DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SDN-based Hybrid Distributed Mobility Management

  • Wie, Sunghong (Department of Electricity and Electronic Engineering, The Cyber University of Korea)
  • Received : 2019.02.14
  • Accepted : 2019.05.03
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Distributed mobility management (DMM) does not use a centralized device. Its mobility functions are distributed among routers; therefore, the mobility services are not limited to the performance and reliability of specific mobility management equipment. The DMM scheme has been studied as a partially distributed architecture, which distributes only a packet delivery domain in combination with the software defined network (SDN) technology that separates the packet delivery and control areas. Particularly, a separated control area is advantageous in introducing a new service, thereby optimizing the network by recognizing the entire network situation and taking an optimal decision. The SDN-based mobility management scheme is studied as a method to optimize the packet delivery path whenever a mobile node moves; however, it results in excessive signaling processing cost. To reduce the high signaling cost, we propose a hybrid distributed mobility management method and analyze its performance mathematically.

Keywords

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Mobility management operation based PMIPv6.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. SDN architecture.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Initial registration procedure.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Handover procedure.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Signaling cost according to the total arrival rate.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Packet delivery cost according to the total arrival rate.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Signaling cost according to MN’s moving speed.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Signaling cost according to the session duration of group 1.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Signaling cost according to the session duration of group 2.

Table 1. Parameters used for performance analysis.

E1ICAW_2019_v17n2_97_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Fixed and Mobile Internet Traffic Forecast, 2017-2022, [Internet] Available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/index.html, 2018.
  2. J. Zuniga, C. J. Bernardos, A. Oliva, T. Melia, R. Costa, and A. Reznik, "Distributed mobility management: A standards landscape," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 80-87, 2013. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6476870.
  3. F. Giust, C. Bernardos, and A. Oliva, "Analytic evaluation and experimental validation of a network-based IPv6 distributed mobility management solution," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol 13, no. 11, pp. 2484-2497, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2014.2307304.
  4. S. Wie and J. Jang, "A study for performance evaluation of distributed mobility management based on proxy mobile IPv6," Journal of Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 97-105, 2015. DOI: 10.6109/JKIICE.2015.19.1.97.
  5. T. Nguyen and C. Bonnet, "A hybrid centralized/distributed mobility management for supporting highly mobile users," in Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 3939-3944, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2015.7248940.
  6. S. Wie and J. Jang, "Performance evaluation of hybrid distributed mobility management," Journal of Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1862-1872, 2017. DOI: 10.6109/JKIICE.2017.21.10.1862.
  7. Open Networking Foundation, "Software-defined networking: The new norm for networks," ONF White Paper, pp. 2-16, 2012.
  8. C. Bernardos, A. Oliva, P. Serrano, A. Banchs, L. Contreras, H Jin and J. Zuniga, "An architecture for software defined wireless networking," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 52-61, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/MWC.2014.6845049.
  9. S. Jeon, S. Figueiredo, R. Aguiar and H. Choo, "Distributed mobility management for the future mobile networks: A comprehensive analysis of key design options," IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 11423-11436, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713240.
  10. F. Giust, L. Cominardi and C. Bernardos, "Distributed mobility management for future 5G networks: Overview and analysis of existing approaches," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 142-149, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7010527.
  11. T. Condeixa and S. Sargento, "Context-aware adaptive IP mobility anchoring," Computer Networks, vol. 71, pp. 84-99, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/J.COMNET.2014.06.013.
  12. L. Cominardi, F. Giust, C. Bernardos and A. Oliva, "Distributed mobility management solutions for next mobile network architectures," Computer Networks, vol. 121, pp. 124-136, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/J.COMNET.2017.04.008.
  13. H. Yang and Y. Kim, "SDN-based distributed mobility management," in Proceeding of the Computer Networks International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pp. 13-15, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ICOIN.2016.7427127.
  14. T. Nguyen, C. Bonnet and J. Harri, "SDN-based distributed mobility management for 5G networks," in Proceeding of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1-7, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/WCNC.2016.7565106.
  15. A. Yegin, K. Kweon, J. Lee, and J. Park, "Corresponding network homing," the Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet Draft, draftyegin-dmm-cnet-homing-02, 2014.