal of Advertising, 19(4), 29-41.
  58. Y. J. Ryu. (2016). The study of online deceptive consumer reviews using KLIWC. Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(1), 69-92.
  59. J. H. Seo, K. Y. Kim, C. H. Lee & K. Y. Kim. (2012). Linguistic and Psychological Characteristics of Homicide Language and Personality Profiling using the KLIWC Program. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 14(3), 1355-1371.
  60. Y. I. Kim, Y. J. Kim & K. Y. Kim. (2016). Detecting a deceptive attitude in non-pressure situations using K-LIWC. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 27(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2016.27.2.003
  61. K. I. Kim, J. H. Bae, Y. J. Kim & D. K. Kim. (2011). Preliminary Analysis of the Relationship between Language Use and Subjective Well-being. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 12(11), 4875-4880. DOI : dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.11.4875
  62. M. A. Cohn, M. R. Mehl & J. W. Pennebaker. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687-693. DOI : doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x.
  63. I. Blair. (2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: On the tenure and future of social cognition (pp. 359-374). Nahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  64. J. F. Dovidio, K. Kawakami & S. L. Gaertner. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62-68. DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.62
  65. W. Hofmann, B. Gawronski, T. Gschwendner, H. Le & M. Schmitt. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385. DOI : 10.1177/0146167205275613.
  66. S. H. Lee, J. A. Ahn, I. H. Jeong & K. H. Kim. (2011). Analysis for the Difference Between Skin Conductance and facial EMG and Self-reported Responses. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(4), 7-33.