Fig. 1. A panels of MFR(Bridger & Ruiz, 2006)
Fig. 2. The detection probability function of resourceallocation of MFR
Fig. 3. Simulation algorithm for MFR resource allocation
Fig. 4. Greedy algorithm for MFR resource allocation
Fig. 5-A. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.1, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 5-B. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.3, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 5-C. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 5-D. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.7, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 5-E. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.9, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 6-A. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.1)
Fig. 6-B. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 6-C. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.5)
Fig. 6-D. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.7)
Fig. 6-E. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.9)
Fig. 7-A. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.1, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 7-B. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.3, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 7-C. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 7-D. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.7, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 7-E. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.9, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 8-A. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.1)
Fig. 8-B. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.3)
Fig. 8-C. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.5)
Fig. 8-D. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.7)
Fig. 8-E. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats(Pa=0.5, Pb=0.9)
Table 1. Parameters of MFR resource allocation
Table 2. A comparison of the result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats in case of probability function(1)
Table 3. The result of MFR resource allocation for different type of threats in case of probability function (2)
References
- Agency for Defense Development (2018), Ulsan Batch-III Multi Function Radar, www.jdep.plani. co.kr.
- Bridger, W. W., M. D. Ruiz (2006), Total ownership cost reduction case study: AEGIS radar phase shifters, Technical Report, Naval Postgraduate School.
- Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L. and Stein, C., (1990), Introduction to Algorithms, MIT Press.
- DAMIR, FY 2017 President's Budget (2016), Selected Acquisition Report : DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class Destroyer, Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval.
- Hanwhasystem, (2018) https://www.hanwhasystems.com/front/pr/newsView.do (Accessed Dec 30. 2018).
- Jeong, B.-M., D.-S. Jang, H.-L. Choi, J.-E. Roh, (2012), "Decision of track update-rate for efficient usage of resource on multi-functiton radar", In Proceedings of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Science, 307-311.
- Jeong, K.-W. (2014), 교전용 장거리 다기능 레이다 기술 동향 및 발전방향, 한국전자파학회지 전자파기술, 25(2), 21-29.
- Jeong, N.-H., S.-H. Lee, M.-S. Kang, C.-W. Gu, C.-H. Kim, K.-T. Kim (2018), Target Prioritization for Multi-Function Radar using Artificial Neural Network Based on Steepest Descent Method, The Journal of Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, 29(1), 68-76.
- Jeong, S.-J., D.-S. Jang, H.-L. Choi, J.-H. Yang (2014) "Task Scheduling and Multiple Operation Analysis of Multi-Function Radars", Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Science, 42(3), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2014.42.3.254
- Ko, J.-Y., S.-S. Park, H.-L. Choi, J.-M. Ahn, S.-W. Lee, D.-H. Lee, J.-S. Yoon (2017), Implementation of Airborne Multi-Function Radar Including Attitude Maneuvering, The Journal of Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, 28(3), 225-236.
- Kim, H.-J., J.-Y. Park, D.-H. Kim, S.-J. Kim (2013) "A Study of Fuzzy Inference System Based Task Prioritization for the Improvement of Tracking Performance in Multi-Function Radar", The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, 24(2), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.5515/KJKIEES.2013.24.2.198
- Lee, J., Y.-J. Lim, Y.-S. Kim, H. Cho, Y.-M. Park, H.-C. Kim, K. Park, S.-M. Chung (2018), "A Study on MOE for Analyzing Effectiveness of a Surface Warship Detection System", In Proceedings of the 2018 Fall Conference on the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 459-460.
- Lee, J.-H., S.-G. Lee, D.-S. Park, B.-L. Cho (2014) "Effective Beam Structure for Multi-Target Detection and Tracking in the Active Electrically Scanned Array Radar", The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, 25(10), 1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.5515/KJKIEES.2014.25.10.1069
- Naval Technology(2018), Holland Class Offshore Patrol Vessels, www.naval-technology.com.
- Park, J.-W., D.-S. Jang, H.-L. Choi, M.-J. Tahk, J.-E. Roh, S.-J. Kim (2013) "Integrated Simulator of Airborne Multi-function Radar Resource Manager and Environment Model", Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Science, 41(7), 577-587. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2013.41.7.577
- Wagner, D., H. Mylander, W. Charles (1999), Naval Operations Analysis, Naval Institute Press.