Figure 1. Practice of Activities and Experiments(Low Cost Electronic Scale represented by Grey Color)
Table 1. Participants
Table 2. Design of Activity
Table 3. Students’ Observations of Experiment 1
참고문헌
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Barton, R. (2002). IT in practical work: assessing and increasing the value-added. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 271-280). New York: Routledge.
- Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. Foss, P., Patton, P., & Beitchman, P. (trans.), New York: Semiotext(e).
- Chinn, C. A., & Melhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109-2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
- Fritschen, L. J., & Gay, L. W. (2012). Environmental instrumentation. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Galison, P. (1996). Computer simulation and the trading zone. In P. Galison & D. Stump (Eds.). The disunity of science: Boundaries, context, and power (pp. 118-157). California: Stanford University Press.
- Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Gough, N. (2002) 'If this were played upon a stage...': school laboratory work as a theatre of representation. In J. Wellington (Ed.)., Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 156-172). New York: Routledge.
- Grandy, R. & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16(2), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-2865-z
- Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180702
- Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Jeon, S., Kwak, Y., Koh, H., Lee, Y., & Choi, S. (2017). The needs analysis on science literacy required for Koreans in the future society. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.441
- Jho, H., & Song, J. (2011). The observation type of primary students and the effect of their views of science on observation activity in anomalous situation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education. 30(4), 405-414. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2011.30.4.405
- Kang, N., & Lee, E., (2013). An analysis of inquiry activities in high school physics textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.132
- Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2007). The effects of authentic open inquiry on cognitive reasoning through an analysis of types of student-generated questions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 930-943.
- Kim, H., & Song, J. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
- Kim, K., Noh, J., Seo I., & Noh, T. (2008). The effects of explicit and reflective instruction about nature of science using episodes from the history of science in 'composition of material' unit of middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(1), 89-99.
- Kim, S. (2012). Effects of simulated instruction activities through a constructivist lens on preservice biology teachers' epistemological belief, science teaching efficacy belief and teaching motivation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1157-1168. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1157
- Kim, Y., & Moon, S. (2003). An analysis of inquiry activities of the high school common science textbook (materials part) by using 3-dimensional analysis framework. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 274-287.
- Kirschner, P. A. (1992). Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education. Science & Education, 1(3), 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430277
- Ku, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., Cho, S., & Park, H. (2018).OECD Programme for international student assessment: Establishing a foundation of PISA 2018 Field Trial. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Report of Research RRE 2016-2-1.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
- Lee, S., Lee, G., Choii, C., & Shin, M. (2012). Analyzing coordination of theory and evidence presented in pre-service elementary teachers’ science writing for inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.201
- McComas, W. F., (2002). The nature of science in education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
- Ministry of Education, Korea (2007). Science curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Science curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.
- Moss, D. M., Abrams, M. D., & Kull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists, too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(2), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022564507639
- National Research Council (2000). Clean coastal waters: Understanding and reducing the effects of nutrient pollution. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996). Probing teachers' views of the nature of science: How should we do it and where should we be looking. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe (pp. 283-295). London: The Falmer Press.
- OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: Author.
- Park, J., Lee, S., Shim, H., Lee, G., & Shin, M. (2018). Analyzing the characteristics of pre-service elementary school teachers' modeling and epistemic criteria with the blackbox simulation program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.3.305
- Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
- Roychoudhury, A., & Roth, W. M. (1996). Interactions in an open-inquiry physics laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180403
- Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. Schwab, & P. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 1-103). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Schwab, J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: meaning and significances. In G. W. Ford, & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 1-30). Chicago: Grand McNally.
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610-645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128
- Song, J. (2006). J. J. Schwab's life and his ideas of science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(7), 856-869.
- Wardle, J. (2002). Virtual science: a practical alternative? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 271-280). New York: Routledge.
- Wellington, J. (2002a). Epilogue. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 282-284). New York: Routledge.
- Wellington, J. (2002b). Practical work in science: time for a reappraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 271-280). New York: Routledge.
- Woolnough, B. E. (2002). Authentic science in schools, to develop personal knowledge. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 271-280). New York: Routledge.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yang, I., Cho, H., Jeong, J., Hur, M., & Kim, Y. (2006). Aims of laboratory activities in school science: A delphi study of expert community. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(2), 177-190.