Figure 1. Creation process of wildlife crossing by consultation stage of environmental impact assessment.
Figures 2. A cross-sectional view of overbridge by way of illustration.
Figures 3. A cross-sectional view of underpass by way of illustration.
Figures 4. A cross-sectional view of amphibians·reptiles underpass by way of illustration.
Table 1. Review by the planning procedure of wildlife crossing
Table 2. Review for wildlife crossing planning
Table 3. Review for wildlife crossing location and type
Table 4. Installation reviews of overbridge on soil cut-slopes area
Table 5. Installation reviews of underpass in soil fill-slopes area
Table 6. Installation reviews of amphibians·reptiles underpass in soil fill-slopes area
Table 7. Method and review by design contents of wildlife crossing
Table 8. Method and review by the construction procedure of wildlife crossing
Table 9. Method and review by post-monitoring procedure of wildlife crossing
Table 10. Method and review by the maintenance procedure of wildlife crossing
References
- Cho DG. 2017. Ecological Restoration Planning and Designing. NEXUS Environmental design centre, Seoul. [Korean Literature]
- Clewell AF, Aronson J. 2013. Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. Island Press.
- Galatowitsch SM. 2012. Ecological Restoration. Sunderland: Sinauer associates.
- Kim JK. 2015. Ecological status and improvement suggestion of an artificial wildlife corridor in Incheon. Masters dissertation, The graduate school of Inha university. [Korean Literature]
- Lee SJ. 2010. A study on the installation of ecological corridors. Korean Environmental Law Association 32(1): 399-431. (in Korean with English summary)
- MOLIT. 2010. A handbook of road design (Volume 8). [Korean Literature]
- MOLIT and MOE. 2015. Environmental Friendly Road Construction Guidelines. [Korean Literature]
- MOE. 2010. Guidelines for Design and Management of Wildlife Crossing Structures in Korea. [Korean Literature]
- MOE. 2013. Guidelines for the Environmental Impact Assessment on the Creation and Management of Alternative Habitats. [Korean Literature]
- MOE. 2017. A Study on the Guidelines for the Improvement of Biomability in Environmental Impact Assessment. [Korean Literature]
- NIE. 2015. Guidelines for the Design of Natural Environment Conservation Projects. [Korean Literature]
- NIE. 2017. The study on the Guidelines for Improvement of Biological Mobility. [Korean Literature]
- Park JH, Yoo HS, Park MY. 2009. A Study on Assessment Items Analysis for Eco-corridors Area: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Korean Society of Environment Impact Assessment. 18(5): 301-312. [Korean Literature]
- Park JJ, Woo DG, Oh DH, Park CH. 2012. Site Selection of Wildlife Passage for Leopard Cat in Urban Area using Space Syntax. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(1): 92-99. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.1.092
- Park SI, Lee GJ. 2014. A study on building methodology for identifying Road-kill hot spots on Highways and Its empirical application. Journal of Korea Planning Association 50(3): 319-333. [Korean Literature]
- Shim YJ, Jung GJ, Eo YJ, Ryu YJ, Park HJ, Chang MH, Lee TH, Kim JK, Park SG, Chang EH, Chu YS, Park YS. 2018. A Study on the Legal and Institutional Review for Improving Bio-Mobility in Environmental Impact Assessment. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 21(1): 145-155. [Korean Literature]
- Woo DG, Choi TY, Seo HS, Lee DH, Park YS, Park HB, Moon HG, Cha JG, Lee SM, Park HY, Seo BS, Jong JK, Park JJ, Lee SK, Park YJ, Cheon GS, Kim KA, Kim JM, Choi JC. 2015. A study on analysis of habitat fragmentation and improvement of wildlife passage effectiveness. National Institute of Ecology. [Korean Literature]