DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건조환경의 쾌적성과 미기후가 도시공간의 외부활동 지속에 미치는 영향 분석

The Impact of Comfort of built Environment and Microclimate on Outdoor Activities in Urban Space

  • Jeong, Yunnam (Dept. Architecture, Korea Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Gunwon (Division of Architecture, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hoseo Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.30
  • 심사 : 2019.05.16
  • 발행 : 2019.05.31

초록

본 연구는 물리환경 및 미기후, 쾌적성이 외부활동 지속에 미치는 영향 도출을 목적으로 한다. 본 연구에서는 외부활동 지속에 영향을 미치는 요소로 도시 내 물리환경, 물리환경에 대해 외부공간 활동자가 느끼는 쾌적성, 미기후, 미기후에 대해 외부공간 활동자가 느끼는 쾌적성 등을 중심으로 접근했다. 이에 대한 분석을 위해서 2017년 중 봄, 여름, 겨울과 같이 세 계절에 대해서 외부공간 활동자가 느끼는 다양한 쾌적도에 대한 설문조사를 수행하였다. 설문조사 응답자가 설문조사에 응답하고 있는 동안에 주변 장소의 미기후에 대한 측정을 실시하였다. 이렇게 구축된 자료를 이용하여 효과적인 분석수행을 위해서 로짓회귀분석을 이용하였다. 분석결과, 물리환경 쾌적성의 용이성 및 안전성과 기후환경 쾌적성의 온도, 바람, 일사량 쾌적성 등은 외부공간의 활동 지속도와 유의미한 관계를 맺고 있었다. 머물기 및 대화 행위 보다는 걷기와 쇼핑 행위가 물리적 환경 및 기후환경에 보다 예민하게 영향을 받는 요소임을 도출했다.

This study aimed to examine the influence of physical environment, microclimate, and comfort on sustaining outdoor activities. This study has identified the main factors that influence sustaining outdoor activities as physical environment, comfort in the physical environment, microclimate and microclimate comfort. For analysis, the study conducted the investigation on pedestrian walkability during spring, summer and winter of the year 2017. The microclimate levels were also recorded at the same time. The method of logit regression analysis was used to analyze these outcomes. The result showed that the comfort and safety of the physical environment as well as the ideal climatic conditions, in terms of temperature, wind level, and solar insolation, were related to sustaining outdoor activities. Also, walking and shopping in the physical and climatic environment were the factors that were found to be more influenced than the act of remaining in a place and forming conversations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E. and Speck, J., Suburban Nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American Dream, North Point Press, New York. (2000)
  2. Hillier, B., Space is the Machine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (1996)
  3. Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities: The failure of modern town planning, Peregrinr Books, London. (1961, 1984 edition)
  4. Kang, D.H., Choi, C.H., and Jung, S.G, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, (2014), Vol.17, No.2, pp.136-155 https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2014.17.2.136
  5. Kim, D.W., Kim, J.K., and Jung, E.H., Urban Design, (2009), Vol.10, No.4, pp.203-212
  6. Kim, H. and Macdonald, E., International Journal of Sustanable Development & World Ecology, (2016), pp.1-10
  7. Llewelyn Davies, Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships/Housing Corporation, London. (2000)
  8. Masayoshi Oka, Transactions in GIS. (2011), Vol.15, No.1, pp.109-123 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01245.x
  9. Moudon, A.V., Public Streets for Public Use, Columbia University Press, New York. (1987)
  10. Newman, O., Journal of the American Planning Association, (1995), Vol.61, pp.149-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975629
  11. Oh, K.S., Lee, M.B., and Lee, D.W., Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, (2013), Vol.21, No.2, pp.55-71
  12. Pitts, A., Technologies and Techniques, presentation given at Education for the Next Millennium: Environmental Workshop, University of Sheffield, Sheffield. (1999)
  13. Whyte, W.H., The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Conservation Foundation, Washington DC. (1980)