DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring and Discussing the Link between Integrated Leadership in the Public Sector and Follower Happiness: the Case of South Korea

  • Lee, Soochang (Department of Police Administration, Kyungwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Daechan (Byuckkang Liberal Arts School, Kyungwoon University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.20
  • 심사 : 2019.05.26
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30

초록

This study tests the applicability of concepts of integrated leadership-in-government and follower happiness in South Korea and then comes up with implication and limitations on the applicability based on the study of Mathias et al. (2018). The study adopts eight leaderships: accountability, rule-following, political loyalty, network governance, task-oriented, relations-oriented, change-oriented and diversity-oriented leadership that Mathias et al. (2018) employ from Fernandez et al. (2010) and Tummers and Knies (2016). We also select job satisfaction and self-perceived performance to measure follower happiness depending on Mathias et al. (2018). According to the analytical results, it shows that accountability leadership, network governance leadership, task-oriented leadership, relations-oriented leadership, and change-oriented leadership have positive influences on follower happiness measured. Based on the analytical results, this study suggests implication and limitation on the applicability of the link between integrated leadership and follower happiness in comparison to the results from Mathias et al. (2018).

키워드

Table 1. Description of survey sample (N=354)

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_42_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Scales for measuring integrated leadership

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_42_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Scales for measuring job satisfaction

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_42_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Scales for measuring self-perceived performance

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_42_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Regression results of integrated leadership-in-government on follower happiness

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_42_t0005.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. M. Mathias, S. Fargher, & M. Beynon, "Exploring the Link Between Integrated Leadership-in-Government and Follower Happiness: The Case of Dubai", International Review of Administrative Sciences, pp. 1-19, 2018.
  2. J. M., Bryson, B.C., Crosby and L. Bloomberg, "Creating Public Value in Practice: Advancing the Common Good in a Multi-sector, Shared-power, No-one-wholly-in-charge World", Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.
  3. M. Van Wart, "Leadership in Public Organizations: An Introduction, 2nd edn", Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 2012.
  4. S. Fernandez, Y. J., Cho and J. L., Perry, "Exploring the Link between Integrated Leadership and Public Sector Performance", The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 308-323, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.009
  5. L. Tummers and E. Knies, "Measuring Public Leadership: Developing Scales for Four Key Public Leadership Roles", Public Administration, Vol. 94, pp. 433-451, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12224
  6. Z. Van der Wal, G. De Graaf, & K. Lasthuizen, "What's Valued most? Similarities and Differences between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private sector", Public Administration, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 465-482, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
  7. M. Bovens, "Analysing and Assessing Accountability: a Conceptual Framework", European Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 447-468, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  8. L. DeHart-Davis, "Green Tape: A Theory of Effective Organizational Rules", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 361-384, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun004
  9. J. E. Lane, "Will Public Management Drive out Public Administration", Asian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 139-151, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.1994.10800290
  10. J. P. Olsen, "Maybe It is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, pp. 1-24, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027
  11. B. M. Bass and R. M. Stogdill, "Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications", New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990.
  12. G. Yukl, "Leadership in Organizations", Pearson Prentice Hall Seventh (Eds.), 2010.
  13. S. K. Horwitz & I. B. Horwitz, "The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-analytic Review of Team Demography", Journal of Management, Vol. 33, pp. 987-1015, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
  14. M. E. P. Seligman & M. Csikszentmihalyi, "Positive Psychology: An Introduction", American Psychologist, Vol. 55, No.1, pp. 5-14, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
  15. C. D. Fisher, "Happiness at work", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 12, pp. 384-412, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x
  16. T. Kunin, "The Construction of a New Type of Attitude Measure", Personnel Psychology, Vol. 8, pp. 65-77, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1955.tb01189.x
  17. J. A. Judge and R. Klinger, "Job satisfaction. In: Eid M and Larsen RJ (Eds.)", The Science of Subjective Well-Being New York: The Guildford Press, 2008.
  18. W. Vandenabeele, "The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Self-Reported Performance: More Robust Evidence of the PSM-performance Relationship", International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 75, pp. 11-34, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308099504
  19. A. S. Vallina, J. Alegre, & R. F. Guerrero, "Happiness at Work in Knowledge-Intensive Contexts: Opening the Research Agenda ", European Research on Management and Business Economics, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 149-159, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.05.003
  20. K. Chaiprasit and O. Santidhiraku, "Happiness at Work of Employees in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Thailand" , Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 189-200, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.540