Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Assessment of a Composite Modular System Considering Stiffness of Connections

접합부 강성을 고려한 합성 모듈러 시스템의 내진 성능평가

  • 최영후 (MCS 구조기술사 사무소) ;
  • 이호찬 (MCS 구조기술사 사무소) ;
  • 김진구 (성균관대학교 건축토목공학부)
  • Received : 2017.11.14
  • Accepted : 2018.04.26
  • Published : 2019.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Modular system can be divided into two types based on the methods of resisting load. The one is the open-sided modular system composed of beams and columns. The other is the enclosed modular system composed of panels and studs. Of the Modular systems, the use of open-sided modular system is limited because it consists of closed member sections. In order to solve this problem, Choi et al.(2017) proposed a composite modular system with folded steel members filled with concrete. However, it was assumed in the previous study that the connections between modules are composed of rigid joint. Therefore it didn't identify the effect of connection behavior in structure. This study used finite element analysis to calculate stiffness of the connections in the proposed modular system. The linearization method presented in FEMA 440 is used for seismic performance assessment of structures, considering the connection stiffness computed in this study. The result of analysis shows that the capacity and story drift ratio obtained in the model considering stiffness of connection are less than those in the model not considering connection stiffness. Based on this observation, it is concluded that the stiffness of connection has a considerable effect on structural behavior.

모듈러 시스템은 하중저항 방식에 따라 개방형 모듈러 및 폐쇄형 모듈러 분류가 된다. 그 중 개방형 모듈러는 폐쇄형 단면을 갖고 있어 부재간의 접합 및 모듈간의 접합을 하는데 제약이 있다. 이에 Choi et al.(2017)은 절골형 단면 안에 콘크리트를 채운 합성 모듈러 시스템을 제안하였다. 하지만 모듈간 접합을 강접으로 가정하여 접합부 거동에 의해 구조물 전체에 미치는 영향을 파악하지 못하였다. 본 연구에서는 유한요소해석을 하여 제안된 모듈러의 접합부 강성을 산정하였다. 성능 검증을 위해 FEMA 440의 선형화방법을 사용하여 접합부 강성 유, 무에 따른 구조물의 내진성능을 파악하였다. 해석결과에 따르면 접합부 강성을 고려한 모델의 보유 내력 및 층간변위비가 접합부 강성을 고려하지 않은 모델에 비해 현저하게 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 토대로 접합부의 강성이 전체 구조물 거동에 영향을 미치는 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park, Y.Y., Cho, B.H., Kim, K.H., Lee, C.K., Park, T.K. (2005), A Study on Evaluation of Optimal Construction Method of BTL Projects-Focused on Educational Facilities-, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10(3), 22-31.
  2. Lawson, R. M., Ogden, R. G., Berfin, R. (2012), Application for Modular Construction in High-Rise Buildings, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18, 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000057
  3. Hong, S. G. (2014), Structural Design Guidelines for Middle to High-rise Modular Buildings for Architects and Engineers, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 58(5), 15-19.
  4. Lee, S. S., park, K. S., Hong, S. Y., bae, K. W. (2015), Behavior of C-Shaped Beam to Square Hollow Section Column Connection in Modular Frame, Journal of Korea Society of Steel Construction, 27(5), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2015.27.5.471
  5. Choi, Y. H., Lee, H, C., Kim, J. K. (2017), Seismic Performance Assessment of a Modular System with Composite Section, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20(2), 69-77.
  6. KBC-2016 (2016), Korean Building Code and Commentary, Architectural Institute of Korea.
  7. Choi, K. S., Lee, H, C., Kim, H. J. (2015), Influence of Analytical Models on the Seismic Response of Modular Structures, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20(2), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.2.074
  8. Choi, K. S., Kim, H. J. (2015), An Analytical Sturdy on Rotational Capacity of Beam-Column Joint in Unit Modular Frames, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(2), 100-103.
  9. Lee, S. J., Kwak, E. S., Park, J. S., Kang, C. H., Shon, S. D (2017), Structural Performance of the Modular System with Fully Restrained Moment Connections using Ceiling Bracket, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 33(12), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2017.33.12.37
  10. Charney, F. A., Downs, W. M. (2004), Modeling Procedures for Panel Zone Deformation in Moment Resisting Frames, Proceedings of the 15 International Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures, Amsterdam, 121-130.
  11. FEMA-355D (2000), State of the Art Report on Connection Performance, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  12. AASHTO. (2012), AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., Washington, D.C. 713-718
  13. Computer and Structures, Inc. (2006), PERFORM Components and Elements for PERFORM 3D and PERFORM-Collapse ver.5, CSI, Berkeley, CA.
  14. ASCE (2007), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-06, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia
  15. Skalomenos, K. A., Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., Beskos, D. E. (2014), Modeling level selection for seismic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube/moment-resisting frames by using fragility Curve, EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, (44)2, 199-220
  16. FEMA-440 (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.