Analysis of dependency structure between international freight rate index and crude oil price

국제운임지수와 원유가격의 의존관계 분석

  • Received : 2019.11.22
  • Accepted : 2019.12.27
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Crude oil is a resource that is being used as a raw material in major industries, representing the price of the raw material market. It is also an important element that affects the shipping market in terms of fuel costs for freight vessels. As a result, crude oil and freight rates are closely related. Therefore, from January 2009 to June 2019, this study analyzed the dependency structure between oil price (WTI) and freight rates (BDI, BCI, BPI, BSI, and BHI) using daily data. The main results are summarized as follows. First, according to the copula results, survival Gumbel copula in WTI-BDI, Clayton copula in WTI-BCI, Survival Joe copula in WTI-BPI, Joe copula in WTI-BSI, and survival Gumbel copula in WTI-BHI were selected as the best-fitted model. Second, looking at Kendall's tau correlation, there is a positive correlation between BDI and oil price. Furthermore, freight rate index (BCI, BPI, BSI) and oil price show positive dependencies. In particular, the strongest dependence was found in BCI and oil price returns. However, BHI and oil price show a negative dependency. Third, looking at the tail-dependency structure, a pair between oil price and BDI, BCI showed a lower tail-dependency. The pair between oil price and BSI showed the upper tail-dependency.

원유는 주요 산업에서 주원료로 활용되고 있는 자원으로 원자재 시장 가격 전반을 대변해주고, 해운시장에서는 선박 연료로 운임 산정에 영향을 미치는 중요한 요소이다. 이에 따라 원유와 국제 운임지수는 밀접한 관련이 존재한다. 따라서 본 연구는 2009년 1월부터 2019년 6월까지 현물유가(WTI)와 국제운임지수(BDI, BCI, BPI, BSI, BHI)의 일별 자료를 이용하여 유가와 국제운임지수의 의존관계를 분석하였다. 주요 분석결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, copula 추정결과를 보면, WTI-BDI에서는 survival Gumbel copula, WTI-BCI는 Clayton copula, WTI-BPI는 Survival Joe copula, WTI-BSI는 Joe copula, WTI-BHI는 survival Gumbel copula가 가장 적합한 copula 모형으로 선정되었다. 둘째, Kendall's tau를 살펴보면 다음과 같다. BDI와 유가 변화율 조합에서 양(+)의 상관관계가 나타났다. 또한 선형별 국제운임지수(BCI, BPI, BSI, BHI)와 유가 변화율의 조합에서는 BHI와 유가변화율 조합을 제외하고 모두 양(+)의 의존성을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, BCI와 유가변화율 조합에서 가장 강한 의존성이 나타났다. 셋째, 꼬리 의존성을 살펴보면 유가변화율과 BDI, BCI는 왼쪽 꼬리의존성이 나타나지만, 유가변화율과 BSI는 오른쪽 꼬리 의존성이 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김현석(2018). 원자재가격과 건화물선 운임지수의 비대칭 구조 분석. 한국항만경제학회지, 제34권 제4 호, 181-190.
  2. 김현석.장명희(2013). 벙커가격과 건화물선 지수 (Baltic Dry-bulk Index) 간의 비대칭 장기균형 분석. 한국항만경제학회지, 제29권 제2호, 63-79.
  3. 모수원(2005). 발틱 건화물운임지수의 변동성과 뉴스충격. 한국항만경제학회지, 제21권 제2호, 65-79.
  4. 정상국.김성기(2011). 국제유가의 변화가 건화물선 운임에 미치는 영향과 건화물선 운임간의 상관관계에 관한 연구. 한국항만경제학회지, 제27권 제2호, 217-240.
  5. 최기홍.김동윤(2018). 발틱 운임지수와 원유시장 간의 상호관련성. 한국항만경제학회지, 제34권 제4호, 125-139.
  6. Alexandridis, G.,S. Sahoo,, and I. Visvikis,(2017), Economic information transmissions and liquidity between shipping markets: New evidence from freight derivatives, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 98, 82-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.007
  7. Alizadeh, A., and N. Nomikos(2004). A Markov regime switching approach for hedging stock indices, Journal of Futures Markets: Futures, Options, and Other Derivative Products, 24(7), 649-674. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.10130
  8. Aloui, R., R. Gupta, and S. M. Miller(2016), Uncertainty and crude oil returns, Energy Economics, 55, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.01.012
  9. Brechmann, E., and U. Schepsmeier(2011). "Dependence modeling with C-and D-vine copulas: The R-package CDVine. Preprint (http://www-m4.ma.tum.de/Papers/index.html), 99, 106-164.
  10. Chen, F., Y, Miao, K. Tian, X. Ding, and T. Li (2017), Multifractal cross-correlations between crude oil and tanker freight rate, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 474, 344-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.01.069
  11. Notteboom, T. E., and B. Vernimmen(2009). The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping, Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.05.003
  12. Patton, A. J.(2009), Copula-based models for financial time series, In Handbook of financial time series (pp. 767-785). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  13. Poulakidas, A., and F. Joutz(2009). Exploring the link between oil prices and tanker rates, Maritime Policy & Management, 36(3), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830902861094
  14. Sariannidis, N., G. Galyfianakis, and E. Drimbetas (2015). The effect of financial and macroeconomic factors on the oil market, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(4), 1084-1091.
  15. Shi, W., Z. Yang, and K. X. Li, (2013), The impact of crude oil price on the tanker market, Maritime Policy & Management, 40(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.777981
  16. Sklar, M.(1959), Fonctions de repartition an dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. inst. statist. univ. Paris, 8, 229-231.
  17. Sukcharoen, K., T. Zohrabyan, D. Leatham, and X. Wu(2014), Interdependence of oil prices and stock market indices: A copula approach, Energy Economics, 44, 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.012
  18. Wang, S., Q. Meng, and Z. Liu(2013), Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 53, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.02.003
  19. Yin, J., M. Luo, and L. Fan(2017), Dynamics and interactions between spot and forward freights in the dry bulk shipping market, Maritime Policy & Management, 44(2), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1253884
  20. Zhang, Y. (2018). Investigating dependencies among oil price and tanker market variables by copula-based multivariate models, Energy, 161, 435-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.165