Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A CAD/CAM-based strategy for concurrent endodontic and restorative treatment

  • Escobar, Patricia Maria (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Kishen, Anil (Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto) ;
  • Lopes, Fabiane Carneiro (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Borges, Caroline Cristina (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Kegler, Eugenio Gabriel (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo)
  • Received : 2019.03.14
  • Accepted : 2019.06.22
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This case report describes a technique in which endodontic treatment and permanent indirect restoration were completed in the same clinical appointment with the aid of a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. Two patients were diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular first molar. After access preparation, root canals were located, irrigation was performed until bleeding ceased, and the coronal tooth structure was prepared for indirect restoration. Then, utilizing an interim 3-mm build-up of the endodontic access cavity, a hemi-arch digital scan was performed with an intraoral scanner. Subsequent to digital scanning, restoration design was performed simultaneously with the endodontic procedure. The root canals were shaped using the Race system under irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by root canal filling. The pulp chamber was subsequently filled with a 3-mm-thick composite resin restoration mimicking the interim build-up previously utilized to facilitate block milling in the CAD/CAM system. Clinical try-in of the permanent onlay restoration was followed by acid etching, application of a 5th generation adhesive, and cementation of the indirect restoration. Once the restoration was cemented, rubber dam isolation was removed, followed by occlusal adjustment and polishing. After 2 years of follow-up, the restorations were esthetically and functionally satisfactory, without complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Pratt I, Aminoshariae A, Montagnese TA, Williams KA, Khalighinejad N, Mickel A. Eight-year retrospective study of the critical time lapse between root canal completion and crown placement: its influence on the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2016;42:1598-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.006
  2. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Recurrent apical periodontitis and late endodontic treatment failure related to coronal leakage: a case report. J Endod 2011;37:1171-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.025
  3. Rocca GT, Krejci I. Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated posterior teeth: from direct composite to endocrowns. Eur J Esthet Dent 2013;8:156-179.
  4. Marzouk MA, Simonton AL, Gross RD. Designs of cavity and tooth preparations for cast restorations. Operative dentistry, modern theory and practice. 1st Indian ed. Chennai: All India Publishers and Distributors; 1997. p1-326.
  5. Kollmuss M, Kist S, Goeke JE, Hickel R, Huth KC. Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:791-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1554-9
  6. Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The effect of resin bonding on long-term success of high-strength ceramics. J Dent Res 2018;97:132-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517729134
  7. Benk J. Conservative restorative treatment using a single-visit, all-ceramic CAD/CAM system. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007;19:35-40.
  8. Vafiadis D, Goldstein G. Single visit fabrication of a porcelain laminate veneer with CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:71-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)00100-4
  9. Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F. The Cerec system: computer-assisted preparation of direct ceramic inlays in 1 setting. Quintessenz 1987;38:457-470.
  10. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003
  11. Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, Grosgogeat B. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:384-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.001
  12. Manfredi M, Figini L, Gagliani M, Lodi G. Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;12:CD005296.
  13. Yee K, Bhagavatula P, Stover S, Eichmiller F, Hashimoto L, MacDonald S, Barkley G 3rd. survival rates of teeth with primary endodontic treatment after core/post and crown placement. J Endod 2018;44:220-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.034
  14. Gesi A, Hakeberg M, Warfvinge J, Bergenholtz G. Incidence of periapical lesions and clinical symptoms after pulpectomy--a clinical and radiographic evaluation of 1- versus 2-session treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.073
  15. Pimentel Correa AC, Cecchin D, de Almeida JF, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC. Sodium thiosulfate for recovery of bond strength to dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2016;42:284-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.010
  16. Chandrashekhar S, Patil S, Abraham S, Mehta D, Chaudhari S, Shashidhar J. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of composite resin to pulp chamber dentin treated with sodium thiosulfate and proanthocyanidin: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:671-675. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_160_18
  17. Khullar P, Raisingani D, Gupta S, Khatri RK. A survey report on effect of root canal fillings and coronal restorations on the periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in a selected group of population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6:89-94. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1196
  18. Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x
  19. Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991;17:338-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81702-4
  20. Landys Boren D, Jonasson P, Kvist T. Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth at a public dental specialist clinic. J Endod 2015;41:176-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.002
  21. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80337-3
  22. van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent 1996;24:389-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00098-4
  23. Southard DW. Immediate core buildup of endodontically treated teeth: the rest of the seal. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:519-526.
  24. Goldfein J, Speirs C, Finkelman M, Amato R. Rubber dam use during post placement influences the success of root canal-treated teeth. J Endod 2013;39:1481-1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.036
  25. Yadav K, De Ataide IN, Fernandes M, Lambor R, Alreja D. Endodontic management of a mandibular first molar with radix entomolaris and conservative post-endodontic restoration with CAD/CAM onlay: a novel clinical technique. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZD13-ZD15.
  26. Siqueira JF JrRocas IN, Lopes HP, Alves FRF, Oliveira JCM, Armada L, Provenzano JC. Biological principles of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital pulp. Rev Bras Odontol 2011;68:161-165.
  27. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  28. Pasqualini D, Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, Paolino DS, Bianchi CC, Roggia A, Scotti N, Berutti E. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRaCe shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals. J Endod 2015;41:1706-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.002
  29. da Silva Limoeiro AG, Dos Santos AH, De Martin AS, Kato AS, Fontana CE, Gavini G, Freire LG, da Silveira Bueno CE. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of 2 nickel-titanium instrument systems in shaping root canals. J Endod 2016;42:496-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.007
  30. Weine F. Endodontic therapy. 1st ed. St. Louis (MO): C.V. Mosby; 1972. p209-222.
  31. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod 2004;30:425-428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00012
  32. de Azevedo Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T. The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background. Eur J Dent 2011;5:245-252. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698888
  33. Murgueitio R, Bernal G. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns. J Prosthodont 2012;21:340-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00837.x
  34. Huth KC, Chen HY, Mehl A, Hickel R, Manhart J. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years. J Dent 2011;39:478-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.005
  35. Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent 2004;29:60-68.
  36. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Am J Dent 2002;15:389-394.
  37. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI commission project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000;50:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x
  38. Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength on ceramic-resin adhesion using two specimen testing substrates. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;54:165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.06.003
  39. Sandoval MJ, Rocca GT, Krejci I, Mandikos M, Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2167-2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1449-9
  40. Arrais CA, Miyake K, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH, Giannini M. Micromorphology of resin/dentin interfaces using 4th and 5th generation dual-curing adhesive/cement systems: a confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:15-26.
  41. Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M, Magne P. Influence of adhesive core buildup designs on the resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent 2016;41:76-82. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-277-L
  42. Teruya JI, Correa MS. Adesao a estrutura dental. In: Correa MSNP, editor. Odontopediatria na primeira infancia. Sao Paulo: Santos; 2001. p413-429.
  43. Ernest CP, Holzmeier M, Willershausen B. In vitro shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives in comparison to 4th and 5th generation adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:293-299.
  44. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-258.
  45. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:295-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x