Table 1. Teacher Perceptions on Free Semester Guideline
Table 2. Teacher Perceptions on Free Semester Assessment
Table 3. Teacher Perceptions on Free Semester Process-based Assessment
Table 4. Implementation of Teacher Assessment/Student Self·Peer Assessment
Table 5. Goals of Implementing Student Self Assessment
Table 6. Goals of Implementing Student Peer Assessment
Table 7. Implementation of Cognitive/Affective Assessment
Table 8. Goals of Implementing Affective Assessment
Table 9. Benefits of Affective Assessment
Table 10. Implementation of Performance Assessment and Paper-Pencil Assessment
Table 11. Assessment Methods Used for Free Semester
Table 12. Most Frequently Used Assessment Methods
Table 13. Amount of Providing Feedbacks
Table 14. Benefits of Providing Feedbacks
Table 15. Descriptive Reporting
Table 16. Benefits of Professional Learning Community for Free Semester Assessment
References
- Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000333904
- Chi, E., Won, H., Min, K., Son, W., Kim, T., Lee, S., & Kang, C. (2014). A study on evaluation methods for middle school free semester system. Korean Educational Development Institute. CR 2014-07.
- Choi, K., Choi, K., & Lee, H. (2009). Exploration of relations between middle school science teachers' perception of students' Learning styles and their teaching styles. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(2), 267-275.
- Ha, H. (2016). Comparison and analysis of free semesters and regular semesters by the government adoption of the free semester program. (Master's thesis). Ajou University.
- Jang, D. (2015). In free learning semester science of curriculum form and class methods analysis. (Master's thesis). Ewha Womans University.
- Jeong, H., & Lee, H. (2017). Development and application of scientific inquiry-based STEAM education program for free-learning semester in middle school. Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 334-350. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.334
- Kim, H., Kwack, D., & Sung, M. (2000). An investigation on science teachers' evaluation practices in the secondary schools. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 101-111.
- Kim, H., & Yun, H. (2015). Promoting teacher-based assessment: Korean english teachers' perceptions of assessment and its applications. Teacher Education Research, 54(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.54.2.201506.171
- Kim, K., & Kim, S. (2002). A study on the weight of assessment domains in science education focused on the teacher's view points. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(3), 540-549.
- Kim, S. (2007). A study on analysis and alternatives of performance assessment in high school science subject. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 53-73.
- Kim, S. (2014). Teacher's Cognitions and Implementation on Student Assessment. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(1), 141-161.
- Kim, S. (2017a). A study of the middle school students' creative personality characteristics and attitude toward science through the scientific inquiry program in the free-semester system: Using the creative thinking techniques. (Master's thesis). Dankook University.
- Kim, S. (2017b). Development of program integrating career education in the life science chapter for free learning semester. (Master's thesis). Korea University.
- Kim, S., & Jhun, Y. (2016). The effect of peer review to the improvement f gifted elementary science students' open inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(6), 969-978. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0969
- Kim, Y. (2007). Qualitative research. Seoul: Moonumsa.
- Kim, Y. (2012). Qualitative research. Paju: Academypress.
- Kim, Y., & Jeong, S. (2017). Qualitative research. Paju: Academypress.
- Kriek, J., & Stols, G. (2010). Teachers' beliefs and their intention to use interactive simulations in their classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 30(3), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n3a284
- Lee, H., Choi, K., & Nam, J. (2000). The effects of formative assessment with detailed feedback on students' science achievement, attitude, and interaction between teacher and students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 479-490.
- Lee, J. (2018). A study of the development and effect analysis of science-based STEM program for free-year in middle school. (Master's thesis). Dankook University.
- Lee, J., Kim, J., & Hong, S. (2016). Development of the questionnaire for impeding leisure sports activity of women with disability. Korean Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 24(3), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.17006/kjapa.2016.24.3.97
- Lee, J., & Shin, Y. (2014). An analysis of elementary school teachers' difficulties in the STEAM class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 588-596. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.588
- Lee, K., Rim, H., Park, I., Seo, M., & Kim, B. (2016). A study on development of the survey items for affective domain in mahtmatics of NAEA. Th Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(4), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2016.19.4.45
- Lee, S., Bak, D., & Nam, J. (2015). Impact of peer assessment activities on high school student's argumentation in argument-based inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0353
- Lee, Y., Kim, Y., Lee, H., Kim, Y., Cho, D., & Cho, J. (2005) Action Research. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Lim, J., Kim, M., Lee, J., & Hong, H. (2015). Analysis of education assessment characteristics on pilot schools of free learning semester. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 18(3), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2015.18.3.233
- Ministry of Education (2015). A schematic design for middle school free semester. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education & Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2017). How can we evaluate student performance focusing process? ORM 2017-19-2.
- Nam, J., Kim, J., & Hahn, I. (2002). The effects of self-assessment on the students' science concept understanding and science-related attitudes in the middle school. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 46(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2002.46.3.287
- Noh, T., Lee, J., Kang, S., & Kang, H. (2015). Secondary school science teachers' actual and preferred types of assessment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 725-733. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0725
- Paik, S., & Ryu, H. (2014). High school students' perceptions on descriptive assessment activity experiences by teacher or by peer. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 593-599. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0593
- Park, H. (2016). A survey on the conditions of middle school science evaluation. Teacher Education Research, 55(3), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.55.3.201609.389
- Park, H., & Namkung, J. (2016). Factors influencing the key competencies of middle school students in south korea. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 149-172.
- Sato, M., Coffey, J., & Moorthy, S. (2005). Two teachers making assessment for learning their own. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135996
- Seong, T., & Si, K. (2006). Research methodology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2016). A manual for operating Seoul fee semester. 2016-17.
- Shin, C., Hwang, E., Kim, E., Song, K., & Park, M. (2014). Settlement measures for middle school free-semester program in korea. Korean Educational Development Institute. RR 2014-17.
- Shin, H., Ahn, S., & Kim, Y. (2017). A policy analysis on the process-based evaluation -Focusing on middle school teachers in seoul-. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2017.20.2.135
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Tierney, R. D. (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13(3), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940601035387
- Won, E., & Jeon, Y. (2016). Development of survey to inquire continuity of english curriculum between elementary and middle school. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(8), 568-579. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.08.568
- Won, H. (2016). An exploration on formative evaluation methods for free semester system in middle school. Journal of Fishries and Marine Sciences Education, 28(1), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2016.28.1.289
- Yoo, H., & Shin, J. (2014). A foundation study developing assessment framework for korean teacher culture competency. The Korean Language & Culture Education Society Academic Conference, 2014(1), 51-60.
- Yoo, K., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods. Seoul: Parkyoungsa.
Cited by
- 과학적 논의 과정을 시각화한 과정중심평가에서의 과학적 개념 이해 발달 vol.39, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.637
- 교과 연계 진로 탐색을 위한 인공지능 기반 고교 선택교과 및 대학 학과 추천 시스템 vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3745/ktsde.2021.10.1.35