Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Employee's In-role Performance in Ppuri Company : Analysis of Moderating Effects between Foreigner and Native

뿌리기업 진정성리더십이 조직원 역할 내 성과에 미치는 영향 : 외국인과 내국인의 조절효과 분석

  • Shin, Seung-Han (College of Humanities & Social Sciences, Dongshin University) ;
  • Park, Young-Ju (Humanities & Social Sciences, Dongshin University)
  • 신승한 (동신대학교 인문사회과학대학) ;
  • 박영주 (동신대학교 인문사회과학대학)
  • Received : 2019.03.20
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The ppuri industry is growing in technical importance due to the 4th industrial revolution and is growing steadily. However, securing skilled workers is hardly realistic, and foreign workers are increasing. The purpose of this study is to find organizational commitment on for improvement of in-role performance of foreigners and Koreans working in ppuri companies and to find ways to support differentiation through comparison between groups. The subjects of this study were foreigners and Koreans in the ppuri company. Through the survey, 393 valid samples were collected. We use structural equation modeling to verify the research hypotheses, and conducted a survey on the employees of organization with information security policy. The results showed that in the case of foreigners, balanced processing affects in-role performance through organizational commitment. In the case of Koreans, relational transparency, balanced processing, and internalized moral perspectives affect in-role performance through organizational commitment. The results of the analysis suggest a strategic approach to improve the in-role performance of each group.

뿌리산업은 4차 산업혁명으로 인하여 기술적 중요성이 증가하고, 지속적으로 성장하고 있지만, 내국인 전문인력 확보가 현실적으로 어려워, 외국인 근로자가 증가하고 있다. 본 연구는 뿌리기업에서 근무하는 외국인과 내국인의 역할내 성과 향상을 위한 조직 몰입 방안을 제시하고, 집단간 비교를 통한 차별화 지원 방안을 찾고자 한다. 연구대상은 뿌리기업의 외국인과 내국인이며, 설문을 통하여 유효샘플 393개를 수집하였다. 연구가설 검증은 구조방정식 모델링을 실시하였다. 결과는 외국인의 경우 균형잡힌 정보처리가 조직몰입을 통해 역할 내 성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 내국인의 경우 관계적 투명성, 균형잡힌 정보처리과정, 내재화된 도덕적 관점이 조직몰입을 통해 역할 내 성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 분석 결과는 집단별 역할 내 성과 향상을 위한 전략적 접근 방향을 제시한다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model and Proposed Hypotheses

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Results of the Direct Effect

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Results of Moderating Effects

Table 1. Questionnaire

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Demographic Characteristics

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Result for Construct Validity and Reliability

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Result for Discriminant Validity

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Summary of Hypothesis Tests (Direct Effects)

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Result for Moderating Effect Modell

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_93_t0006.png 이미지

References

  1. KPIC (2018) Ppuri industry white paper.
  2. B. C. Park. (2013). On the policy for strengthening the global competitiveness of the fundamental manufacturing industry. Korean Association of Regional Studies, 21(4), 1-19.
  3. M. S. Yim. (2016). The convergence between manufacturing and ICT : The exploring strategies for manufacturing version 3.0 in Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.219
  4. KPIC. (2016). Ppuri industry actual situation survey.
  5. J. H. Kim & B. M. Kim. (2017). Factors influencing acculturative stress of migrant workers. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(8), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.8.277
  6. Y. M. Ha, K. S. Park & J. E. Cho. (2018). Factors influencing on problem drinking in foreign workers for drinking motives. acculturative stress. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(2), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.2.225
  7. G. T. Page, J. B. Thomas & A. R. Marshall.(1978). International dictionary of education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 26(3), 277-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1978.9973529
  8. J. D. Pincus. (1986). Communication satisfaction, job satisfaction, and job performance. Human Communication Research, 12 (3), 395-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00084.x
  9. R. P. Tett & J. P. Meyer. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
  10. W. C. Borman & S. M. Motowidlo. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations ; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
  11. K. Barksdale & J. M. Werner. (2001). Managerial ratings of in-role behaviors, organizational citizenship behaviors, and overall performance: testing different models of their relationship. Journal of Business Research, 51(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00061-2
  12. J. S. C. Hsu, S. P. Shih & Y. Li. (2017). The mediating effects of in-role and extra-role behaviors on the relationship between control and software-project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1524-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.008
  13. Y. H. Kim. (2013). The effect of authentic leadership on occupational self-efficacy and role-based performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(4), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.101
  14. L. J. Williams & S. E. Anderson. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  15. R. Mowday, L. Porter & R. Steers. (1982). Employee-organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
  16. N. J. Allen & J. P. Meyer. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252-276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043
  17. J. P. Meyer, D. J. Stanley, L. Herscovitch & L. Topolnytsky. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
  18. J. Brockner, G. Spreitzer, A. Mishra, W. Hochwarter, L. Pepper & J. Weinberg. (2004). Perceived control as an antidote to the negative effects of layoffs on survivors' organizational commitment and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 76-100.
  19. T. S. Ragu-Nathan, M. Tarafdar, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, & Q. Tu. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
  20. J. H. Chun, J. H. Lee & J. Y. Yoo. (2013). The effect of organizational culture types on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in small and medium hospitals. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(7), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.11.289
  21. R. J. Erickson. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18, 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1995.18.2.121
  22. L. J. Williams & S. E. Anderson. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  23. F. Luthans & B. J. Avolio. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 241-261). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
  24. J. B. Kim. (2015). A study on the influence of authentic leadership in the age of convergence on the organizational effectiveness : Revolved around effect of tuned from confidence of superior. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(12), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.12.125
  25. B. George. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. John Wiley & Sons.
  26. B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, F. O. Walumbwa, F. Luthans & D. R. May. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
  27. B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
  28. W. L. Gardner, B. J. Avolio, F. Luthans, D. R. May & F. O. Walumba. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
  29. F. O. Walumbwa, B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, T. S. Wernsing & S. J. Peterson. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
  30. L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim. (2011). The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1146-1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.008
  31. M. H. Kernis. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01
  32. R. Clapp-Smith, G. R. Vogelgesang & J. B. Avey. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808326596
  33. R. M. Ryan & E. L. Deci. (2003). On assimilating identities to the self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures.
  34. J. E. Henderson & W. K. Hoy. (1983). Leader authenticity: The development and test of an operational measure. Educational and Psychological Research, 3(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341830030106
  35. L. M. Giallonardo, C. A. Wong & C. L. Iwasiw. (2010). Authentic leadership of preceptors: Predictor of new graduate nurses' work engagement and job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 993-1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01126.x
  36. R. Ilies, F. P. Morgeson & J. D. Nahrgang. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002
  37. H. K. Lee. (2014). Effects of authentic leadership on organizational commitment for employees. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(5), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.181
  38. H. S. Lee & S. H. Lee. (2016). Research on prevention principle for permanent migration of migrant workers. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(5), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.5.117
  39. Y. Choi. (2014). Factors affecting job satisfaction of foreign talent working in Korean company, The Journal of Labor Studie, 28(10), 133-165.
  40. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  41. B. H. Wixom & H. J. Watson. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 25(1). 17-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250957
  42. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  43. H. H. Harman. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
  44. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee & N. P. Podsakoff. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  45. A. Bhattacherjee & C. Sanford. (2009). The intention-behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290802121230