References
- Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95, 939-969.
- Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education, Science Education, 92, 473-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20278
- Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Cho, H. Y., Kim, H. K., Yoon, H., & Lee, K. Y. (2014). Theories of science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Giere, R., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning. Belmont, Calif(et al.): Thomson Wadsworth
- Giere, R. (2010). An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese, 172, 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9506-z
- Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16, 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-2865-z
- Hanson, N. R. (1965). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. CUP Archive.
- Hempel, C. G. (1961). Aspects of scientific explanation, New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Hur, M. (1984). Development of science inquiry evaluation list. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 4(2), 57-63.
- Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. W. (2006). Exploring the implications of peirce's abduction in science education by theoretical investigation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 26(6), 703-722.
- Kang, N. H., & Lee, E. K. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1119
- Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy(Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation(pp. 99-117; 288-291). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Kim, Y. M., Park, Y. B., Park, H. J., Shin, D., Jeong, J. S., & Song, S. (2014). World of Science Education. Seoul: Bookshill.
- Kim, Y. S., Kwon, Y. J., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H, Seo, H., Son, Y., Jeong, E. Y., Jeong, J. S., & Cha, H. (2012). Theory of life science education. Paju: Freeacademy.
- Kim, H. K., & Song, J. W. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
- Kim, H., & Park, E. J. (2008). Logic for critical thinking. Seoul: Acanet.
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn(Ed.), The Essential Tension(pp. 320-339). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Kwon, Y. J., Jeong, J. S., Park, Y. B., & Kang, M. J. (2003). A philosophical study on the generating process of declarative scientific knowledge-focused on inductive, abductive, and deductive process. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 23(3), 215-228.
- Kwon, Y. J., Nam, J. H., Lee, K. Y., Lee, H. N., & Choi, K. H. (2013). Science education. Seoul: Bookshill.
- Kwon, J., Kim, B. K., Kang, N. H., Choi, B., Kim, H. N., Paik, S. H., Yang, I. H, Kwon, Y. J., Cha, H., U, J. O., & Jeong, J. W. (2012). Theories of science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
- Lee, S. K., Choi, C. I., Lee, G., Shin, M. K., & Song, H. (2013). Exploring Scientific Reasoning in Elementary Science Classroom Discourses. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(1), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.181
- Losee, J. (2001). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science(4th ed.). England, UK: Oxford university Press.
- Magnani, L. (2009). Theoretical and manipulative abduction. In R. Dillmann, Y. Nakamura, S. Schaal, D. Vernon(Eds.), Abductive cognition (pp. 1-61). New York, NY: Springer.
- Magnani, L., Nercessian, N., & Thagard, P. (1999), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
- Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond process. Studeis in Science Education, 14, 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268708559938
- National Research Council(2012), A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts. and core ideas. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press.
- Park, J. W. (2000). Analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis -Focused on the definition and the characteristics of scientific hypothesis. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 20(4), 667-679.
- Park, J. W., Choi, K. H., & Kim, Y. M. (2001). Theory of physics education 1. Seoul: Bookshill.
- Park, B. H., Kim, H. K., & Lee, B. W. (2007). Analyses of the basic inquiry process in Korean 3-10 grade science textbooks: Focused on observation and measurement. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 27(5), 421-431.
- Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Oh, J. Y., Kim, S. S., & Kang, Y. H. (2008). A suggestion for a creative teaching-learning program for gifted science students using abductive inference strategies. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 28(8), 786-795.
- Oh, P. S., & Kim, C. J. (2005). A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(5), 610-623.
- Oh, P. S., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Criteria for evaluating scientific models used by pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 34(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0135
- Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction?. Science Education, 95, 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20438
- Popper, K. (1958). The logic of scientific discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
- Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
- Song, H. (2017). Logic training for leader. Seoul: Sapiens21.
- The Korean Society of Earth Science (2009). Earth science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
- Wilson, R. A., & Keil, F. (1998). The shadows and shallows of explanation. Minds and Machines, 8, 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008259020140
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259