A Study on the Innovation Resistance Caused by Blockchain to the Shipping and Port Industry

해운항만산업의 블록체인 도입에 따른 혁신저항에 관한 연구

  • 장명희 (한국해양대학교 해운경영학부) ;
  • 김윤미 (한국해양대학교 글로벌물류대학원 해운항만물류학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.23
  • Accepted : 2019.12.27
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

This study investigates the innovation resistance when blockchain technology is introduced for the shipping and port industry. For the development of a research model with suitable measures, we review and focus on innovation resistance factors with the blockchain technology derived from previous studies. In this research, we consider four factors (innovation characteristics, consumer characteristics, environmental characteristics, and cost characteristics) with innovation resistance as dependent variables. The innovation characteristics include relative benefits, complexity, and perceived risk. The consumer characteristics consider attitude toward existing products, innovation, and self-efficacy. Social impact variables are environmental characteristics and rationality of cost. In the statistical analysis, we set up eight hypotheses to test the significances between variables and find the following four empirical results. First, the relative advantage and the perceived risk have a significant effect on innovation characteristic, but the complexity of this characteristic has no significant effect on innovation resistance. Second, the rationality of cost has no significant effect on innovation resistance. Third, the attitude toward existing products has a positive effect and the innovation of the consumer characteristic has a negative effect on innovation resistance, while the self-efficacy has no significant effect. Finally, the social impact has a significant effect on innovation resistance to blockchain in the shipping and port industry.

본 연구의 목적은 해운항만산업에서 블록체인을 도입할 때 발생하는 혁신저항에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 대한 실증연구를 하는 것이다. 본 연구의 목적 달성을 위해 기존의 연구를 통하여 블록체인 도입에 대한 혁신저항에 영향을 미치는 요인을 도출하여 모형을 구축하였다. 모형의 유효성을 검증하기 위하여 국내의 해운항만산업에 종사하고 있는 종사자들을 대상으로 설문지를 이용하여 자료를 수집하고 통계분석을 통하여 모형을 검증하였다. 본 연구에서는 블록체인 도입에 따른 해운항만종사자들의 혁신저항에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 4가지 특성(혁신특성, 소비자 특성, 경제성, 사회적 영향)을 중심으로 변수들을 선택하였다. 혁신특성에 속하는 변수로는 상대적 이점, 복잡성, 인지된 위험이 포함되었고, 소비자 특성으로는 기존제품에 대한 태도, 혁신성, 자기효능감이 포함되었고, 경제성 변수로 비용의 합리성, 그리고 사회적 영향이 포함되었다. 이들 8가지 변수들이 혁신저항에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지에 대한 8개의 가설을 PLS 3.0 분석을 통하여 검정하였다. 가설검정 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 혁신특성 변수들 중에서 상대적 이점과 인지된 위험은 혁신저항에 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었지만, 복잡성은 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 둘째, 소비자 특성에 속하는 변수들 중에서 기존 제품에 대한 태도와 혁신성은 혁신저항에 유의한 값을 보였지만, 자기효능감은 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 셋째, 비용의 합리성은 혁신저항에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 사회적 영향은 혁신저항에 영향을 미치는 결과를 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강성연.홍아름.정성도(2019), 블록체인 기반의 특허거래 시스템 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구, 지식재산연구, 제14권 제2호, 125- 166. https://doi.org/10.34122/JIP.2019.14.2.125
  2. 고제욱.김종윤.김해웅.한경석(2019), 금융부문에서 블록체인의 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 혁신저항 효과의 실증연구, 한국디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 제20권 제4호, 783- 795.
  3. 김미희.김영민(2019), 블록체인DpoS 합의알고리즘을 활용한 IoT장치관리시스템개발, 전기전자학회논문지, 제23권 제2호, 508-516. https://doi.org/10.7471/IKEEE.2019.23.2.508
  4. 김일동(2018), 해운물류산업의 블록체인서비스 이용의도, 한국해양대학교 글로벌물류대학원 석사학위논문.
  5. 김재성.임성펄(2017), 국제 무역거래에서 블록체인의 활용가능성에 관한 연구, 무역상무연구, 제75권, 137-158.
  6. 마윤성.원도연.박상현(2015), 대학생들의 스포츠웨어러블 디바이스에 대한 혁신특성과 혁신저항의 관계에서 소비자 혁신성향의 조절효과 검증, 체육과학연구, 제26권 제4호, 861-873. https://doi.org/10.24985/KJSS.2015.26.4.861
  7. 박윤서.이승인(2007), 신상품에 대한 수용과 저항의 통합 모형, 경영학연구, 제36권 제7호, 1811-1841.
  8. 선화.김현덕(2019), 블록체인 기술이 물류산업에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, e-비즈니스연구, 제20권 제3호, 137-148.
  9. 손달호(2019), 핀테크 서비스에서 개인적 특성이 혁신저항 요인에 미치는영향, 정보시스템연구, 제28권 제3호, 123-139.
  10. 신영미.이승창.이호근.(2004), 무선 인터넷 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구, 시스템 특성, 사용자 인지, 그리고 사용, 경영학연구, 제33권 제5호, 1283-1310.
  11. 윤수경.김명지.최준호(2014), 혁신특성과 사용자 특성이 전자책 수용에 미치는 영향 : 혁신저항모형을 중심으로, 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제14권 제8호, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.061
  12. 이명구(2019), 블록체인 기반 관세행정 플랫폼 구축을 위한 개선방안 연구, e-비즈니스연구, 제20권 제3호, 107-121.
  13. 이은지.이지혜.조민하.성용준.최세정(2018), 혁신성과 자기조절초점이 사물인터넷 제품 사용에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지:소비자광고, 제19권 제1호, 67-91.
  14. 이재홍(2011), 항만물류서비스의 기술수용모델(TAM) 적용에 관한 실증적 연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제27집 제4호, 13-35.
  15. 이준필.장명희(2018), TOE와 혁신확산이론에 따른 해운항만조직의 빅데이터 사용의도에 관한 연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제34집 3호, 159-182.
  16. 이한신.김판수(2019), 소비자의 기술수용과 저항이 인공지능(AI) 사용의도에 미치는 영향, 경영학연구, 제48권 제5호, 1195-1219.
  17. 장대련, 조성도(2000), 기술제품 구매상황에서의 조직 내 혁신저항에 관한 연구: 전사적 자원관리를 중심으로, 마케팅연구, 제15권 제2호, 75-97.
  18. 장대련.조성도(1999), 기술제품의 조직 내 확산과 혁신저항, 한국마케팅저널, 제1권 제2호, 100-115.
  19. 정민혁.김상균(2019), 블록체인 기반 미디어사물인터넷 카메라 스트리밍 시스템, 한국방송미디어공학회 학술발표대회 논문집, 292-294.
  20. 정석찬.전화목(2019), 모바일 간편송금서비스 수용에 대한 저항요인 연구 : 전환비용과 혁신저항모형을 중심으로, 정보시스템연구, 제28권 제3호, 59-81.
  21. 조용현(2018), 물류기업의 혁신활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제34집 제3호, 75-92.
  22. 진석.안현철(2019), 웨어러블 헬스케어 기기의 수용에 관한 연구 : 확장된 통합기술수용모형과 혁신저항 모형의 통합적 접근, 정보시스템연구, 제28권 제3호, 159-202.
  23. 진천천.박현정(2018), 확장된 기술수용모델을 활용한 VR기기 수용관련 소비자 연구, 디지털융복합연구, 제16권 제6호, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.6.117
  24. Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y.(1988), On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  25. Bagozzi, R. and Lee, K. H.(2002), Multiple Routes for Social Influence: The Role of Compliance, Internalization, and Social Identity, Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 226-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090121
  26. Bandura, A.(1977), Self-Efficacy : Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  27. Bandura, A.(1995), Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
  28. Bandura, A., and Shunk, D.(1981), Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinic Interest through Promixal Self-Motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
  29. Barclay, D., Thompson, R. and Higgins, C. (1995), The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration, Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
  30. Bartunek, J. and Moch, M. K.(1987), First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404
  31. Bauer, R. A.(1960), Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking, Dynamic Marketing in a Changing World, 43, 389-398.
  32. Bass, F.(1969), A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables, Management Science, 15(5), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215
  33. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B. and Grewal, D. (1991), Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 307-326.
  34. Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. B.(1955), A study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51, 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
  35. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J.(1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
  36. Ellen, P. S., Bearden, W. O., and Sharma, S.(1990), Resistance to Technological Innovations : An Examination of The Role of Self-Efficacy and Performance Satisfaction, Journal of the Academy of the Marketing Science, 19(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726504
  37. Foxall, G. R.(1988), Marketing New Technology : Markets, Hierarchies, and User Initiated Innovation, Managerial and Decision Economics, 9(3), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090090309
  38. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I.(1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior : An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
  39. Fornell, C, D. and Larcker, F.(1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Errors, Marketing Res., 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  40. Garbarino, E. and Edell, J.(1997), Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1086/209500
  41. Gatignon, H., and Robertson, T. S.(1985), A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 849-867. https://doi.org/10.1086/209021
  42. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.(2005), A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 91-109.
  43. Goldsmith, R. E.(1984), Personality Characteristics Associated with Adaptation-Innovation, Journal of Psychology, 117(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1984.9923672
  44. Gourville, J. T.(2005), The Curse of Innovation : A Theory of Why Innovative New Products Fail in the Marketplace, HBS Marketing Research Paper, 05-06.
  45. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M.(2013), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling(PLS-SEM), Sage.
  46. Holak, S. L, Lehmann, D. R., and Sultan, F. (1985), The Role of Expectations in the Adoption of Innovative Consumer Durables: Some Preliminary Evidence, Journal of Retailing, 3(Fall), 243-259.
  47. Kleijnen, M., Lee, N. and Wetzels, M.(2009), An Exploration of Consumer Resistance to Innovation and its Antecedents, Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 344-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004
  48. Kirton, M.(1980), Adaptors and Innovators in Organizations, Human Relations, 33, 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678003300401
  49. Laukkanen, T.(2016), Consumer Adoption Versus Rejection Decisions in Seemingly Similar Service Innovations: The Case of the Internet and Mobile Banking, Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2432-2439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.013
  50. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R. and Sambamurthy, V.(2003), Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technology Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers, MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657-678. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036552
  51. Meuter, M. L., Mary, J. B., Amy, L. O. and Stephen, W. B.(2005), Choosing Alternative Service Delivery Models : An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies, Journal of Marketing, 69, 61-83.
  52. Midgley, D. F. and Dowling, G. R.(1978), Innovativeness : The Concept and its Measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1086/208701
  53. Miller, V., Johnson, J. and Grau, J.(1994), Antecedents to Willingness to Participate in a Planned Organizational Change, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889409365387
  54. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I.(1991), Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting and Information Technology, Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  55. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H.(1994), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  56. Ram, S. and Sheth, J. N.(1989), Consumer Resistance to Innovations: the Marketing Problem and Its Solutions, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542
  57. Ram, S.(1987), A Model of Innovation Resistance, Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 208-212.
  58. Rice, R. E., Grand, A. E. and Shmitz, T. J.(1990), Individual and Network Influences on the Adoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging, Social Networks, 12(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(90)90021-Z
  59. Robertson, T. S. and Gatignon, H.(1989), Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects, Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298905300104
  60. Rogers, E. M.(1983), Diffusion of Innovations, Third Edition, New York : The Free Press.
  61. Rogers, E. M.(1995), Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition, New York : The Free Press.
  62. Rogers, E. M.(2003), Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition, New York : The Free Press.
  63. Seth, J. N. and Ram, S.(1987), Bringing Innovation to Market : How to Break Corporate and Customer Barriers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  64. Saaksjarvi, M.(2003), Consumer Adoption of Technological Innovations, European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310475246
  65. Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L.(1991), Consumer Behavior, Prentice Hall Inc.
  66. Sheth, J. N.(1981), Psychology of Innovation Resistance: The Less Developed Concept in Diffusion Research, Research in Marketing, 4(3), 273-282.
  67. Tichy, N.(1983) The Essentials of Strategic Change Management. Journal of Business Strategy, 3, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb038990
  68. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito V., Chatelin, Y. and Lauro, C.(2005), PLS Path Modeling, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48, 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  69. Triandis, H. C.(1980) Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
  70. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D.(2000), A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  71. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D.(2003), User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  72. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. and Xu, X.(2012), Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157 -178, https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  73. Watson, G.(1971), Resistance to Change, American Behavioral Scientist, 14(5), 745-766. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427101400507
  74. Wallendorf, M. and Zaltman, G.(1983). Consumer Behavior: Basic Findings and Management Implications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  75. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L. and Joreskog, K. G. (1974), Intra Class Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400104
  76. Zikmund, W. and Scott, J.(1973), A Multivariate Analysis of Perceived Risk Self- Confidence and Information Sources, Advances in Consumer Research, 1, 406-416.
  77. World, S.(1997), In Leading Personalities in Statistical Sciences. From the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. (eds.) Wiley, New York.