Korean Journal of Child Education & Care (한국보육학회지)

The Korean Socity For Child Education And Care (한국보육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Validation of Pre-service Teacher Efficacy Scale for Preschool Teachers

예비유아교사 교사효능감 척도(PS-TES) 타당화

  • Lee, Chae Ho (Dept. of Child and Family Welfare, Ulsan University)
  • 이채호 (울산대학교 아동가정복지학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.30
  • Accepted : 2019.03.11
  • Published : 2019.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was a teacher efficacy scale for pre-service teacher and to examine the reliability and validity of the scale. Methods: Participants for this study were 428 pre-service teachers from G region. the data were analyzed using correlation, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: The pre-service teacher efficacy scale was consisted of 3 factors, 'efficacy for instructional strategies', 'efficacy for student engagement' and 'efficacy for classroom management' with 12 items. Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was ranged from .72 to .82. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that CMIN/DF = 1.59, RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .05, TLI = .96, CFI = .97. Conclusion/Implications: In conclusion, all these results show that the pre-service teacher efficacy scale is quite a reliability and validity.

본 연구의 목적은 Ohio State Teacher Efficacy Scale(OSTES)을 활용하여 예비유아교사 교사효능감 척도(PS-TES)를 타당화 하는데 있다. 이를 위한 본 연구는 G지역에 소재한 3년제 대학 유아교육과 3학년 재학생 428명을 대상으로 설문지를 실시하였다. 척도의 타당도와 신뢰도를 확인하기 위해 탐색적 요인분석과 신뢰도(Cronbach's ${\alpha}$)계수, 상관분석 및 확인적 요인분석(CFA)을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 연구문제를 중심으로 살펴보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 예비유아교사 교사효능감 척도(PS-TES)의 하위요인을 살펴보기 위해 탐색적 요인분석 결과 3개의 하위요인(교수전략 효능감, 학생참여 효능감, 교실관리 효능감)으로 나타났으며 총 문항은 12문항으로 이루어졌다. 예비유아교사 교사효능감 척도(PS-TES)의 하위요인 신뢰도는 '교수전략 효능감' .82, '학생참여 효능감' .72, '교실관리 효능감' .76으로 나타났으며 전체 신뢰도는 .87로 나타났다. 둘째, 예비유아교사 교사효능감 척도(PS-TES)의 타당도를 살펴보기 위해 확인적 요인분석(CFA)을 실시한 결과 모델 적합도는 CMIN/DF = 1.59, RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .05, NNFI = .96, CFI = .97로 나타나 예비 유아교사 교사효능감 척도(PS-TES)가 적합한 측정 도구임이 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부(2011). 창의적체험활동. 교육과학기술부고시, 제2011-361호.https://moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=333&lev=0&statusYN=C&s=moe&m=05&opType=N&boardSeq=46974에서 2018년 11월 25일 인출
  2. 김선영, 서소정(2010). 유아 교사효능감 척도 개발 연구. 아동학회지, 31(4), 91-110.
  3. 김선영, 이경옥(2005). 유아교사의 교사효능감 개념과 측정구조에 대한 분석. 유아교육연구, 25(3), 267-287.
  4. 김아영, 김미진(2004). 교사효능감 척도 타당화. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 37-58.
  5. 김연하, 김양은(2008). Bandura의 교사 자기 효능감 척도(Teacher Self-efficacy Scale)요인구조분석. 유아교육연구, 28(2), 169-191.
  6. 문수백(2009).구조방정식모델링의이해와 적용. 서울: 학지사.
  7. 신은수, 박현경(2006). 가장놀이에 대한 교사교육이 교사의 놀이교수 효능감 및 놀이 개입 실제와 유아의 가장 놀이 사회적 수준에 미치는 영향. 유아교육연구, 26(6), 287-310.
  8. 신혜영, 이은해(2005). 어린이집 교사의 직무 스트레스와 효능감이 교사 행동의 질에 미치는 영향. 아동학회지, 26(5), 105-121.
  9. 유효순(2007). 아동발달. 서울: 창지사.
  10. 장영숙, 최미숙, 황윤세(2004). 유아교육기관 교사의 교육 신념 및 교수 효능감과 총체적 언어 교수법과의 관계. 유아교육연구, 24(2), 23-43.
  11. 최현정, 안혜진(2018). 예비유아교사의 교사효능감 척도 타당화 연구. 유아교육.보육복지연구, 22(2), 85-108.
  12. 통계청(2018). 9월 인구동향(출생, 사망, 혼인, 이혼). 정책 뉴스 http://khttp://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/3/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=371812&pageNo=&rowNum=10&amSeq=&sTarget=&sTxt에서 2018년 11월 25일 인출
  13. 한석실, 임명희(2003). 유치원 교사의 교사효능감 확인 연구. 미래유아교육학회지, 10(1), 207-240.
  14. 홍세희(2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.
  15. Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), 86-95. doi:10.1177/088840649401700203
  16. Anderson, R. N., Greene, M. L., & Loewen, P. S. (1988). Relationships among teachers' and students' thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 148-165.
  17. Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools, (REPORT NO. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  18. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
  19. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  20. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  21. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  22. Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII. Factor affecting implementation and continuation (Rep. No. R-1589/7-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 140 432).
  23. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park. CA : Sage.
  24. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
  25. Guskey, T. R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021002245
  26. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643. doi:10.3102/00028312031003627
  27. Hall, B., Burley, W., Villeme, M., & Brockmeier, L. (1992). An attempt to explicate teacher efficacy beliefs among first year teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  28. Henson, R. K., Bennett, D. T., Sienty, S. F., & Chambers, S. M. (2000). The relationship between means-end task analysis and context specific and global efficacy in emergency certification teachers: Exploring a new model of self-efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  29. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  30. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.
  31. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  32. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.64
  33. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247
  34. Moore, W., & Esselman, M. (1992). Teacher efficacy, power, school climate and achievement: A desegregating district's experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  35. Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
  36. Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65. doi:10.2307/1495395
  37. Shaffer, D. R., & Kipp, K. (2014). Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage.
  38. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  39. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  40. Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers'sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.81
  41. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Davis, H. A. (2006). Teacher self-efficacy and its influence on the achievement of adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy of adolescents (pp.117-137).Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.