DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new minimally invasive guided endodontic microsurgery by cone beam computed tomography and 3-dimensional printing technology

  • Kim, Jong-Eun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shin, Yooseok (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center and Microscope Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2019.07.13
  • Accepted : 2019.07.18
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Endodontic microsurgery is defined as the treatment performed on the root apices of an infected tooth, which was unresolved with conventional root canal therapy. Recently, the advanced technology in 3-dimensional model reconstruction based on computed tomography such as cone beam computed tomography has opened a new avenue in application of personalized, accurate diagnosis and has been increasingly used in the field of dentistry. Nevertheless, direct intra-oral localization of root apex based on the 3-dimensional information is extremely difficult and significant amount of bone removal is inevitable when freehand surgical procedure was employed. Moreover, gingival flap and alveolar bone fenestration are usually required, which leads to prolonged time of surgery, thereby increasing the chance of trauma as well as the risk of infection. The purpose of this case report is to present endodontic microsurgery using the guide template that can accurately target the position of apex for the treatment of an anterior tooth with calcified canal which was untreatable with conventional root canal therapy and unable to track the position of the apex due to the absence of fistula.

Keywords

References

  1. von Arx T, Walker WA 3rd. Microsurgical instruments for root-end cavity preparation following apicoectomy: a literature review. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:47-62. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016002047.x
  2. Pinsky HM, Champleboux G, Sarment DP. Periapical surgery using CAD/CAM guidance: preclinical results. J Endod 2007;33:148-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.005
  3. Liu Y, Liao W, Jin G, Yang Q, Peng W. Additive manufacturing and digital design assisted precise apicoectomy: a case study. Rapid Prototyping J 2014;20:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2012-0056
  4. Yatzkair G, Cheng A, Brodie S, Raviv E, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in a human cadaver model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1143-1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12482
  5. D'Souza KM, Aras MA. Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review. J Oral Implantol 2012;38:643-652. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00018
  6. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol 2010;81:43-51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090348
  7. Byun C, Kim C, Cho S, Baek SH, Kim G, Kim SG, Kim SY. Endodontic treatment of an anomalous anterior tooth with the aid of a 3-dimensional printed physical tooth model. J Endod 2015;41:961-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.016
  8. Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G, Kuhl S. Guided endodontics: accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int Endod J 2016;49:966-972. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12544
  9. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod 2006;32:601-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010
  10. Wesson CM, Gale TM. Molar apicectomy with amalgam root-end filling: results of a prospective study in two district general hospitals. Br Dent J 2003;195:707-714. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810834
  11. Phillips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen: 2. Radiographic position in relation to the mandibular second premolar. J Endod 1992;18:271-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80953-2