Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Empirical Study on the Effect of Organic Structure and Learning Culture on Dynamic Competence and Corporate Performance

기업조직의 유기성과 학습문화가 동적역량과 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구

  • Jung, Doo-Sig (Dept. of Advanced industry Fusion. Changwon National University)
  • 정두식 (창원대학교 신산업융합학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.14
  • Accepted : 2019.02.20
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyze whether the organizational learning culture affects the firm's dynamic capacity and whether the dynamic capacity mediates the relationship between organizational learning culture and management performance. Respectively. First, "The more organizational structure is organic, the higher the integrated relocation capacity and learning capacity. Organizations with organic organizational structures were found to have the ability to successfully adapt to external changes because there is a practice that is not tied to formal processing or procedures. Second, it can be seen that there is a positive (+) influence on the relocation capacity among the dynamic competence of the learning culture of the corporate organization. Third, both sub-factors of dynamic competence have positive (+) influence on business performance. Also, there was no mediating effect of dynamic competence related to learning culture.

본 연구는 기업조직의 학습문화가 동적역량에 어떻게 영향을 미치며 동적역량이 기업의 학습문화와 기업성과 간의 관계에서 매개효과가 있는지 분석하고, 그 연구결과를 기업실무에 적용할 수 있는지 검증해보고자 하였다. 첫째, 기업조직의 구조가 유기적일수록 재배치역량과 학습역량이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 유기적인 기업조직을 가진 집단은 공식적인 처리방식이나 프로세스에 집착하지 않는 관행이 있기 때문에 외부변화에 능동적으로 대응할 수 있는 능력이 존재함을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 기업조직의 학습문화는 동적역량 중에서 재배치역량에 유의한 정(+)의 영향이 있음을 확인할 수 있었는데 개인수준과 집단수준의 학습문화가 구축되어 있는 기업조직일수록 특히 집단수준의 학습문화가 구축되어 있는 조직일수록 재배치역량이 높아짐을 볼 수 있었다. 셋째, 동적역량의 두 가지 하위요소는 모두 기업성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 동적역량이 기업성과에 미치는 직접적인 효과는 확인하였으나 학습문화와 관련된 동적역량의 매개효과는 없는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Resaerch Model

Table 1. Feasibility and Reliability Analysis Results

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Analysis between Corporate organizational structure Organic and financial performance

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Analysis between Corporate organizational structure Organic and non-financial performance

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Analysis between Corporate organizational structure Organic and Relocation capability

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Analysis between Corporate organizationalstructure Organic and Absorption capacity

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Analysis between Corporate organization Learning culture and Relocation capability

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Analysis between Corporate organization Learning culture and Absorption capacity

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8 Analysis between Relocation capability and financial performance

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Analysis between Absorption capacity and non-financial performance

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Mediating Effect Analysis of Relocation capability

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Mediating Effect Analysis of Absorption capacity

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_47_t0011.png 이미지

References

  1. M. Hammer. (2001), The superefficient company. Harvard business review, 79(8), 82-93.
  2. A. Jashapara. (1993). The competitive learning organization: a quest for the Holy Grail. Management Decision, 31(8.).
  3. X. Wang, B. Yang & G. N. McLean. (2007). Influence of demographic factors and ownership type upon organizational learning culture in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(3), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2007.00278.x
  4. K. M. Elsenhardt & J. A. Martin. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(1), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  5. D. J. Teece. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovatio, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00895-5
  6. J. Barney. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  7. E. Danneels. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic management journal, 23(12), 1095-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275
  8. M. Zollo & S. G. Winter. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
  9. W. Donaldson, T. M. Mackenzie & C. F. Underhill. (1996). A comparison of recollective memory and source monitoring. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(4), 486-490. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214551
  10. T. E. Burns & G. M. Stalker. (1961). The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  11. D. P. Slevin & J. G. Covin. (1997). Strategy formation patterns, performance, and the significance of context. Journal of Management, 23(2), 189-209.. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300205
  12. J. M. Stopford & C. W. Baden-Fuller. (1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic management journal, 15(7), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150703
  13. C. R. Schwenk & C. B. Shrader. (1993). Effects of formal strategic planning on financial performance in small firms: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 53-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879301700304
  14. J. Dewey. (1993). How we think: A restatement of the reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath.
  15. C. S. Argyris & DA. Schon. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
  16. A. D. Garvin. (1993). Building a learning-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2<109::AID-SMJ796>3.0.CO;2-P
  17. M. Pedler, J. Burgoyne & T. Boydell. (1991). The learning organisation, a strategy for sustainable development.
  18. M. J. Marquardt & A. Reynolds. (1994). The global learning organization. McGraw-Hill.
  19. M. Dodgson. (1993). Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization studies, 14(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303
  20. P. F. Drucker. (1993). Managing in turbulent times. Routledge.
  21. B. Yang, K. E. Watkins & V. J. Marsick. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1086
  22. P. Senge. (1990). The fifth discipline: The an and practice of the learning organization. New York: Duubeday Currency.
  23. K. E. Watkins & V. J .Marsick. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
  24. K. E. Watkins & V. J. Marsick. (1996). Creating the Learning Organization: Twenty-two case studies from the real world of training. American Society for Training and Development. 288.
  25. K. B. Clark & T. Fujimoto. (1991). Product development. World Auto Industry: Strategy, Organization and Performance, 729-771.
  26. C. E. Helfat & R. Raubitschek. (2000). Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. In Tuck-JFE Contemporary Corporate Governance Conference.
  27. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano & A. Shuen. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
  28. G. T. M. Hult, R. F. Hurley & G. A. Knight. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial marketing management, 33(5), 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
  29. A. Rapp, K. J. Trainor & R. Agnihotri. (2010). Performance implications of customer-linking capabilities: Examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.002
  30. J. K. Kim & D. H. Ahn. (2017). Effects of the fitness among Entrepreneurship, Dynamic capabilities and Innovation activities on Business performance, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(1), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.1.163
  31. J. I. Chun & B. H. Lee. (2016). The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on International Performance of Korea Exporting SMEs: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism and Firm Type, Korean Academy Of International Business Management, 20(1), 45-74.
  32. Y. H. Huh & C. Lee. (2012). Determinants of Dynamic Capability and Its Relationships with Competitive Advantage and Performance in Foreign Markets, International Business Journal, 23(1), 33-73.
  33. S. I. Choi & S. B. Song, (2015). A Study on the Effect Business Performance of Convergence Capabilities on Corporate, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(1), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.177
  34. M. Aiken & J. Hage. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857100500105
  35. W. M. Cohen & D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
  36. S. A. Zahra & G. George. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  37. T. M. Egan, B. Yang & K. R. Bartlett. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human resource development quarterly, 15(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1104
  38. A. D. Ellinger, A. E. Ellinger, B. Yang & S. W. Howton. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human resource development quarterly, 13(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1010
  39. C. U. Ciborra & R. Andreu. (2001). Sharing knowledge across boundaries. Journal of Information technology, 16(2), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960110055103
  40. A. H. Gold & A. H. S. Arvind Malhotra. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669