1 |
Cho, H. Y., Kim, H. K., Yoon, H., & Lee, K. Y. (2014). Theories of science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
|
2 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
3 |
Giere, R., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning. Belmont, Calif(et al.): Thomson Wadsworth
|
4 |
Giere, R. (2010). An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese, 172, 269-281.
DOI
|
5 |
Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16, 141-166.
DOI
|
6 |
Hanson, N. R. (1965). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. CUP Archive.
|
7 |
Hempel, C. G. (1961). Aspects of scientific explanation, New York, NY: The Free Press.
|
8 |
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
|
9 |
Hur, M. (1984). Development of science inquiry evaluation list. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 4(2), 57-63.
|
10 |
Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. W. (2006). Exploring the implications of peirce's abduction in science education by theoretical investigation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 26(6), 703-722.
|
11 |
Kang, N. H., & Lee, E. K. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138.
DOI
|
12 |
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
13 |
Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy(Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation(pp. 99-117; 288-291). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
|
14 |
Kim, Y. M., Park, Y. B., Park, H. J., Shin, D., Jeong, J. S., & Song, S. (2014). World of Science Education. Seoul: Bookshill.
|
15 |
Kim, Y. S., Kwon, Y. J., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H, Seo, H., Son, Y., Jeong, E. Y., Jeong, J. S., & Cha, H. (2012). Theory of life science education. Paju: Freeacademy.
|
16 |
Kim, H. K., & Song, J. W. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
|
17 |
Kim, H., & Park, E. J. (2008). Logic for critical thinking. Seoul: Acanet.
|
18 |
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn(Ed.), The Essential Tension(pp. 320-339). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
19 |
Kwon, Y. J., Jeong, J. S., Park, Y. B., & Kang, M. J. (2003). A philosophical study on the generating process of declarative scientific knowledge-focused on inductive, abductive, and deductive process. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 23(3), 215-228.
|
20 |
Kwon, Y. J., Nam, J. H., Lee, K. Y., Lee, H. N., & Choi, K. H. (2013). Science education. Seoul: Bookshill.
|
21 |
Kwon, J., Kim, B. K., Kang, N. H., Choi, B., Kim, H. N., Paik, S. H., Yang, I. H, Kwon, Y. J., Cha, H., U, J. O., & Jeong, J. W. (2012). Theories of science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
|
22 |
Magnani, L. (2009). Theoretical and manipulative abduction. In R. Dillmann, Y. Nakamura, S. Schaal, D. Vernon(Eds.), Abductive cognition (pp. 1-61). New York, NY: Springer.
|
23 |
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
DOI
|
24 |
Lee, S. K., Choi, C. I., Lee, G., Shin, M. K., & Song, H. (2013). Exploring Scientific Reasoning in Elementary Science Classroom Discourses. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(1), 181-192.
DOI
|
25 |
Losee, J. (2001). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science(4th ed.). England, UK: Oxford university Press.
|
26 |
Magnani, L., Nercessian, N., & Thagard, P. (1999), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
|
27 |
Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond process. Studeis in Science Education, 14, 33-62.
DOI
|
28 |
National Research Council(2012), A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts. and core ideas. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press.
|
29 |
Park, J. W. (2000). Analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis -Focused on the definition and the characteristics of scientific hypothesis. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 20(4), 667-679.
|
30 |
Park, J. W., Choi, K. H., & Kim, Y. M. (2001). Theory of physics education 1. Seoul: Bookshill.
|
31 |
Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction?. Science Education, 95, 627-638.
DOI
|
32 |
Park, B. H., Kim, H. K., & Lee, B. W. (2007). Analyses of the basic inquiry process in Korean 3-10 grade science textbooks: Focused on observation and measurement. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 27(5), 421-431.
|
33 |
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
|
34 |
Oh, J. Y., Kim, S. S., & Kang, Y. H. (2008). A suggestion for a creative teaching-learning program for gifted science students using abductive inference strategies. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 28(8), 786-795.
|
35 |
Oh, P. S., & Kim, C. J. (2005). A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(5), 610-623.
|
36 |
Oh, P. S., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Criteria for evaluating scientific models used by pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 34(2), 135-146.
DOI
|
37 |
Popper, K. (1958). The logic of scientific discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
|
38 |
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
DOI
|
39 |
Song, H. (2017). Logic training for leader. Seoul: Sapiens21.
|
40 |
The Korean Society of Earth Science (2009). Earth science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
|
41 |
Wilson, R. A., & Keil, F. (1998). The shadows and shallows of explanation. Minds and Machines, 8, 137-159.
DOI
|
42 |
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941-967.
DOI
|
43 |
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
DOI
|
44 |
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95, 939-969.
|
45 |
Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education, Science Education, 92, 473-498.
DOI
|