DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of reversing the coiling direction on the force-deflection characteristics of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs

  • Park, Hwan-Hyung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Suk-Hwan (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Hansung University) ;
  • Yoon, Juil (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Hansung University) ;
  • Jee, Kwang Koo (Future Convergence Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Han, Jun Hyun (Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Hak (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2018.10.02
  • Accepted : 2019.03.19
  • Published : 2019.07.25

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of reversing the coiling direction of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs (NiTi-CCSs) on the force-deflection characteristics. Methods: The samples consisted of two commercially available conventional NiTi-CCS groups and two reverse-wound NiTi-CCS groups (Ormco-Conventional vs. Ormco-Reverse; GAC-Conventional vs. GAC-Reverse; n = 20 per group). The reverse-wound NiTi-CCSs were directly made from the corresponding conventional NiTi-CCSs by reversing the coiling direction. Tensile tests were performed for each group in a temperature-controlled acrylic chamber ($37{\pm}1^{\circ}C$). After measuring the force level, the range of the deactivation force plateau (DFP) and the amount of mechanical hysteresis (MH), statistical analyses were performed. Results: The Ormco-Reverse group exhibited a significant shift of the DFP end point toward the origin point (2.3 to 0.6 mm), an increase in the force level (1.2 to 1.3 N) and amount of MH (1.0 to 1.5 N) compared to the Ormco-Conventional group (all p < 0.001), which indicated that force could be constantly maintained until the end of the deactivation curve. In contrast, the GAC-Reverse group exhibited a significant shift of the DFP-end point away from the origin point (0.2 to 3.3 mm), a decrease in the force level (1.1 to 0.9 N) and amount of MH (0.6 to 0.4 N) compared to the GAC-Conventional group (all p < 0.001), which may hinder the maintenance of force until the end of the deactivation curve. Conclusions: The two commercially available NiTi-CCS groups exhibited different patterns of change in the force-deflection characteristics when the coiling direction was reversed.

Keywords

References

  1. Wichelhaus A, Brauchli L, Ball J, Mertmann M. Mechanical behavior and clinical application of nickeltitanium closed-coil springs under different stress levels and mechanical loading cycles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:671-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.029
  2. Bezrouk A, Balsky L, Smutny M, Selke Krulichova I, Zahora J, Hanus J, et al. Thermomechanical properties of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs and their implications for clinical practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:319-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.025
  3. Burstone CJ, Qin B, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire--a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod 1985;87:445-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90083-1
  4. Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H. The superelastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90021-1
  5. Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Karibe M. The superelastic Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Part III. Studies on the Japanese NiTi alloy coil springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90356-3
  6. Maganzini AL, Wong AM, Ahmed MK. Forces of various nickel titanium closed coil springs. Angle Orthod 2010;80:182-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/011509-592.1
  7. Manhartsberger C, Seidenbusch W. Force delivery of Ni-Ti coil springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:8-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70158-0
  8. Ravipati RR, Sivakumar A, Sudhakar P, Padmapriya CV, Bhaskar M, Azharuddin M. An adjustment in NiTi closed coil spring for an extended range of activation. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2014;25:21-2.
  9. Vidoni G, Perinetti G, Antoniolli F, Castaldo A, Contardo L. Combined aging effects of strain and thermocycling on unload deflection modes of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs: an in-vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:451-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.022
  10. Alavi S, Haerian A. The effects of aging process and preactivation on mechanical properties of nickeltitanium closed coil springs. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12:231-4.
  11. Segner D, Ibe D. Properties of superelastic wires and their relevance to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:395-402. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/17.5.395
  12. Bartzela TN, Senn C, Wichelhaus A. Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium wires. Angle Orthod 2007;77:991-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/101206-423.1
  13. Jee KK, Kim YB, Han JH, inventor; Korea Institute of Science and Technology, assignee. Method to provide initial tension for coil spring and its application. United States Patent US 8,186,060. 2012 May 29.
  14. Jee KK, Han JH, Jang WY. Improvement of actuating properties of a SMA coil spring by change in coil orientation. Mater Sci Forum 2013;738-739:589-94. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.738-739.589
  15. Santoro M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: a clinically oriented review. Part I: temperature transitional ranges. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:587-93. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112446
  16. Vieira CI, Caldas SG, Martins LP, Martins RP. Superelasticity and force plateau of nickel-titanium springs: an in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:46-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.046-055.oar
  17. Martins RP, Buschang PH, Gandini LG Jr. Group A T-loop for differential moment mechanics: an implant study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:182-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.055
  18. von Fraunhofer JA, Bonds PW, Johnson BE. Force generation by orthodontic coil springs. Angle Orthod 1993;63:145-8.
  19. Tripolt H, Burstone CJ, Bantleon P, Manschiebel W. Force characteristics of nickel-titanium tension coil springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:498-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70271-4
  20. Vieira CIV, Reis JMDSN, Vaz LG, Martins LP, Martins RP. Deformation of nickel-titanium closed coil springs: an in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod 2017;22:38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.038-046.oar