Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

[Retraction]Influencing Factors on Pre-implementation Acceptance of Geron-technology for the Elderly Residing in Community

[논문 철회]지역사회 노인의 제론테크놀로지에 대한 사용 전 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인

  • An, Jiwon (Department of Nursing Science, Far East University) ;
  • Park, Kyongok (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 안지원 (극동대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 박경옥 (강릉원주대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2019.04.28
  • Accepted : 2019.07.20
  • Published : 2019.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Geron-technology contributing to successful "Aging in place" increases the quality of life for the elderly and decreases the social caring cost. This study aims to identify influencing factors on pre-implementation acceptance of geron-technology for the elderly residing in a community. Data for 129 participants were analyzed. Results indicated that location, physical function, lack of technical support by family members, and the high financial cost as a 28% power were identified as the influencing factors on pre-implementation acceptance of geron-technology. Therefore, in the development of health and welfare strategy, these influencing factors should be considered in order to archive 'aging in place' for the elderly.

"Aging in place" 실현을 조력하는 제론테크놀로지는 노인의 삶의 질을 높이고 사회적 돌봄 비용을 감소시킬 수 있다. 본 연구는 지역사회 노인의 제론테크놀로지의 사용 전 수용성 및 장애요인을 파악하고 사용 전 수용성의 영향요인을 탐색하는 조사연구로 2019년 3월 16일부터 23일까지 노인복지관을 이용하는 남녀 노인 129명을 대상으로 설문 조사했다. 다중회귀분석을 한 결과 28%의 설명력으로 농촌지역의 대상자와 신체적인 기능이 높을수록, 고비용이나 기술사용에 대한 가족의 지원 부족과 같은 장애요인이 낮을수록 제론테크놀로지의 사용 전 수용성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 노인에 대한 보건복지 전략을 개발 할 때 이러한 요인에 대한 고려는 많은 수의 노인이 제론테크놀로지 사용을 촉진하여 향후 노인의 aging in place를 가능하게 할 것이다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2019_v17n7_157_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Model of pre-implementation acceptance

Table 1. Samples' Characteristics

DJTJBT_2019_v17n7_157_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. The Level of Pre-implementation Acceptance and Barrier of Geron-technology

DJTJBT_2019_v17n7_157_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Correlation between Subjects’ Characteristics and Pre-implementation Acceptance

DJTJBT_2019_v17n7_157_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Influence Factors on Pre-implementation Acceptance of Geron-technology

DJTJBT_2019_v17n7_157_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. J. L. Wiles, A. Leibing, N. Guberman, J. Reeve & R. E. Allen. (2012). The meaning of "aging in place" to older people. Gerontologist, 52(3), 357-366. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnr098
  2. A. M. Cook & J. M. Polgar. (2014). Assistive Technologies-E-Book: Principles and Practice. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-09631-7.00001-6
  3. J. K. Eckert, L. A. Morgan & N. Swamy. (2004). Preferences for receipt of care among community-dwelling adults. Journal of aging & social policy, 16(2), 49-65. DOI: 10.1300/j031v16n02_04
  4. S. T. Peek, E. J. Wouters, J. van Hoof, K. G. Luijkx, H. R. Boeije, & H. J. Vrijhoef. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
  5. G. Woolhead, M. Calnan, P. Dieppe & W. Tadd. (2004). Dignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think? Age and ageing, 33(2), 165-170. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh045
  6. S. Y. Kim, K. J. Moon & C. O. Oh. (2015). Searching for policy orientation by the analysis of factors affecting aging in place in the aging community. Journal of Regional Studies, 23(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.22921/JRS.2015.23.2.007
  7. Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues(NCWSI). (2010). Focus on Welfare Technology. https://nordicwelfare.org/en
  8. G. C. Yoo et al. (2014). A Study on the system building for successful application of welfare technology to welfare system (896827214X). Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  9. S. J. Czaja, N. Charness, A. D. Fisk & W. Rogers. (2002). Welcome to Gerontechnology 2002: Creative use of technology for better aging. Gerontechnology, 2(1), 1-2. DOI: 10.4017/gt.2002.02.01.001.00
  10. F. Cardinaux, D. Bhowmik, C. Abhayaratne & M. S. Hawley. (2011). Video Based Technology for Ambient Assisted Living: A review of the literature. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 3, 253-269. DOI: 10.3233/AIS-2011-0110
  11. S. Yusif, J. Soar & A. Hafeez-Baig. (2016). Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 94, 112-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004
  12. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi & P. R. Warshaw. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  13. Chen, K., & Chan, A. (2013). Use or non-use of gerontechnology - A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(10), 4645-4666. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10104645
  14. M. P. Zanna & J. K. Rempel. (1998). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D.Bar-Tal & A. W.Kruglanski(Eds.) The Social Psychology of Knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  15. E. Karahanna, D. W. Straub & N. L. Chervany. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS quarterly, 23(2), 183-213. DOI: 10.2307/249751
  16. B. Hofmann. (2013). Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 389-406. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9348-1
  17. D. E. Nease & J. M. Malouin. (2003). Depression screening: a practical strategy. Journal of Family Practice, 52(2), 118-126.
  18. R. C. Loureiro, W. S. Harwin, K. Nagai & M. Johnson. (2011). Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 49(10), 1103. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0797-0
  19. Hjalpmedelsinstitutet. (2012). Welfare technology for older people -Examples from Sweden. Swedich Institute of Assistive Technology(SIAT).
  20. R. A. Clark, S. C. Inglis, F. A. McAlister, J. G. F. Cleland & S. Stewart. (2007). Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 334(7600), 942. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39156.536968.55
  21. R. Gaikwad & J. Warren. (2009). The role of home-based information and communications technology interventions in chronic disease management: a systematic literature review. Health Informatics Journal, 15(2), 122-146. DOI: 10.1177/1460458209102973
  22. G. Pare, M. Jaana & C. Sicotte. (2007). Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14, 269-277. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m2270
  23. S. An, D. Park & K. Kim. (2017). The use of health and social services among rural older adults - focusing on older adults with functional disabilities. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  24. J. F. Calvert, J. Kaye, M. Leahy, K. Hexem & N. Carlson. (2009). Technology use by rural and urban oldest old. Technology and Health Care, 17(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2009-0527
  25. K. Renaud & J. Van Biljon. (2008. October). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. In the Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology. (pp.210-219). New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1456659.1456684
  26. N. Charness & W. R. Boot. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253-258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x
  27. C. K. Lai, J. C. Chung, N. K. Leung, J. C. Wong & D. P. Mak. (2010). A survey of older Hong Kong people's perceptions of telecommunication technologies and telecare devices. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 16(8), 441-446. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2010.090905
  28. N. L. Chappell & Z. Zimmer. (1999). Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and rehabilitation, 21(5-6), 222-230. DOI: 10.1080/096382899297648
  29. Y. H. Lee, E. J. Ji & O. Yun. (2019). Health concern, health information orientation, e-health literacy and health behavior in aged women : focused on 60-70s. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(4), 39-47. DOI: 10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.4.039
  30. Y. Raban & M. Brynin. (2006). Older people and new technologies. Computers, phones, and the Internet: Domesticating information technology, New York; Oxford University.
  31. S. J. Czaja et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and aging, 21(2), 333-352. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
  32. J. Cohen-Mansfield, M. A. Creedon, T. B. Malone, M. J. Kirkpatrick III, L. A. Dutra & R. P. Herman. (2005). Electronic memory aids for community-dwelling elderly persons: Attitudes, preferences, and potential utilization. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(1), 3-20. DOI: 10.1177/0733464804271277
  33. S. Park et al. (2017). Current Trends Analysis of Welfare Technology in Korea for Older Adults and People with Disabilities. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(10), 295-304. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.10.295
  34. C. Steggell, K. Hooker, S. Bowman, S. Choun & S. Kim. (2010). The role of technology for healthy aging among Korean and Hispanic women in the United States: a pilot study. Gerontechnology, 9(4), 433-449. DOI: 10.4017/gt.2010.09.04.007.00
  35. J. van Hoof, H. Kort, P. Rutten & M. Duijnstee. (2011). Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users. International journal of medical informatics, 80(5), 310-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.010
  36. G. Demiris, B. K. Hensel, M. Skubic & M. Rantz. (2008). Senior residents' perceived need of and preferences for "smart home" sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(1), 120-124. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462307080154
  37. H. Nho, Y. Kim & S. Hong. (2015). A Study on Technostress of Information Communication Technology User. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(4), 41-46. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.4.041
  38. E. J. Porter & L. H. Ganong. (2002). Considering the use of a personal emergency response system: an experience of frail, older women. Care Management Journals, 3(4), 192-198. DOI: 10.1891/cmaj.3.4.192.57452