한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제10권7호
  • /
  • Pages.343-354
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 통해 살펴본 PBL 부분통합 교과과정에 대한 간호학생의 인식

Nursing Students' Perception of PBL Hybrid Curriculum Examined Through Focus Group Interviews

  • 김수진 (제주한라대학교 간호학과)
  • Kim, Soo-Jin (Department of Nursing, Cheju Halla University)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.31
  • 심사 : 2019.07.20
  • 발행 : 2019.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 통해 PBL 부분통합 교과과정에 대한 간호학생의 인식을 파악하기 위한 질적연구이다. 연구대상자는 간호학과 4학년 학생이며, 총 25명을 4개의 그룹으로 나누어 인터뷰를 진행하였다. 자료는 의미있는 주제를 찾기 위해 내용분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구결과 6개의 주제가 도출되었다. 1) PBL 부분통합 교과과정의 비효율성 2) 학습에 대한 불안 3) PBL 운영에 대한 불만 4) 조별활동의 어려움 5) PBL에 대한 수용 6) 변화와 만족이 도출되었다. 본 연구결과를 바탕으로 다음을 제안한다. PBL에서 학습내용의 손실을 최소화 할 수 있는 방안과 과정평가 비중을 높여 PBL 평가의 본래 취지를 살려야 할 것이며 PBL 전문가와 전문부서에 의한 세분화된 튜터 교육프로그램이 개발, 운영되어야 할 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the perception of PBL hybrid curriculum of nursing students, using qualitative research conducted through focus group interviews. The data were collected from interviews with 25 nursing students of 4th grade after dividing into 4 groups. The analysis resulted in 6 major categories such as 1) inefficiency of PBL hybrid curriculum, 2) anxiety about learning, 3) dissatisfaction with PBL operation, 4) difficulty in group activity, 5) acceptance of PBL and 6) change and satisfaction. Based on the result, it is suggested that measures should be taken to minimize loss of learning contents in PBL, proportion of course evaluation should be increased to follow original intention of PBL evaluation, and detailed tutor education program should be developed and operated by PBL specialist and professional department.

키워드

Table 1. Analysis of perception of PBL hybrid curriculum of nursing student

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_343_t0001.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Y. J. Kim, P. S. Kang, C. K. Lee & J. H. Park. (2000). The principle and practice of PBL. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 12(1), 1-14.
  2. Y. S. Cho. (2006). Problem Based Learning. Seoul : Hakjisa.
  3. J. H. Kim et al. (2004). A qualitative evaluation of Problem-based learning curriculum by students; percertion. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 16(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2004.16.2.179
  4. Barrows, H. S. (2005). Problem-Based Learning 2nd Edition. Seoul : Sungkyunkwan University Press.
  5. I. A. Kang, J. H. Jung & D. Y. Jung. (2010). Problem-Based Learning. Seoul : Moonumsa publisher.
  6. H. Y. Lee. (2008). Teachers' perception of educational inclusion: A focus group study with elementary school teachers. Master thesis. Dankook University, Yongin-si.
  7. S. S. Lee. (2005). Teachers' Perception of Learning Desabilities : A Focus Group Study with General and Soecial Education Teachers. Master thesis. Dankook University, Yongin-si.
  8. R. A Krueger. & M. A. Casey. (2000). Focus group(3rd edition). California : Sage publications.
  9. E. G. Guba. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
  10. I. W. Chung, C. J. Shin, H. S. Hahn & Y. J. Song. (1999). The practice and evaluation of problem-based learning in college of medicine, chunbuk national university. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 11(2), 285-295.
  11. K. S. Baek. (2009). Perspectives of nursing students on problem-based learning.-learning experience in pediatric nursing-. Journal of Korean Academic Child Health Nursing, 15(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.4094/jkachn.2009.15.1.15
  12. Y. H. Noh et al. (2000). Three kinds of problem-based learning formules experienced in kyonkuk university college of medicine. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 12(2), 191-205.
  13. H. C. Eun., B. K. Kim & J. G. Kim. (1997). Comparative Study of Problem Based Learning(PBL) Experiences in Different Learning Groups. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 9(2), 119-128.
  14. K. Y. Lim. (1998). Implementation of Problem- based Learning to Established Medical Schools with Insufficient Resources. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 10(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.1998.10.1.21
  15. S. J. Kim. (2018). Tutors' Content Expertise and Experience on Student Satisfaction in Problem-Based Learning Nursing Curriculum. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(7), 552-559.
  16. S. J. Kim & H. K. Kang (2016). The Effect of Tutor's Expertise and Teaching Experience on Learners' Satisfaction in the Problem-Based Learning. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 6(7), 279-290.
  17. J. Y. Kim, H. .J . Son, J. H. Kim & K. P. Hong. (2005). Does Tutor Evaluation in the PBL Course Assess Different Aspects of Learning from What Written Examination Assesses?. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 17(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2005.17.1.37
  18. S. J. Kim & S. H. Kim. (2017). Correlation between tutor, peer, self-evaluation and paper test in problem based learning. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 18(7), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.7.275
  19. Y. H. So, Y. M. Lee & D. S. Ahn. (2005). An Student s Evaluation of the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning. Korean Jounal of Medical Education, 17(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2005.17.1.49