Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e22

Effect of glide path preparation with PathFile and ProGlider on the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne nickel-titanium files  

Uslu, Gulsah (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Onsekiz Mart University)
Inan, Ugur (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.44, no.2, 2019 , pp. 22.1-22.8 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of glide path preparation with PathFile and ProGlider nickel-titanium (NiTi) files on the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne NiTi files. Materials and Methods: Forty-four WaveOne Primary files were used and divided into four groups (n = 11). In the first group (0 WaveOne), the WaveOne Primary files served as a control group and were not used on acrylic blocks. In the 1 WaveOne Group, acrylic blocks were prepared using only WaveOne Primary files, and in the PF+WaveOne group and PG+WaveOne groups, acrylic blocks were first prepared with PathFile or ProGlider NiTi files, respectively, followed by the use of WaveOne Primary files. All the WaveOne Primary files were then subjected to cyclic fatigue testing. The number of cycles to failure was calculated and the data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey honest significant difference multiple-comparison test at a 5% significance level. Results: The highest number of cycles to failure was found in the control group, and the lowest numbers were found in the 1 WaveOne group and the PF+WaveOne group. Significant differences were found among the 1 WaveOne, PF+WaveOne, and control groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the PG+WaveOne group and the other three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Glide path preparation with NiTi rotary files did not affect the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Primary files used on acrylic blocks.
Keywords
Endodontics; Fracture strength; Glide path; PathFile; ProGlider; WaveOn;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Berutti E, Alovisi M, Pastorelli MA, Chiandussi G, Scotti N, Pasqualini D. Energy consumption of ProTaper Next X1 after glide path with PathFiles and ProGlider. J Endod 2014;40:2015-2018.   DOI
2 Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, Paolino D, Scotti N, Bianchi CC, Pasqualini D. Micro-CT evaluation of several glide path techniques and ProTaper Next shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals. Int Endod J 2017;50:387-397.   DOI
3 Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. Endodontic canal preparation: innovations in glide path management and shaping canals. Dent Today 2014;33:118-123.
4 Ozyurek T, Uslu G, Yilmaz K, Gundogar M. Effect of glide path creating on cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium files: a laboratory study. J Endod 2018;44:1033-1037.   DOI
5 Turker SA, Saglam BC, Kocak MM, Kocak S. The effect of glide path on the surface quality of new and used rotary and reciprocating single files: OneShape versus WaveOne. Scanning 2014;36:608-613.   DOI
6 Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod 2001;27:516-520.   DOI
7 Cheung GS, Oh SH, Ha JH, Kim SK, Park SH, Kim HC. Effect of torsional loading of nickel-titanium instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance. J Endod 2013;39:1593-1597.   DOI
8 Cunha RS, Junaid A, Ensinas P, Nudera W, Bueno CE. Assessment of the separation incidence of reciprocating WaveOne files: a prospective clinical study. J Endod 2014;40:922-924.   DOI
9 Karova E, Topalova-Pirinska S. The influence of a glide path on the lifespan of WaveOne reciprocating files. Int J Dent Sci Res 2014;2:59-62.   DOI
10 Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009;35:938-943.   DOI
11 Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165.   DOI
12 Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:183-186.   DOI
13 Lopes HP, Moreira EJ, Elias CN, de Almeida RA, Neves MS. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 2007;33:55-57.   DOI
14 Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J 2015;41:24-28.   DOI
15 Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008;41:339-344.   DOI
16 Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:614-618.   DOI
17 Shen Y, Coil JM, Mo AJ, Wang Z, Hieawy A, Yang Y, Haapasalo M. WaveOne rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2016;42:186-189.   DOI
18 West JD. The endodontic Glidepath: “Secret to rotary safety”. Dent Today 2010;29:86-88.
19 D'Amario M, Baldi M, Petricca R, De Angelis F, El Abed R, D'Arcangelo C. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals. J Endod 2013;39:1581-1584.   DOI
20 Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Gergi R, Culla A, De Angelis F, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Osta N, Testarelli L. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012;38:1408-1411.   DOI
21 Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2006;32:55-57.   DOI
22 Uslu G, Ozyurek T, Inan U. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider and one G glide path files. J Endod 2016;42:1555-1558.   DOI
23 Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23:77-85.   DOI
24 Lopes HP, Britto IM, Elias CN, Machado de Oliveira JC, Neves MA, Moreira EJ, Siqueira JF Jr. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper universal instruments when subjected to static and dynamic tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:401-404.   DOI
25 De-Deus G, Leal Vieira VT, Nogueira da Silva EJ, Lopes H, Elias CN, Moreira EJ. Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments. J Endod 2014;40:575-579.   DOI
26 Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, Micallef JP. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29:567-575.   DOI
27 Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:215-219.   DOI
28 Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-104.   DOI
29 Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. J Endod 2014;40:2053-2056.   DOI