Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Subjective Study of the High School Students on the Business Management of College

경영계열에 대한 고등학생의 주관성 연구

  • Received : 2019.02.12
  • Accepted : 2019.05.20
  • Published : 2019.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study started from the question of what is the perception of high school students' college of management, 'business school', which is the demand of university education. Especially, for the analysis, the Q methodology was used to typify the recognition. 30 high school students classified 30 selected Q-statements into 9points standard. As a result of analysis, three types were defined. emphasized 'overall management', 'business', and 'money management'. So, we called "Type of Overall Business Interest". emphasized 'money management' 'Member Management'. So, we called "Type of Management Money and Member". And emphasized 'business', 'marketing' and 'sales'. So, we called "Type of Business Recognition". In addition, we found a hypothesis that high school students' perception of the business line would be different according to the characteristics of the respondents.

본 연구는 대학교육의 수요자인 고등학생들의 '경상대학', '경영계열'에 대한 인식이 어떠한가에 대한 의문에서 출발하였다. 연구를 위해 인간의 주관성연구에 적합한 Q방법론을 활용하였다. 연구대상은 경기도에 소재한 S고등학교 학생 30명을 편의표집 하였고, 경영과 관련한 30개 단어를 Q표본으로 활용하였다. 분석결과 3개의 유형으로 정의되었다. <유형 I>은 '경영전반', '장사', '돈관리' 등을 강조하고 있어 "경영전반관심형", <유형 II>는 '돈관리', '사람관리' 등을 강조하고 있어 "돈/사람관리형", <유형 III>은 '장사', '마케팅', '판매영업' 등의 경영 내지는 비즈니스 용어를 강조하고 있어 "비즈니스인식형"으로 명명하였다. 또한, 유형별 응답자의 분포에 대한 교차분석결과 표본수를 2배수로 한 경우에 유의미한 차이를 보임으로써, 대학입시 수요자인 고등학생들의 경영계열에 대한 인식은 응답자의 특성에 따라서 차이가 있을 것이라는 가설을 발견하였다. 이로써 가설발견적 접근방법으로써의 유용성을 제고하였다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Study Model

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Q-Sample Distribution Structure

Table 1. Q-Method & R-Method[9]

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. P-Sample’ General Characteristics

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Q-Sample

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Eigen Value and Variances

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Correlations between Factors

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Characteristics of Factors

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Each Q-Sample’ Z-score Distribution

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Descending Array of Z-scores and Factor I

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Descending Array of Z-scores and Factor II

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Descending Array of Z-scores and Factor III

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Distribution of the Respondent’s Characteristics by Type

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Distribution of the Respondent’s Interest by Type

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_249_t0012.png 이미지

References

  1. Ministry of Education. (2014). The Plan for Reforming the University's Structure.
  2. Korea SALIM Management & Economics Research Institute. (2014). The Case Study of the Financial Support Program Management for University.
  3. W. J. Shim & S. H. Park. (2018). A Study of High School Students' Course-taking According to Their College Majors. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 6(1), 221-245.
  4. Namu.Wiki. (2018). https://namu.wiki
  5. H. E. Kim. (2010). A Study no the Living Status and Consciousness of Freshmen on year 2009. Study on the Living of Student on Yong In University. 17, 113-165.
  6. H. L. Roh. (2012). Characteristics of Highschool Students about Choosing a University. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial. 13(7), 2964-2970. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.7.2964
  7. W. S. Cho. (2009). Correlation between Major Satisfaction and Academic Achievement in accordance with Major-Interest Correspondence of the University Students, Daejin University Master's Thesis.
  8. M. Y. Ko. (2012). Qualitative Research Methodology, Seoul : ChongMock Publishing.
  9. J. W. Creswell. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
  10. G. W. Sur. (2008). Meaning of Performing Qualitative Research, The Korea Educational Review, 46(3), 133-161
  11. S. W. Kim. (2007). An Exploratory Study on the Grounded Theory as an Accounting Methodology. Accounting Information Review, 25(3), 77-102.
  12. D. H. Lee & D. K. Lee. (2007). An Abductive Approach on the Perception of the Accounting of Nonprofit Organizations by Applying the Qualitative Methodology. Accounting Review, 12(1), 291-308.
  13. H. G. Kim. (1992). Understanding of Q-Methodology for Subjectivity Study. The Seoul Journal of Nursing, 6(1), 1-11. 1992.
  14. J. G. Oh. (1999). An Approach with a View to Improving the Curriculum of Business Administration Department. The Journal of Economics and Management, 12, 80-105.
  15. S. J. Kim. (2005). An Approach with a View to Improving the Curriculum of Accounting Education of Business Administration Department. The Journal of Global Management, 2(1), 1-26.
  16. Y. H. Cho & J. J. Jung & M. Moon. (2012). Does the Effects of Student-College Fit make Achievement Growth and Employment Possibility higher? Korea Management Association. 3, 243-259.
  17. K. S. Hong & D. I. Kim. (2016). Gender Differences in Perception of Employment and College Major Selection of High School Students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(2), 25-44.
  18. Wikipedia Dictionary : https://ko.wikipedia.org
  19. Ministry of Education(2008-2012). The Basic Plan for Project of Enforcing Educational Competency
  20. Ministry of Education(2010-2012). The Basic Plan for Supporting Advancement of College Education Project.
  21. Ministry of Education(2013), Instruction on Operating BK21 Plus Project Management.
  22. Sanders, Keith P. & William Stephenson. (1974). The Study of His Behavior, Mass Communication Review, 2, 9-16.
  23. Brown R. S. (1997). "Political Subjectivity", New Haven. Mass: Yale University Press.
  24. H. S. Kim & Y. M. Won. (2000). Q-Methodology. Kyoyookbook: Seoul.
  25. H. G. Kim. (2008). Q Methodology: Philosophy, Theories, Analysis, and Application. Communication Books: Seoul.
  26. S. Wattes, P. Stenne & P. G. Beak(2014). Doing Q Methodological Research : theory, method and interpretation. Communication Books: Seoul.
  27. W. Stephenson. (1978). Concourse theory of communication. Communication, 3(1), .21-40.
  28. Stephenson, W.(1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136, 297. Quoted in Brown, S. R: Political subjectivity: Applications of Q, methodology in political science (New Haven and London: Yale University Press 1980), 9-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/136297b0
  29. H. Y. Jung. (2015). The Study on Essential Competencies for University Students in consideration of University Specialization and Major: Focusing on Hotel and Tourism Management. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(10), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.10.19
  30. E. M. Choi, L. S. Kwon, Y. S. Park & Y. S. Jung. (2018). A Study for Convergence Curriculum of Creative Practical Use of the Direction of Characterization of Healthcare. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(6), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.6.283
  31. H. W. Yim. (2018). A Study on Development of SMEs Start-up Consulting Course by Convergence subject STEAM. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology. 8(6), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.6.381
  32. J. C. Shin & K. I. Kim. (2018). The necessity of Smart Factory's Standards and Certification System Based on Grounded theory. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology. 8(2), 203-208.