지하시설물의 공공측량 성과심사 방법 개선에 관한 연구

Improvement on Surveying Performance Evaluation for Public Surveying of Underground Facilities

Abstract

1961년 공공측량 제도가 도입되었을 때는 사회기반시설 건설공사와 같은 대규모 측량성과가 주를 이루었지만, 환경변화에 따라 소규모 지하시설물 위주의 측량성과가 대부분을 차지하고 있다. 지하시설물의 측량방법은 관로 매설 후 되메우기 전 실측하는 방법과 되메우기 후 탐사를 이용하는 방법이 있으며, 각각의 장단점이 존재한다. 그러나 탐사를 통해 관로가 관측되지 않는 불탐구간의 발생으로 지하시설물의 위치정확도 확보가 어려워지자 2017년 성과심사 규정을 개정하여 '지하시설물도 작성시기' 항목을 추가하였고 실측을 중심으로 심사하게 된다. 그러나 현장에서는 이와 관련하여 탐사의 장점과 실측의 한계에 대한 의견이 지속적으로 제기되어 왔다. 이에 본 연구에서는 공공측량 제도의 배경과 목적을 고려하여 지하시설물 측량이 공공측량에서 차지하는 비중을 확인하고, 공공측량 시행자 및 수행자를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행, 분석하여 현장 의견을 종합한 개선안을 제시하였다.

When the public surveying system was introduced in 1961, large scale surveying performances, such as infrastructure construction work, were dominant. However, due to changes in the environment, most of the current surveying performances focused on small scale underground facilities. The method of surveying underground facilities is as follows: "method of measurement before refilling after burying the pipeline" and "method of using exploration after refilling." There are advantages and disadvantages to each method. It became difficult to obtain the accuracy of the location of the underground facilities due to the fact that there were sections of the pipeline that had not been observed through exploration. Therefore, the 2017 performance evaluation regulations were revised. The revision included the addition of the "Underground Facilities Creation Period," a system that allows for surveys to be evaluated based on actual measurements. However, in this particular field, concerns about the advantages of exploration and the purpose of this study was to investigate the background and purpose of the limitations of the survey have been continuously raised. The purpose of this study was to investigate the background and purpose of the public surveying system and to identify the proportion of underground facilities surveying in comparison to public surveying. This study conducted surveys on the implementers of public surveying and those who did the actual surveying. The researcher has summarized the improvements that incorporate the analysis results and the field comments in the revised performance evaluation regulations in 2017.

Figure 1. Public Survey Status Changes in 2000~2015

TABLE 1. Number of work plan and results assesment review

TABLE 2. Complaints and improvements on underground facilities and small survey

TABLE 3. Electricity service contract statement (left), In-house quantity per unit standard summary (right)

TABLE 4. City gas service contract statement (left), In-house quantity per unit standard summary (right)