Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.047

An Empirical Study on the Effect of Organic Structure and Learning Culture on Dynamic Competence and Corporate Performance  

Jung, Doo-Sig (Dept. of Advanced industry Fusion. Changwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.2, 2019 , pp. 47-57 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyze whether the organizational learning culture affects the firm's dynamic capacity and whether the dynamic capacity mediates the relationship between organizational learning culture and management performance. Respectively. First, "The more organizational structure is organic, the higher the integrated relocation capacity and learning capacity. Organizations with organic organizational structures were found to have the ability to successfully adapt to external changes because there is a practice that is not tied to formal processing or procedures. Second, it can be seen that there is a positive (+) influence on the relocation capacity among the dynamic competence of the learning culture of the corporate organization. Third, both sub-factors of dynamic competence have positive (+) influence on business performance. Also, there was no mediating effect of dynamic competence related to learning culture.
Keywords
Organizational structure; Learning culture; Dynamic competence; Mediating effect; Corporate performance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 C. E. Helfat & R. Raubitschek. (2000). Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. In Tuck-JFE Contemporary Corporate Governance Conference.
2 D. J. Teece, G. Pisano & A. Shuen. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
3 G. T. M. Hult, R. F. Hurley & G. A. Knight. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial marketing management, 33(5), 429-438.   DOI
4 A. Rapp, K. J. Trainor & R. Agnihotri. (2010). Performance implications of customer-linking capabilities: Examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1229-1236.   DOI
5 J. K. Kim & D. H. Ahn. (2017). Effects of the fitness among Entrepreneurship, Dynamic capabilities and Innovation activities on Business performance, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(1), 163-170.   DOI
6 J. I. Chun & B. H. Lee. (2016). The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on International Performance of Korea Exporting SMEs: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism and Firm Type, Korean Academy Of International Business Management, 20(1), 45-74.
7 Y. H. Huh & C. Lee. (2012). Determinants of Dynamic Capability and Its Relationships with Competitive Advantage and Performance in Foreign Markets, International Business Journal, 23(1), 33-73.
8 S. I. Choi & S. B. Song, (2015). A Study on the Effect Business Performance of Convergence Capabilities on Corporate, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(1), 177-184.   DOI
9 M. Aiken & J. Hage. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63-82.   DOI
10 W. M. Cohen & D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
11 J. Barney. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.   DOI
12 X. Wang, B. Yang & G. N. McLean. (2007). Influence of demographic factors and ownership type upon organizational learning culture in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(3), 154-165.   DOI
13 K. M. Elsenhardt & J. A. Martin. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(1), 1105-1121.   DOI
14 D. J. Teece. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovatio, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193-224.   DOI
15 E. Danneels. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic management journal, 23(12), 1095-1121.   DOI
16 M. Zollo & S. G. Winter. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.   DOI
17 W. Donaldson, T. M. Mackenzie & C. F. Underhill. (1996). A comparison of recollective memory and source monitoring. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(4), 486-490.   DOI
18 T. E. Burns & G. M. Stalker. (1961). The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
19 D. P. Slevin & J. G. Covin. (1997). Strategy formation patterns, performance, and the significance of context. Journal of Management, 23(2), 189-209..   DOI
20 J. M. Stopford & C. W. Baden-Fuller. (1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic management journal, 15(7), 521-536.   DOI
21 C. R. Schwenk & C. B. Shrader. (1993). Effects of formal strategic planning on financial performance in small firms: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 53-53.   DOI
22 C. U. Ciborra & R. Andreu. (2001). Sharing knowledge across boundaries. Journal of Information technology, 16(2), 73-81.   DOI
23 S. A. Zahra & G. George. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.   DOI
24 T. M. Egan, B. Yang & K. R. Bartlett. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human resource development quarterly, 15(3), 279-301.   DOI
25 A. D. Ellinger, A. E. Ellinger, B. Yang & S. W. Howton. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human resource development quarterly, 13(1), 5-22.   DOI
26 A. H. Gold & A. H. S. Arvind Malhotra. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214.   DOI
27 M. Pedler, J. Burgoyne & T. Boydell. (1991). The learning organisation, a strategy for sustainable development.
28 J. Dewey. (1993). How we think: A restatement of the reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath.
29 C. S. Argyris & DA. Schon. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
30 A. D. Garvin. (1993). Building a learning-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 109-122.   DOI
31 M. J. Marquardt & A. Reynolds. (1994). The global learning organization. McGraw-Hill.
32 M. Dodgson. (1993). Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization studies, 14(3), 375-394.   DOI
33 P. F. Drucker. (1993). Managing in turbulent times. Routledge.
34 K. E. Watkins & V. J. Marsick. (1996). Creating the Learning Organization: Twenty-two case studies from the real world of training. American Society for Training and Development. 288.
35 B. Yang, K. E. Watkins & V. J. Marsick. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55.   DOI
36 P. Senge. (1990). The fifth discipline: The an and practice of the learning organization. New York: Duubeday Currency.
37 K. E. Watkins & V. J .Marsick. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
38 K. B. Clark & T. Fujimoto. (1991). Product development. World Auto Industry: Strategy, Organization and Performance, 729-771.
39 A. Jashapara. (1993). The competitive learning organization: a quest for the Holy Grail. Management Decision, 31(8.).
40 M. Hammer. (2001), The superefficient company. Harvard business review, 79(8), 82-93.