Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of a Team Facilitation Program on Team Activities in Problem Based Learning

문제중심학습(PBL)에서 팀 활동을 촉진을 위한 퍼실리테이션 프로그램 적용에 대한 융합 연구

  • Received : 2019.04.18
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This quasi-experimental study was conducted to develop and implement a team facilitation program as well as to evaluate the effects of the program on Problem Based Learning (PBL) and how these influence on team dynamics. Data were collected in a convenient sample of 126 nursing students (intervention group=69; control group=57). Data were analyzed using ${\chi}^2$ test, T-test, and ANCOVA. SPSS23 was used. The intervention group received the PBL team facilitation program, whereas the control group received a human interaction training. The intervention group than the control group demonstrated significantly higher scores in a team dynamic among team members(F=10.35,p<0.01), trust among team members(F=9.86,p<0.01), communication(F=5.69,p<0.05), learning behavior of a team(F=4.57,p<0.05), and individual capability evaluation(F=5.12,p<0.05). Team performance was not significantly different between groups. This study reveals that the team facilitation program is an effective strategy to maximize the effects of PBL. We propose the need for educational strategy to support team function.

본 연구는 문제중심학습(PBL)의 수업 효과를 촉진하기 위한 전략으로 팀 퍼실리테이션 프로그램 적용 후 팀 활동 역량에 미치는 효과를 확인하기 위해 팀 역동성을 측정한 융합연구이다. 연구방법으로 실험군에게는 팀 퍼실리테이션 프로그램을, 대조군에게는 인간관계 프로그램을 적용한 후 효과를 분석하였다. 연구결과, 팀 퍼실리테이션 프로그램을 교육 받은 실험군이 인간관계 교육을 받은 대조군보다 팀 활동을 위한 개인기여 역량(F=5.12, p<0.05), 팀원들의 팀 역동성(F=10.35, p<0.01)에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였고, 팀 역동성 항목 중 팀원 간 신뢰(F=9.86, p<0.01), 의사소통(F=5.69, p<0.05), 팀 학습행동(F=4.57 p<0.05)이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 연구 결과, PBL 수업에서 팀 퍼실리테이션 프로그램이 팀 역동성을 촉진하였다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 향후 PBL과 같은 소그룹 협동 학습에서 팀 역동 활성화에 필요한 교육적 프로그램을 사전에 적용할 필요성이 있다.

Keywords

Table 1. Experimental and Control Major Experimental Treatments

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Homogeneity Test on General Characteristic of Participants

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Homogeneity Test on Dependent Variables

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Professors’ Evaluation on the Team Leaders

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Self-Evaluation of Team Leaders’ Responsibility

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Evaluation of Personal Contribution Capacity for Team Activities

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Evaluation of Team Dynamic of Team Members

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Evaluation of Sub-Domain for Team Dynamics

OHHGBW_2019_v10n6_299_t0008.png 이미지

References

  1. J. S. Won, N. C. Kim, & S. J, Choen. (2012). Nursing Process and Critical Thinking. Seoul : Hyunmmon Publishing Co.
  2. S. Y. Kim. (2017). Effect of Simulation-Based Education by Applying Problem Based Learning on Self-Directed Learning, Problem Solving Skills, Satisfaction of Learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(10), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.10.313
  3. M. J. Chae. (2016). Effect of Simulation-Based Education by Applying Problem Based Learning on Learning Attitude, Problem Solving Process, Clinical Performance Ability of Nursing Students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(4), 793-816.
  4. S. J. Kang, E. J. Kim & H. J. Shin. (2016). Convergence Study about Problem-Based Learning and Self-Directed Learning Ability, Problem Solving Skills, Academic Self-Efficacy, Motivation toward Learning of Nursing Students. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 7(2), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.2.033
  5. S. H. Lee. (2015). Analysis of the Structural Relationships among Fun, Learning Flow, Team Learning Activities and Learning Satisfaction in PBL Environment. Doctoral Dissertation. KunKuk University, Seoul.
  6. J. H. Hahn & S. I. Ko. (2009). The effect of Leadership on LMX, trust and team commitment in cooperative learning based on team management. The Journal of Vocational Educatopnal Research, 28(3), 111-132.
  7. J. L. Choi & K. W. Jang. (2016). Teaching with PBL(2e). Seoul : Hakjisa Corp.
  8. I. A. Kang. (1994). PBL and 'Reflective Journal' -'Team Leader Process for Samsung Electronics' Transformation-Flucent Leadership Development'. The Journal of Training and Development, 4, 3-27.
  9. I. A. Kang. (2002). Special Issue : PBL as an Adult Learning Method. Journal of Nursing Query, 15(1), 26-54.
  10. M. S. Chung. (2006). Understanding and Practice of Cooperative Learning. Seoul : Kyoyookbook.
  11. D. J. McAllister. (1995). Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
  12. H. J. Park. (2008). The Relationship of Team Learning Behavior and Team Transactive Memory to Team Performance : Team Factors and Leader Behavior Types as Antecedents. Doctoral Dissertation. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  13. S. Ariel. (2000). Team Dispersion : The effect of geographical dispersion on team process and performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  14. A. C. Edmondson. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  15. S. Wong. (2002). Investigating Collective Learning in Teams : The context in which it occurs and the collective knowledge that emerge from it. Doctoral Dissertation, Duke University, Durham.
  16. D. G. Ancona & D. F. Caldwell. (1992). Demography and Design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.321
  17. B. S. Yang. (2006). A Study on the Adapting Process of Nursing Students to Problem-based Learning. J. Korean Acad Nurs, 36(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.1.25
  18. K. W. Chang & J. H. Sung. (2012). Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Group Composition in Problem based Learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(4), 231-260.
  19. K. Y. Lim, H. O. Heo & Y. S. Kim. (2009). Team Leaders' Interaction Patterns in Online Team Project. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 15(4), 295-317.
  20. E. C. Hwang. (2008). Team Members 'Participation Attitudes According to Team Leaders' Types in Physical Education Classes Adapted for Cooperative Learning. Master's Dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  21. Y. B. Kim & J. S. Cha. (1994). Project Team Leader's Roles and Team Performance. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 19(1), 123-144.
  22. M. W. Kim & H. J. Lee. (2016). The Effects of Learning Outcome by Team Composition Method. The Journal of Korea Society for Wellness, 11(4), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2016.11.11.4.113
  23. J. Y. Kim & E. Y. Choi. (2009). Participation and Academic Achievement by Learning Styles in Problem Based Learning. J. Korean Acad Fundam Nurs, 16(2), 200-206.
  24. H. S. Chung. (2012). (Creating Group Synergies) Facilitation. Seoul: Sigma Press.
  25. N. R. Park. (2014). The effects of message facilitation types on interaction, learning presence, and learning satisfaction in online discussion. Master's Dissertation. Chung Ang University, Seoul.
  26. M. Shon & J. M. Ha. (2008). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Problem-Based Learning. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 225-251.