DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Social Network Analysis on the Common Initiative for the Electronic Government Law: Focusing on the Ruling Party and Seniority Effect

  • Lee, Hun-Hee (Korea Institute for Policy and Management) ;
  • Han, Sang-Ik (The Presidential Commission on Policy Planning)
  • Received : 2019.03.28
  • Accepted : 2019.06.18
  • Published : 2019.06.28

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the political system related to the Electronic Government Law by analyzing the process of the common initiative of the law. To achieve the goal, this study applied the method of social analysis and sugessted the proper role of the assembly for realizing the electronic government and its control. The data were gathered from the bill information service of the national assembly. Netminer 4.0 was used for refining and analyzing data. The results are as follows. First, by analyzing three centrality(degree, betweenness, and eigenvector) of assembly member, the network effect of the powered party and reelected members were revealed as strong in the network. Second, through the component analysis, 5 sub-network has shown in total. The sub-networks showed two distinctive difference between two big parties. By the difference, members in two parties showed different characteristics in constituting communities and the effect of the powered party revealed as strong and clear. Based on the result, this study demonstrated the necessity of social solidarity rather than solipsism in committing common initiative. And a chronological research is need to anlayze $18^{th}$ and $19^{th}$ assembly to verify the effect of the powered party in prospect study.

Keywords

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n6_125_f0001.png 이미지

Fig.1. The Network of Assembly Members on Electronic Government Law

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n6_125_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. The Components of Assembly Members on Electronic Government Law

Table 1. Basic Facts of 20th National Assembly

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n6_125_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. List of Initiatives on Electronic Government Law(9 Cases)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n6_125_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Centralities of the Network on Electronic Government Law

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n6_125_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. K. S. Kim, "How to elect more qualified congressmen?". Journal of European Constitutional Law Association, Vol. 7, pp. 149-174. 2010.
  2. B. K. Lee, and Y, S, Youm, "Identifying the structure of co-signing networks among the 17th korean congressmen in the standing committee of health and welfare". Journal of Contemporary Society and Culture, Vol. 29, pp. 33-58. 2009.
  3. J. H. Fowler, "Legislative cosponsorship networks in the US house and senate". Social Network, Vol. 28, pp. 454-465. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.003
  4. D. J. Chang, "Policy networks in the 17th national assembly of korea: an analysis of cosponsorship and friendship ties". Journal of Korean Association of Party Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 157-187. 2011.
  5. K. S. Kim, and M. R. Jang, "Social network analysis on the joint submission of sports bill in the 17, 18th national assembly of korea and bill adoption". Koran Journal of Sociology of Sport, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 1-26. 2014.
  6. J. Woon, "Bill sponsorship in congress: the moderating effect of agenda positions on legislative proposals", The Journal of Politics, Vol. 70, pp. 201-216, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080140
  7. S. C. Hong, "An analysis of celebrity politicians' legislative effectiveness from 1979 to 2016", Journal of Korean Political Communication Association, Vol. 43, pp. 351-385, 2016.
  8. H. O. Jeong, J. B. Yoon, and Y. H. Park, "The effect of legislators' individual-level factors on legislative effectiveness". The Journal of Political Science and Communication, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 243-274. 2016. https://doi.org/10.15617/psc.2016.02.19.1.243
  9. H. C. Lee, "Member's bill proposal in the 17th national assembly of korea", Journal of Korean Association of Party Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 255-286, 2009.
  10. S. J. Ka, "A study on standing committees of the 18th national assembly: comparison between the first half and the second half", Journal of Korean Association of Party Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-30, 2012.
  11. H. Ebel, L. Mielsch, and S. Bornholdt, "Scale-free topology of e-mail networks", Physical Review, Vol. 4, pp. 1-42, 2005.
  12. M. Hindman, K. Tsioutsiouliklis, and J. A. Johnson, "Googlearchy: how a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics on the web", Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Vol. 4, pp. 1-42, 2005.
  13. T. Burkett and J. Skvoretz, "Political support networks among US senators: stability and change from 1973 to 1990", Unpublished manuscript, College of Charleston, 2001.
  14. J. H. Fowler, "Connecting the congress: a study of cosponsorship network", Political Analysis, Vol. 14, pp. 456-487, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl002
  15. D. Epstein, J. H. Fowler, and S. O'Halloran, "Co-sponsorship networks of minority supported legislation in the house", Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, 2007.
  16. M. A. Porter, P. J. Mucha, M. E. J. Newman, and C. M. Warmbrand, "A network analysis of committees in the US house of representatives", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 102, pp. 7057-7062, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500191102
  17. J. H. Gross and C. Shalizi, "Cosponsorship in the US senate: a multi-level approach th detecting the subtle influence of social relational factors on legislative behavior", Unpublished working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.
  18. Y. Zhang, A. J. Friend, A. L. Traud, and M. A. Porter, "Community structure in congressional cosponsorship network", Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 387, No. 7, pp. 1705-1712, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.11.004
  19. G. Koger, "Position taking and cosponsorship in the US house", Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 28, pp. 225-246, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298003X200872
  20. D. Kessler and K. Krehbiel, "Dynamics of cosponsor ship", The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 555-566, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082608
  21. T. Burkett, "Cosponsorship in the US senate: a network analysis of senate communication and leadership 1973-1990", University of South Carolina, 1997.
  22. A. L. Barabasi, "Linked: the new science of network", East-Asia Publishing Company, 2006.
  23. T. Kim, "A Study on Direction of the Electronic Government : with Focused on Freedom of Information", Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 20(10), pp. 113-119, 2015 https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2015.20.10.113
  24. J. S. Koon, "A Study on improvement of information education", Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.31-37, 2014 https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2014.19.2.031
  25. Seok-In Lee. "A Study on IT Governance Critical Success Factors in Korean Government Integrated Data Center",Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 45-53, 2013. https://doi.org/10.9708/JKSCI.2013.18.12.045
  26. S. P. Borgatti, A. Mehra, D. J. Brass, and G. Labianca, "Network Analysis in the Social Science", Science, Vol. 323, pp. 1-24. 2009.
  27. Y. H. Kim, "Social Network Analysis", Seoul: Pakyoung Sa. 2007.
  28. L. Freeman, "Centrality in social network: conceptual clarification", Social Networks, Vol. 1, pp. 215-239. 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  29. K. C. Min, and Y. M. Kim, "Network analysis of welfare politics in korea". Korean Social Security Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 23-51. 2012.
  30. D. W. Sohn, "Social Network Analysis", Seoul: Kyungmun Sa. 2010.