DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of glide path preparation with PathFile and ProGlider on the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne nickel-titanium files

  • Uslu, Gulsah (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Onsekiz Mart University) ;
  • Inan, Ugur (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University)
  • Received : 2019.01.24
  • Accepted : 2019.04.28
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of glide path preparation with PathFile and ProGlider nickel-titanium (NiTi) files on the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne NiTi files. Materials and Methods: Forty-four WaveOne Primary files were used and divided into four groups (n = 11). In the first group (0 WaveOne), the WaveOne Primary files served as a control group and were not used on acrylic blocks. In the 1 WaveOne Group, acrylic blocks were prepared using only WaveOne Primary files, and in the PF+WaveOne group and PG+WaveOne groups, acrylic blocks were first prepared with PathFile or ProGlider NiTi files, respectively, followed by the use of WaveOne Primary files. All the WaveOne Primary files were then subjected to cyclic fatigue testing. The number of cycles to failure was calculated and the data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey honest significant difference multiple-comparison test at a 5% significance level. Results: The highest number of cycles to failure was found in the control group, and the lowest numbers were found in the 1 WaveOne group and the PF+WaveOne group. Significant differences were found among the 1 WaveOne, PF+WaveOne, and control groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the PG+WaveOne group and the other three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Glide path preparation with NiTi rotary files did not affect the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Primary files used on acrylic blocks.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009;35:938-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.016
  2. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
  3. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:183-186. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137641.87125.8f
  4. Lopes HP, Moreira EJ, Elias CN, de Almeida RA, Neves MS. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 2007;33:55-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.003
  5. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J 2015;41:24-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12067
  6. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008;41:339-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01351.x
  7. Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:614-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02015.x
  8. Shen Y, Coil JM, Mo AJ, Wang Z, Hieawy A, Yang Y, Haapasalo M. WaveOne rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2016;42:186-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.008
  9. West JD. The endodontic Glidepath: “Secret to rotary safety”. Dent Today 2010;29:86-88.
  10. D'Amario M, Baldi M, Petricca R, De Angelis F, El Abed R, D'Arcangelo C. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals. J Endod 2013;39:1581-1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.037
  11. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Gergi R, Culla A, De Angelis F, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Osta N, Testarelli L. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012;38:1408-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.019
  12. Uslu G, Ozyurek T, Inan U. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider and one G glide path files. J Endod 2016;42:1555-1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.012
  13. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23:77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6
  14. Lopes HP, Britto IM, Elias CN, Machado de Oliveira JC, Neves MA, Moreira EJ, Siqueira JF Jr. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper universal instruments when subjected to static and dynamic tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:401-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.013
  15. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2006;32:55-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.013
  16. De-Deus G, Leal Vieira VT, Nogueira da Silva EJ, Lopes H, Elias CN, Moreira EJ. Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments. J Endod 2014;40:575-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.013
  17. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, Micallef JP. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29:567-575. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00007
  18. Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:215-219. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.215
  19. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.030
  20. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. J Endod 2014;40:2053-2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.001
  21. Berutti E, Alovisi M, Pastorelli MA, Chiandussi G, Scotti N, Pasqualini D. Energy consumption of ProTaper Next X1 after glide path with PathFiles and ProGlider. J Endod 2014;40:2015-2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.011
  22. Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, Paolino D, Scotti N, Bianchi CC, Pasqualini D. Micro-CT evaluation of several glide path techniques and ProTaper Next shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals. Int Endod J 2017;50:387-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12628
  23. Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. Endodontic canal preparation: innovations in glide path management and shaping canals. Dent Today 2014;33:118-123.
  24. Ozyurek T, Uslu G, Yilmaz K, Gundogar M. Effect of glide path creating on cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium files: a laboratory study. J Endod 2018;44:1033-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.004
  25. Turker SA, Saglam BC, Kocak MM, Kocak S. The effect of glide path on the surface quality of new and used rotary and reciprocating single files: OneShape versus WaveOne. Scanning 2014;36:608-613. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21161
  26. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod 2001;27:516-520. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200108000-00005
  27. Cheung GS, Oh SH, Ha JH, Kim SK, Park SH, Kim HC. Effect of torsional loading of nickel-titanium instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance. J Endod 2013;39:1593-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.032
  28. Cunha RS, Junaid A, Ensinas P, Nudera W, Bueno CE. Assessment of the separation incidence of reciprocating WaveOne files: a prospective clinical study. J Endod 2014;40:922-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.016
  29. Karova E, Topalova-Pirinska S. The influence of a glide path on the lifespan of WaveOne reciprocating files. Int J Dent Sci Res 2014;2:59-62. https://doi.org/10.12691/ijdsr-2-3-3