Figure 1. Comparison of the ratio between sub-majors of integrated science and kinds of the high school science teacher qualification
Table 1. Basic information of participants
Table 2. Main contents of the questionnaire
Table 3. Results on units of integrated science and number of integrated science teacher per class
Table 4. Main consideration for deciding on who teach the integrated science
Table 5. One-way ANOVA results on the perception of class changes according to sub-majors of integrated science teachers
Table 6. One-way ANOVA results on the perception of class changes according to teaching career of integrated science teachers
Table 7. Chi-square test results on difficulties in teaching integrated science
Table 8. One-way ANOVA results on the content of the In-service teacher training program according to the number of integrated science teacher per class
Table 9. One-way ANOVA results on the method of the In-service teacher training program according to the number of integrated science teacher per class
참고문헌
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). General capabilities in the Australian curriculum. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/overview/general-capabilities-in-the-australian-curriculum.
- Kim, H., & Jeong, E. (2018). How to apply 2015 national science curriculum at the general high school. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 21(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2018.21.1.61
- Kim, J., Oh, W., Chung, J., & Kim, S. (2012). Comparison of physics and other science teachers' conception in the 2009 revision of the high-school 'science' curriculum. New Physics: Sae Mully, 62(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.104
- Kim, N., & Shim, K. (2015). Educational implications for pre-service science teacher training through the comparative analysis between "Integrated Science" based on the 2015 revised science curriculum and educational contents presented in the pre-service science teachers' textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.1039
- Kim, Y. (2000). The state of the art of common science teaching in high school. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 200-213.
- Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (1997). The real situation of teaching and improvement plan for common science subject in the 6th curriculum. Report of Science Education, 28(-), 207-218.
- Kwon, K., & Cha, H. (2007). High school science teacher's perceptions about the 10th grade science. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 23(4), 135-154.
- Law, W. (2014). Understanding China's curriculum reform for the 21st century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 332-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.883431
- Lee, G., & Hong, H. (2017). A comparison of Integrated Science and Converged Science of the 2015 revised national curriculum through core concepts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 981-992. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.6.981
- Lee, M. (2001). Characteristics and tasks of the 7th science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 22(3), 248-257.
- Lee, W., & Hur, C. (1998). A study on curriculum for secondary general science teacher education. The journal of Korean Teacher Education, 15(2), 79-106.
- Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute. (2017). Statistical Yearbook of Education. Chungbuk: KEDI.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). The National Science Curriculum. Seoul: MEST.
- Ministry of Education. (2014). Press Release about Major Issues of the 2015 Revised Integrated Education Curriculum. Sejong: MOE.
- Ministry of Education. (2015a). The National Guidelines for the Primary and Secondary Curriculum. Sejong: MOE.
- Ministry of Education. (2015b). The National Science Curriculum. Sejong: MOE.
- Ministry of Education. (2015c). Press Release about the 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Sejong: MOE.
- Ministry of Education. (2018). Press release about 2022 college entrance system and high school education innovation. Sejong: MOE.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Definition and Selection for Key Competencies: Executive Summary. http://deseco.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.parsys.43469.downloadList.2296.DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dskcexecutivesummary.en.pdf.
- Shin, Y., & Choi, B. (2012). A survey on the management status and science teachers' perception of science in high school based on 2009 curriculum revision. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(10), 1599-1612. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.10.1599
- Sim, J. (2014). The teachers' perception of the implementation of high-school integrated science developed by 2009 revised science curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 17(1), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2014.17.1.53
- Singapore Ministry of Education. (2013). Science syllabus primary 2014. https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-primary-2014.pdf.
- Song, J. (2015). A Study on the Policy of Teacher's training program for the integrated science. The Korean Society for The Study of Teacher Education (Proceeding), 2015(11), 109-122.
- Ye, L., Laih, H., & Cheng, L. (2018). Fill the classroom with life: deepening the reform of Chinese primary and secondary classroom teaching, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(3), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1359340
- Yoon, H., Yoon, W., & Woo, A. (2011). High school science teacher' perceptions of the 2009 revised science curriculum and the science textbook. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.3.757
- Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2016). The analysis of high school science teachers expectations and concerns on the integrated science and science inquiry experiment subjects in 2015 revised national curriculum. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(5), 515-546.
- Yun, C., Kim, M., Youn, S., & Park, M. (2007). The essential characteristics and dimensions of competence as human ability. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 233-260.
피인용 문헌
- 중등학교 과학교사들의 공통과학 교사자격증 유무에 따른 통합과학교육과 지속가능발전교육에 대한 인식 vol.12, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2019.12.3.224
- 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 통합과학과 과학탐구실험이 학생들의 과학에 대한 흥미, 과학적 태도, STS와 과학의 본성에 대한 견해에 미치는 영향 vol.39, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.6.791