Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Structural Relations between Teacher-Student Interactions, Outcome Expectancy and Academic Engagement in Physical Education Classes

체육수업 상황에서 교사-학생 상호작용과 결과기대 및 학업열의의 구조적 관계

  • Kim, Seung-Yong (Major in Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Dong-A University) ;
  • Song, Ki-Hyun (Graduate School of Sports Industry, Kookmin University)
  • 김승용 (동아대학교 교육대학원 체육교육전공) ;
  • 송기현 (국민대학교 스포츠산업대학원)
  • Received : 2019.05.16
  • Accepted : 2019.07.20
  • Published : 2019.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to inquire into the structural relations between teacher-student interactions, outcome expectancy, academic engagement which are perceived in a physical education class. To this end, this study selected a total of 442 copies of questionnaires as final valid samples using the convenience sampling method targeting middle school students at 4 schools in metropolitan area. For data processing, this study confirmed the goodness of fit test of the whole model using SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 20.0, and then did hypothesis testing; the study results are as follows: First, proximity, one of subfactor of teacher-student interactions, had significant effects on outcome expectancy and academic engagement whereas influence had no significant effects on it. Second, students' outcome expectancy had significant impacts on their academic engagement. Third, outcome expectancy had mediating effects on relations between teacher-student interactions (proximity) and academic engagement.

본 연구의 목적은 체육수업 상황에서 교사-학생 상호작용과 결과기대 및 학업열의의 구조적 관계를 규명하는 것이다. 이 연구의 목적 달성을 위해 수도권에 소재하고 있는 중학교 4곳의 학생들을 대상으로 편의표본추출법을 이용하여 총 442부를 최종 유효 표본으로 선정하였다. 자료처리는 SPSS 20.0과 AMOS 20.0을 이용하여 전체연구 단위의 적합도 검증을 확인한 후 가설검정을 실시하였으며, 그에 따른 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 교사-학생 상호작용의 근접성은 결과기대와 학업열의에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 반면 영향력은 결과기대와 학업열의에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 체육수업에 대한 학생들의 결과기대는 학업열의에 정적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 교사-학생 상호작용의 근접성과 학업열의의 관계에서 결과기대는 매개역할을 하는 것으로 확인되었다.

Keywords

Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_303_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Model fit

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_303_t0002.png 이미지

Table 4. Structural model path

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_303_t0003.png 이미지

Table 3. Validity and reliability

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_303_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Mediating effect analysis through bootstrapping

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_303_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. S. Y. Kim & K. H. Song. (2017). A study on relations between teacher-student interactions, self-monitoring, asking help and self-handicapping in physical education class. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 56(6), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2017.11.56.6.15
  2. M. S. Jung & J. G. Park. (2011). Differences in teacher-student interaction by gender and its relationships with attitudes toward physical education. Korean Society of Sport Psychology, 22(4), 43-56.
  3. P. L. Witt, L. R. Wheeless & M. Allen. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/036452042000228054
  4. T. Wubbels, H. Creton, J. Levy & H. Hooymayers. (1993). The model for interpersonal behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 120-141). London: Falmer.
  5. M. S. Khine & D. L. Fisher. (2004). Teacher interaction in psycho social learning environments. Research in Science and Technological Education, 22, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514042000187566
  6. T. Z. Wubbels & M. Brekelmans. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003
  7. H. S. Cho. (2014). A study on structural relations between the teachers' attitudes toward students and students` subject interest and learning engagement in physical education classes. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 53(6), 207-219.
  8. K. H. Song & S. Y. Kim. (2016). Mediation effects of autonomous-controlled behavior regulation and subject interest on the relationship between caring climate perceived and task persistence in physical education Class. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 55(5), 193-207.
  9. S. Y. Kim, H. M. Lim & K. H. Song. (2019). A study on structural relations between teachers' attitudes toward students and academic engagement and task-solving behavior in physical education classes. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(3), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.3.249
  10. J. H. Biddle & N. Chatzisarantis. (1999). Motivation for a physically active lifestyle through physical education. In Y. Auweele, F. Bakker, S. Biddle, M. Durand & R. Seiler (Eds.), Psychology for Physical Educators (pp. 6-26). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  11. K. H. Song & S. Y. Kim. (2015). A study on structural relationships between, learning environment perceived in the PE class, outcome expectancy and task-solving behavior. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 54(5), 389-398.
  12. S. I. Kim. (2016). The relationship among the teaching behavior, expectancy-value and formation of relationship of secondly physical education classes. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 55(6), 207-216.
  13. J. S. Oh. (2018). Test of relation model between teachers' motivation styles and students' expected trust for prediction of their task-solving behavior in physical education. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 57(4), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2018.07.57.4.11
  14. S. J. Kim, Y. J. Kim & E. J. Cha. (2014). The differences analysis of personality and academic engagement according to the participating in school sports clubs. Korea Journal of Sports Science, 23(5), 327-340.
  15. J. Y. Lee & S. M. Lee. (2012). The development and validation of Korean Academic Engagement Inventory (KAEI). The Korean Association of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(1), 131-147.
  16. J. Y. Cho & M. S. Kim. (2013). Gender differences of academic burnout and academic engagement among Korean elementary school students. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 18(4), 477-497. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2013.18.4.001
  17. H. S. Cho. (2017). The effects of students' academic engagement for physical education classes on their academic effort and class participation attitude. Korea Journal of Sports Science, 26(4), 745-760. https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2017.08.26.4.745
  18. H. A. Lee & H. I. Jo. (2010). The relation among perfectionism, academic engagement and academic burnout: The mediating effects of motives and goal processes. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 25(3), 575-601.
  19. S. S. Lee. & H. S. Cho. (2015). The effects of teacher-student relationships and peer relationships on the academic engagement of students in physical education classes. The Korea Journal of Sports Science, 24(5), 1079-1090.
  20. H. S. Cho. (2019). The effects of teachers' autonomy support and peer relatedness support on the grit and academic engagement of students in PE classes. The Korea Journal of Sports Science, 28(1), 927-943. https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2019.02.28.1.927
  21. H. S. Cho. (2016). The effects of students' task value perception on their academic engagement and academic efforts during physical education classes. The Korea Journal of Sports Science, 25(6), 1033-1046.
  22. K. G. Lee, S. K. Lee & I. S. Nam. (2017). The effect of perceived learning environment on self-regulation strategies and academic engagement of middle school students in physical education class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(12), 709-728.
  23. Z. Gao. (2007). Understanding student's motivation in physical education: Integration of expectancy-value model and self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.
  24. J. G. Park & K. H. Lee. (2011). Middle school students' attitude toward physical education, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy in coeducational and same-sex classes. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 50(6), 183-195.
  25. S. G. West, J. F. Finch & P. J. Curran. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  26. J. F. Hair, B. Black, B. Babin, R. E. Anderson & R. L. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate date analysis, 6th ed., London: Prentice-Hall.
  27. S. H. Hong. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
  28. K. J. Preacher & A. F. Hayes. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  29. J. G. Park. (2012). The mediating roles of attitude toward physical education and achievement emotions in the relationships between teacher-student interactions, effort/ persistence, and competence. Korean Society of Sport Psychology, 23(2), 25-39.
  30. G. Marchand & E. A. Skinner. (2007). Motivational dynamics of children's academic help-seeking and concealment. Journal of Education Psychology, 99(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.65
  31. H. S. Cho. (2015). A relation between students' perception of expectance-value about physical education class and their academic engagement. Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education, 20(3), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.15831/JKSSPE.2015.20.3.181
  32. Z. Gao, P. Xiang, A. M. Lee & L. Harrison. (2008). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in beginning weight training class: Their relations to student's behavioral intention and actual behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599464