Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of nanofillers on the properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives

  • Received : 2019.02.14
  • Accepted : 2019.06.30
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different concentrations of nanofillers on the chemical and physical properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives. Materials and Methods: Eight experimental adhesives were prepared with different nanofiller concentrations (0, 1, 2, and 4 wt%) and 2 solvent concentrations (0% and 10% ethanol). Several properties of the experimental adhesives were evaluated, such as water sorption and solubility (n = 5, 20 seconds light activation), real-time degree of conversion (DC; n = 3, 20 and 40 seconds light activation), and stability of cohesive strength at 6 months (CS; n = 20, 20 seconds light activation) using the microtensile test. A light-emitting diode (Bluephase 20i, Ivoclar Vivadent) with an average light emittance of $1,200mW/cm^2$ was used. Results: The presence of solvent reduced the DC after 20 seconds of curing, but increased the final DC, water sorption, and solubility of the adhesives. Storage in water reduced the strength of the adhesives. The addition of 1 wt% and 2 wt% nanofillers increased the polymerization rate of the adhesives. Conclusions: The presence of nanofillers and ethanol improved the final DC, although the DC of the solvated adhesives at 20 seconds was lower than that of the non-solvated adhesives. The presence of ethanol reduced the strength of the adhesives and increased their water sorption and solubility. However, nanofillers did not affect the water sorption and strength of the tested adhesives.

Keywords

References

  1. Collares K, Opdam NJ, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Demarco FF, Correa MB, Huysmans MC. Longevity of anterior composite restorations in a general dental practice-based network. J Dent Res 2017;96:1092-1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517717681
  2. Rauch A, Reich S, Dalchau L, Schierz O. Clinical survival of chair-side generated monolithic lithium disilicate crowns:10-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1763-1769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2271-3
  3. Amaral M, Coppo PP, Rosalem CG, Suaid FF, Guerra SM. A 3-year retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Braz Dent J 2015;26:619-623. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300310
  4. Dressano D, Palialol AR, Xavier TA, Braga RR, Oxman JD, Watts DC, Marchi GM, Lima AF. Effect of diphenyliodonium hexafluorophosphate on the physical and chemical properties of ethanolic solvated resins containing camphorquinone and 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione sensitizers as initiators. Dent Mater 2016;32:756-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.010
  5. Bertolo MV, Moraes RC, Pfeifer C, Salgado VE, Correr AR, Schneider LF. Influence of photoinitiator system on physical-chemical properties of experimental self-adhesive composites. Braz Dent J 2017;28:35-39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201700841
  6. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of selected components on crosslink density in polymer structures. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:282-285. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00057.x
  7. Bicalho AA, Pereira RD, Zanatta RF, Franco SD, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ. Incremental filling technique and composite material--part I: cuspal deformation, bond strength, and physical properties. Oper Dent 2014;39:E71-E82. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-441-L
  8. Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater 2013;29:116-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004
  9. Habekost LV, Camacho GB, Lima GS, Ogliari FA, Cubas GB, Moraes RR. Nanoparticle loading level and properties of experimental hybrid resin luting agents. J Prosthodont 2012;21:540-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00867.x
  10. Conde MC, Zanchi CH, Rodrigues-Junior SA, Carreno NL, Ogliari FA, Piva E. Nanofiller loading level: Influence on selected properties of an adhesive resin. J Dent 2009;37:331-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.001
  11. Belli R, Kreppel S, Petschelt A, Hornberger H, Boccaccini AR, Lohbauer U. Strengthening of dental adhesives via particle reinforcement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;37:100-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.007
  12. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016
  13. Mousavinasab SM, Atai M, Barekatain M, Fattahi P, Fattahi A, Rakhshan V. Effects of ethanol concentrations of acrylate-based dental adhesives on microtensile composite-dentin bond strength and hybrid layer structure of a 10 wt% polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-incorporated bonding agent. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018;15:25-32. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.223615
  14. Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Navarra CO, Mazzoni A, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH. Degree of conversion of resin blends in relation to ethanol content and hydrophilicity. Dent Mater 2008;24:1194-1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.012
  15. Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Rueggeberg FA, Suchko M, Grodin E, Agee K, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Effects of residual ethanol on the rate and degree of conversion of five experimental resins. Dent Mater 2009;25:621-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.005
  16. Fu J, Saikaew P, Kawano S, Carvalho RM, Hannig M, Sano H, Selimovic D. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2017;33:895-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015
  17. Gaglianone LA, Lima AF, Goncalves LS, Cavalcanti AN, Aguiar FH, Marchi GM. Mechanical properties and degree of conversion of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems cured by a quartz tungsten halogen lamp and a light-emitting diode. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;12:139-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.018
  18. Collares K, Correa MB, Laske M, Kramer E, Reiss B, Moraes RR, Huysmans MC, Opdam NJ. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations. Dent Mater 2016;32:687-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.02.006
  19. Azad E, Atai M, Zandi M, Shokrollahi P, Solhi L. Structure-properties relationships in dental adhesives: effect of initiator, matrix monomer structure, and nano-filler incorporation. Dent Mater 2018;34:1263-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.013
  20. Solhi L, Atai M, Nodehi A, Imani M, Ghaemi A, Khosravi K. Poly(acrylic acid) grafted montmorillonite as novel fillers for dental adhesives: synthesis, characterization and properties of the adhesive. Dent Mater 2012;28:369-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.010
  21. Sadat-Shojai M, Atai M, Nodehi A, Khanlar LN. Hydroxyapatite nanorods as novel fillers for improving the properties of dental adhesives: synthesis and application. Dent Mater 2010;26:471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.005
  22. Atai M, Solhi L, Nodehi A, Mirabedini SM, Kasraei S, Akbari K, Babanzadeh S. PMMA-grafted nanoclay as novel filler for dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2009;25:339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.005
  23. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049:2009-10. Dentistry-Polymer-based restorative materials [Internet]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2009 [cited 2019 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/42898.html. (updated 2009 Oct).
  24. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  25. Matinlinna JP, Lung CY, Tsoi JK. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: a review. Dent Mater 2018;34:13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002
  26. Kumar SR, Bhat IK, Patnaik A. Novel dental composite material reinforced with silane functionalized microsized gypsum filler particles. Polym Compos 2017;38:404-415. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23599
  27. Ye Q, Spencer P, Wang Y, Misra A. Relationship of solvent to the photopolymerization process, properties, and structure in model dentin adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80A:342-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30890
  28. Malacarne-Zanon J, Pashley DH, Agee KA, Foulger S, Alves MC, Breschi L, Cadenaro M, Garcia FP, Carrilho MR. Effects of ethanol addition on the water sorption/solubility and percent conversion of comonomers in model dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2009;25:1275-1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.015
  29. Mousavinasab SM, Atai M, Alavi B. To compare the microleakage among experimental adhesives containing nanoclay fillers after the storages of 24 hours and 6 months. Open Dent J 2011;5:52-57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010052