Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of non-genetically and genetically modified organism (maize-soybean) diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass weight, and meat quality of broiler chicken

  • Zhang, Song (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Ao, Xiang (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, In Ho (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2018.09.25
  • Accepted : 2018.12.06
  • Published : 2019.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to compare growth performance, nutrient digestibility and meat quality of broilers fed a genetically modified organism (GMO) diet or a non-GMO diet. Methods: A total of 840 broilers with an initial body weight of 43.03 g per chick were randomly allocated into 1 of the following 2 dietary treatments lasted for 32 days (15 broilers per pen with 28 replicates per treatment): i) Trt 1, GMO maize-soybean meal based diet; ii) Trt 2, non-GMO maize soybean meal based diet. Both diets were maize-soybean meal diets. The GMO qualitative analysis, proximate analysis and amino acid analysis of the feed ingredient samples were carried out. Diets were formulated based on a nutrient matrix derived from analysis results. Growth performance was measured on day 0, 7, 17, and 32. And all other response criteria were measured on day 32. Results: The analysis results showed that the total Lys, Met, Thr of non-GMO grains were lower than that of GMO grains, the protein content of GMO soybean meal was higher than that of non-GMO soybean meal. Feed intake and feed conversion rate (FCR) were greater (p<0.05) in broilers provided with non-GMO diet than that of the GMO group from d 17 to 32. A decrease in FCR was observed in birds fed the GMO diet through the entire experiment (p<0.05). No significant impacts on blood profile, meat quality and nutrient digestibility were found in response to dietary treatments throughout the experimental period (p>0.05). Conclusion: These results indicated that non-GMO diet showed a negative effect on growth performance but nutrient digestibility, blood profile, carcass weight and meat quality were not affected by non-GMO diets.

Keywords

References

  1. Hammond BG, Vicini JL, Hartnell GF, et al. The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance. J Nutr 1996;126:717-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/126.3.717
  2. FAO/WHO. Strategies for assessing the safety of foods processed by biotechnology. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1991.
  3. FAO/WHO. Biotechnology and food safety. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation. FAO, Food and nutrition. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1996. 61 p.
  4. FAO/WHO. Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2000.
  5. US EPA. Bt plant-pesticides risks and benefits assessments: Insect resistance management. SAP Report No. 2000-07a, 2001.
  6. US FDA. Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. Federal Register 1992. 57:22984-3005.
  7. Wagner W, Kronberg N, Gaskell G, et al. Nature in disorder: the troubled public of biotechnology. In: Gaskell G, Bauer M, editors. Biotechnology 1996-2000: the years of controversy. London UK: The National Museum of Science and Industry; 2001. pp. 80-95.
  8. Lassen J, Madsen KH, Sandoe, P. Ethics and genetic engineering - lessons to be learned from GM foods. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2002;24:263-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490100262
  9. Miles S, Frewer LJ. QPCR GMO food work package 6: Socioeconomic impact of GMO regulation and GMO detection. Report to the European Commission. Norwich, CT, USA: Institute of Food Research; 2001
  10. Brake J, Faust MA, Stein J. Evaluation of transgenic event bt11 hybrid corn in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2003;82:551-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.551
  11. Kan CA, Hartnell GF. Evaluation of broiler performance when fed insect-protected, control, or commercial varieties of dehull soybean meal. Poult Sci 2004;83:2029-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.12.2029
  12. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
  13. Nutrient requirement of poultry. NRC. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.
  14. SAS Institute. SAS user's guide: statistics. Version 7.0 ed. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 1998.
  15. Rayan AM, Abbott LC. Compositional analysis of genetically modified corn events (NK603, MON88017 $\times$MON810 and MON89034$\times$MON88017) compared to conventional corn. Food Chem 2015;176:99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.044
  16. Flachowsky G. Aulrich K. Nutritional assessment of feeds from genetically modified organism. J Anim Feed Sci 2001;10(Suppl 1): 181-94. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/70020/2001
  17. Aulrich K, Halle I, Flachowsky G. Effect of genetically modified Bt-hybrids mazie on digestibility in laying hens. HO.VDLUFA-Conference, Giessen, Germany; 1998. pp. 465-8.
  18. Aulrich K, Bohme H, Daenicke R, Halle I, Flachowsky G. Genetically modified feeds in animal nutrition 1st communication: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn in poultry, pig and ruminant nutrition. Arch Tierernahr 2001;54:183-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390109381977
  19. Bohme H, Aulrich K, Daenicke R, Flachowsky G. Genetically modified feeds in animal nutrition. 2nd communication: glufosinate tolerant sugar beets (roots and silage) and maize grains for ruminants and pigs. Arch Tierernahr 2001;54:197-207 https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390109381978
  20. Daenicke R, Aulrich K, Flachowsky G. GMOs-corn in the diet. Mais 1999;27:135-7.
  21. Daenicke R, Aulrich K, Flachowsky G. Impact of transgenic and isogenic hybrids maize and Rubenblatt on the digestibility and gene silage in mutton. VDLUFA Kongressband 2000, 112. VDLUFA-Kongress, 2000; 141 (Abstr.)
  22. Halle I, Aulrich K, Flachowsky G. Use of cesar corn kernels and genetically modified Bt hybrids in broilers. Proceedings of 5 Meeting, Pigs and Poultry Nutrition; Wittenberg, Germay; 1999. pp. 265-71.
  23. Swiatkiewicz S, Twardowska M, Markowski J, Mazur M, Sieradzki Z, Kwiatek K. Nutritional efficiency of genetically modified, insect resistant corn (MON810) and glyphosate tolerant soybean meal (Roundup Ready) for broilers. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2010;54:43-8.
  24. Brake J, Vlachos D. Evaluation of transgenic event 176 “Bt” corn in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 1998;77:648-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.5.648
  25. CVB. Veevoedertabel (feeding value of feed ingredients) Lelystad, The Netherlands: Central Veevoeder Bureau; 2007.
  26. Goliomytis M, Panopoulou E, Rodgdakis E. Growth curves for body weight and major component parts, feed consumption, and mortality of male broiler chickens raised to maturity. Poult Sci 2003;82:1061-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.7.1061
  27. Denbow DM, Grabau EA, Lacy GH, Kornegay ET, Russel DR, Umbeck PF. Soybeans transformed with a fungal phytase gene improve phosphorus availability for broilers. Poult Sci 1998; 77:878-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.6.878
  28. Bai J, Greene E, Li WF, Kidd MT, Dridil S. Branched-chain amino acids modulate the expression of hepatic fatty acid metabolismrelated genes in female broiler chickens. Mol Nutr Food Res 2015;59:1171-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201400918
  29. Whang KY, Kim SW, Donovan SM, Mckeith FK, Easter RA. Effects of protein deprivation on subsequent growth performance, gain of body components, and protein requirements in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2003;81:705-16. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.813705x
  30. Taylor ML, Hartnell G, Nemeth M. Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing corn grain with insectprotected (corn rootworm and european corn borer) and herbicide-tolerant (glyphosate) traits, control corn, or commercial reference corn-revisited. Poult Sci 2005;84:1893-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.12.1893

Cited by

  1. Slaughter yield, quality of meat from broiler chickens of different origin and age on diet with extruded or meal soybean vol.49, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1979559