Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Development of Climate Change Adaptation in Ecosystem Sector - Focused on Policy and Research Base in Major Countries -

생태분야 기후변화 적응의 흐름과 발전방향 - 국내외 정책 및 연구기반을 중심으로 -

  • 여인애 (국립생태원 융합연구실) ;
  • 홍승범 (국립생태원 융합연구실) ;
  • 박은진 (국립생태원 융합연구실)
  • Received : 2018.08.12
  • Accepted : 2019.01.22
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims at deriving the implications for adaptation policy and research target regarding climate change risk assessment in ecosystem sector in Korea. The common ground of exemplary cases of "world leaders" in terms of adaptation policies and researches was that they emphasize nationwide study on climate change on biodiversity and ecosystem in target of establishing scientific evidence-bases and reducing uncertainty for their national adaptation policies and plans. In light of this trend, Korean government should settle down more successful adaptation structure by leading adaptation system in further national policy-settings to observe UNFCCC and CBD integratedly and effectively, considering the economic value of adaptation in policy, and strengthening scientific research programs and technology developments. Moreover, risks assessment based on diagnoses and analysis on the risk factors (hazard, exposure, and vulnerability) for climate change in nationwide habitats and species and consolidations with subsequent adaptation strategies could make adaptations in ecosystem sector more effective and successful.

본 연구에서는 국가 생태분야 기후변화 리스크 평가와 연계한 적응 정책 및 연구의 방향성에 대한 시사점을 마련하고자 하였다. 본 논문에서 검토한 적응 정책과 연구에 대한 해외 모범사례의 공통점은 국가 적응정책 수립 시 과학적 근거기반 구축 및 불확실성 저감을 목표로 국가단위에서 기후변화가 생물다양성과 생태계에 미치는 영향 연구를 강조한다는 점이다. 이에 비추어 추후 국가 정책 마련 시 기후변화 협약과 생물다양성 협약 등 효율적 통합적 준수를 위한 적응체계를 유도하고, 적응의 경제적 가치평가를 통한 정책 반영, 과학적 연구 프로그램 강화 및 기술 개발의 측면을 보강하여 보다 성공적인 국가적응 정책 구조를 정착해 갈 수 있어야 할 것이다. 특히 생태계 분야 적응방안이 보다 실효성 있게 실행되기 위해서는 우리나라 서식지 및 종의 기후변화 리스크 요소(위해, 노출, 취약성)에 대한 과학적 진단과 분석을 바탕으로 리스크를 평가하고 이에 대한 적응방안을 통합하여 고민하는 노력이 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Concept of adaptation stated in IPCC report (Yeo et al., 2017)

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Concept and range of climate change adaptation in ecosystem sector-The concept applied in ecosystem sector in Climate Change Adaptation Manual published by UK Natural England (Yeo et al., 2017)

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Exemplary linkage between nationwide policy and CBD-U.K. Biodiversity Action Plan (Yeo et al., 2017)

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Biodiversity adaptation toolbox of AdaptARM Source: https://adaptnrm.csiro.au/ biodiversity-options/the-biodiversity-adaptation-toolbox/

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Current status for establishing adaptation plans in USA Source: https://nca2014.globalchange.gov

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6. Domestic legal and policy system regarding climate change adaptation strategies in Korea

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 7. National plans and research regarding ecosystem sector in Korea

Table 1. International conventions or directives considered in climate change adaptation of ecosystem sector in UK

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Adaptation strategies for climate change risk assessment in UK

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Major considerations for adaptation in level of details

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Major considerations for adaptation in level of details

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_1_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Alderman R, Hobday AJ. 2017. Developing a climate adaptation strategy for vulnerable seabirds based on prioritisation of intervention options. Deep-Sea Res II. 140: 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.07.003
  2. Cabral P, Levrel H, Schoenn J, Thiebaut E, Le Mao P, Mongruel R, Rollet C, Dedieu K, Carrier S, Morisseau F, Daures F. 2015. Marine habitats ecosystem service potential: A vulnerability approach in the Normand- Breton (Saint Malo) Gulf, France. Ecosyst Serv. 16: 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.007
  3. CBD [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/
  4. Chen Q, Liu J, Ho KC, Yang Z. 2012. Development of a relative risk model for evaluating ecological risk of water environment in the Haihe River Basin estuary area. Sci Total Environ. 420: 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.044
  5. Committee on Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation of Japan. 2010. Approaches to climate change adaptation.
  6. Committee on Climate Change. 2017. UK climate change risk assessment evidence report.
  7. Committee on Green Growth. 2009. National strategy of green growth and 5 year plan. [Korean Literature]
  8. Commonwealth of Australia. 2009. Climate change risks to Australia's Coast-a first pass national assessment.
  9. Defra(Willows R, Connell R). 2003. Climate adaptation: Risk, uncertainty and decisionmaking. UKCIP.
  10. Defra. 2012. Climate change risk assessment for the biodiversity and ecosystem services sector.
  11. Defra. 2017. UK climate change risk assessment: Evidence Report.
  12. European Climate Adaptation Platform [Internet]. Available from: http://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu
  13. Federal Environment Agency of Germany. 2015. Germany's vulnerability to climate change.
  14. Federal Ministry for the Environment of Germany: Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. 2009. Combating climate change-the german adaptation strategy.
  15. Federal Cabinet of Germany. 2011. Adaptation action plan of the German strategy for adaptation to climate change.
  16. Federal Environment Agency of Germany. 2015. Germany's vulnerability to climate change.
  17. Feenstra JF, Burton I, Smith JB, Tol RSJ. 1998. Handbook on methods for climate change impact assessment and adaptation strategies.
  18. Helping Biodiversity Adapt of Australian AdartNRM [Internet]. Available from: http://adaptnrm.csiro.au/biodiversityoptions/
  19. IPCC. Assessment Report 5-Working Group 2. 2014. Phase 1 Report Launch.
  20. Japan Cabinet. 2015. National plan for adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
  21. Joint Nature Conservation Committee [Internet]. Available from: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/
  22. Korea Environment Institute(Yoo and Kim). 2008. Development and application strategy on index of climate change vulnerability assessment. [Korean Literature]
  23. Korea Environment Institute(Chae et al). 2013a. Analysis on risk factors and management plan for minimizing national risks in sector. [Korean Literature]
  24. Korea Environment Institute(Lee et al). 2013b. A study on response plan to climate change risk in Korea for coping with global adaptation strategies. [Korean Literature]
  25. Korea Environment Institute(Park et al). 2014. Prospect for climate environment risk and national strategy(I). [Korean Literature]
  26. Korea Environment Institute(Cho et al.). 2014. Study on quantifying risk of the effects of climate change 1. [Korean Literature]
  27. Korea Environment Institute(Park et al). 2014. A study on the second national adaptation strategy to climate change. [Korean Literature]
  28. Korea Environment Institute(Chae et al). 2016. Developing climate change combat capability assessment framework. [Korean Literature]
  29. Mawdsley JR, O’Malley R, Ojima DS. 2009. A review of climate change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol. 23: 1080-1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01264.x
  30. Ministry of the Environment in Korea. 2003. Comprehensive plan for combating climate change in environment sector. [Korean Literature]
  31. Ministry of the Environment in Korea. 2005. The third response plan for climate change convention. [Korean Literature]
  32. Ministry of the Environment in Korea. 2010. Research on basic plan for national climate change adaptation supported by Framework Act on Low Carbon.Green Growth(2011- 2015). [Korean Literature]
  33. Ministry of Environment in Korea. 2011. Study on vulnerability due to climate change for supporting pilot development of specific adaptation action plan in lower level local government. [Korean Literature]
  34. Ministry of the Environment of Japan. 2015. Climate change impact assessment and national adaptation planning process in Japan. Government of Japan.
  35. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. 2016. Basic concept of climate change adaptation on biodiversity in Japan.
  36. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. 2012. The national biodiversity strategy of Japan 2012-2020: Road map towards the establishment of an enriching society in harmony with nature.
  37. National Institute of Ecology(Yeo et al). 2017. Climate adaptation in Ecosystem sector - Current and future development in adaptation strategy for biodiversity in the advanced countries. [Korean Literature]
  38. National Environmental Science Programme of Australia [Internet]. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/science/nesp
  39. Natural England. 2015. Climate change adaptation manual evidence to support nature conservation in a changing climate.
  40. Planning Office for Climate Change in Korea. 2002. The second comprehensive response strategy for UNFCCC. [Korean Literature]
  41. Planning Office for Climate Change in Korea. 2007. The forth climate change response plan. [Korean Literature]
  42. Planning Office for Climate Change in Korea. 2008. Comprehensive plan for combating climate change. [Korean Literature]
  43. Presidential commission on sustainable development in Korea. 2006. Strategy on national sustainable development and implication plan. [Korean Literature]
  44. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2008. Comprehensive climate change adaptation plan. [Korean Literature]
  45. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2010. The first national plan for climate change adaptation measures followed by the implementation of Framework Act on Low Carbon, Green Growth. [Korean Literature]
  46. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2014. The second national plan for green growth. [Korean Literature]
  47. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2015. The second national plan for climate change adaptation measures 2016-2020. [Korean Literature]
  48. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2016. The first basic plan for climate change response 2017-2036. [Korean Literature]
  49. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2016. The third plan for sustainable development 2016-2035. [Korean Literature]
  50. Relevant government ministries in Korea. 2017. Action plan for national biodiversity strategy 2017. [Korean Literature]
  51. Okey TA, Agbayani S, Alidina HM. 2015. Mapping ecological vulnerability to recent climate change in Canada’s Pacific marine ecosystems. Ocean Coast Manag. 106: 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.009
  52. Samhouri JF, Levin PS. 2012. Linking land- and seabased activities to risk in coastal ecosystems. Biol Conserv. 145: 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.021
  53. Sample JE, Baber I, Badger R. 2016. A spatially distributed risk screening tool to assess climate and land use change impacts on water-related ecosystem services. Environ Model Softw. 83: 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.05.011
  54. Southern Metropolitan Regional Council of Australian Government. 2009. Climate change risk management and adaptation action plan for the Southern Metropolitan Councils.
  55. Stelzenmuller V, Ellis JR, Rogers SI. 2010. Towards a spatially explicit risk assessment for marine management: Assessing the vulnerability of fish to aggregate extraction. Biol Conserv. 143: 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.007
  56. Summit Enterprises International Inc in Canada. 2014. Canadian climate change risk assessment guide: A strategic overview of climate risks and their impact on organizations.
  57. The Federal Government of Germany. 2008. German strategy for adaptation to climate change.
  58. UNFCCC. 1997. Kyoto Protocol.
  59. UNFCCC [Internet]. Available from: http://unfccc.int
  60. United States Agency for International Development. 2015. Integrating climate change adaptation into biodiversity and forestry programming.
  61. UN SGDs [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment
  62. Watson JEM, Rao M, Ai-Li K, Yan X. 2012. Climate Change Adaptation Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: A Review. Adv Clim Change Res. 3: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2012.00001
  63. Webster MS, Colton MA, Darling ES, Armstrong J, Pinsky ML, Knowlton N, Schindler DE. 2017. Who should pick the winners of climate change?. Cellpress Trends Ecol Evol. 32: 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.007
  64. Xu Y, Shen ZH, Ying LX, Ciais P, Liu HY, Piao SL, Wen C, Jiang YX. 2016. The exposure, sensitivity and vulnerability of natural vegetation in China to climate thermal variability (1901-2013): An indicator-based approach. Ecol Indic. 63: 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.023