Education of Primary School Mathematics (한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problems and Improvements in the Use of Grid Paper in Elementary Mathematics Textbooks

초등 수학 교과서에서 모눈종이 활용에 대한 문제점과 개선방향

  • Received : 2018.12.19
  • Accepted : 2019.01.04
  • Published : 2019.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The use of grid paper in elementary mathematics textbooks is used in numbers and calculations, figures and measurement areas. Among them, it is used most in the figure area. In spite of this utilization, it is necessary to supplement it because it is difficult to revise or supplement the trial and error that often occurs in the course of the course, as the process of using the textbook paper in the actual class. The use of grid paper in elementary mathematics textbooks is used in numbers and calculations, figures and measurement areas. Among them, it is used most in the figure area. In spite of this utilization, it is necessary to supplement it because it is difficult to revise or supplement the trial and error that often occurs in the course of the course, as the process of using the textbook paper in the actual class. In this study, we tried to find out the usability of grid paper boards which can be used more effectively than the grid paper among the teaching aids presented in the 'Development of teaching aids standards for math class' of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity(2017). A questionnaire survey was conducted on the use of grid paper and grid paper board for teachers who actually use grid paper in elementary mathematics. As a result, we found out the achievement criteria of grid paper board utilization and investigated the study subject which is effective to use grid paper board. In particular, we have identified specific learning topics that are effective in each area and presented specific activities.

초등 수학 교과서에서 모눈종이의 활용은 수와 연산, 도형, 측정 영역에서 사용하고, 이 중에서 도형 영역에서 가장 많이 사용하고 있다. 이러한 사용에도 불구하고 실제 초등 수학 교과서의 모눈종이를 활용한 수업 과정을 보면 모눈종이 사용에 따른 시행착오의 수정이나 보완이 어려워서 보다 효과적인 방안이 필요해보였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 한국과학창의재단(2017)의 '수학 수업용 교구 표준안'에서 제시한 교구 중에서 모눈종이보다 더 효과적인 모눈종이판 교구의 활용성을 설문 조사 하였다. 조사는 초등 수학 교과서에서 모눈종이를 활용하고 있는 차시별 학습주제 중에서 모눈종이와 모눈종이판에서 어느 것이 더 효과적인지를 교사들에게 조사한 후, 모눈종이판의 활용이 더 효과적인 학습주제의 성취기준을 찾아 분석하고, 영역별로 가장 효과적인 학습 주제의 구체적인 활동 과정을 제시하였다.

Keywords

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_f0001.png 이미지

[그림 1] 모눈종이판과 반투명모눈판 [Fig. 1] Grid paper board and semi-transparency grid board

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_f0002.png 이미지

[그림 2] $\frac{2}{3}{\times}\frac{3}{4}$ 곱셈 그림 [Fig. 1] $\frac{2}{3}{\times}\frac{3}{4}$ multiplication picture

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_f0003.png 이미지

[그림 3] 평면도형 뒤집어 보기 [Fig. 3] Plane figure flip

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_f0004.png 이미지

[그림 4] 선대칭 도형과 그 성질 알아보기 [Fig. 4] Learn the line symmetry shapes and their properties.

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_f0005.png 이미지

[그림 5] 평행사변형 넓이 구하기 [Fig. 5] Obtaining the parallelogram area

[표 1] 수와 연산 영역의 설문 결과 분석표 [Table 1] An analysis of the survey results of number and calculation area

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_t0001.png 이미지

[표 2-1] 도형 영역(3-4학년군)의 설문조사 결과 분석표 [Table 2-1] An analysis of the survey results of the figure area (grades 3-4)

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_t0002.png 이미지

[표 2-2] 도형 영역(5-6학년군)의 설문조사 결과 분석표 [Table 2-2] An analysis of the survey results of the figure area (grades 5-6)

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_t0003.png 이미지

[표 3] 측정 영역의 설문조사 결과 분석표 [Table 3] An analysis of the survey results of the measure area(grades 5-6)

SHGHD@_2019_v22n1_13_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Kang,W., & Baek,S,Y(2002). Elementary Mathematics Education. Seou: Dongmyoungsa.
  2. Ministry of Education(2015a). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education.
  3. Ministry of Education(2015b). The second comprehensive plan for mathematics education. Ministry of Education.
  4. Ministry of Education(2016). Presentation of the results of international comparison study (TIMSS 2015), Ministry of Education.
  5. Ministry of Education(2017a). Mathematics textbooks, guidance for 1st and 2nd graders in elementary school. Ministry of Education. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  6. Ministry of Education(2017b). Guidance on the revision and application of the mathematics instruction standard(official documents of city and provincial office of education). Ministry of Education.
  7. Ministry of Education(2018a). Mathematics 1-1. 1-2. 2-1. 2-2. 3-1. 3-2. 4-1. 4-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  8. Ministry of Education(2018b). Mathematics guidance (on-site review and inspection) 5-2. 6-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  9. National Korean Language Institute (http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/)
  10. Kim, N. H. (1999a). The basic structure of mathematics and dienes blocks, School Mathematics, 1(1), 305-324.
  11. Kim, N. H. (1999b). The use of quiznair bars in school mathematics learning, School Mathematics, 1(2), 699-721.
  12. Kim, M. K. (2005). Specific manipulation activities using pattern blocks - focused on fractional learning-The Korean Mathematical Society's Series A, 44(1), 125-141.
  13. Kim, E. T. et al (1996). Introduction to mathematics education. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  14. Kim, J. H. (2000). A Study on the Refinement of the Principles of Mathematics. A master's degree from Incheon National University of Education.
  15. Kim, H. k., & Park, S. H. (2006). Utilization of Pre-Research Study for the Use of Parishes in Primary Mathematics. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 20(2), 179-205.
  16. Na, G. S. (2002). Research Report RRC 2002-4-3, Elementary school mathematics professor, sample case book, KICE.
  17. Nam, S. I. (2003). A study on the using of manipulative material in the elementary school mathematics education: Based on tangram. Thesis Collection of Daegu National University of Education, 38, 109-134.
  18. Nam, E. W. et al. (1987). Educational Dictionary. History of Education Science.
  19. Ryu, S. M. & Park, Y. H. (2007). A study on the uses and the activation plan for the manipulative material in elementary mathematics. Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum Institution, 11(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2007.11.1.15
  20. Park, K. S. 2013). Back to math terms. Math love. 87-88.
  21. Park, M. G. (2016). Analysis of the Meaning and Usage of Diocese in Elementary Mathematics Classes from the Perspective of Pre-service Teachers. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 19(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2016.19.1.61
  22. Park, E. R., et al. (1976). Math dictionary. Seoul: Changwon Corporation.
  23. Seoul National University of Education (1995). Education dictionary. Baeyoungsa.
  24. Son, S. H. (2000). Effects of Club Activities on Students 'Mathematical inclination and ability to learn shapes from the Department of Mathematics. A master's degree from Daegu National University of Education.
  25. Ahn, B. G. (2003). A Study on the Use of Activity-Based Teaching and Learning Materials in Elementary School Mathematics. School Mathematics, 5(2), 241-257.
  26. Lee, K. H., Kang. W., Chung, H. Y., Ahn, B. Y. & Baek, D. Y. (2017). Development of Pedagogical Principles and Standards for Mathematics Teaching. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(2), 203-222.
  27. Cho, B. (1999). Teaching method for the new age. The Korean Society for Applied Mathematics Education , 15(4), 28-35.
  28. Choi, E .J. & Choi, C. W. (2009). Case Studies on the Use of Parishiones in Primary mathematics lessons, Journal of Korean Elementary School Education, 13(1), 31-49.
  29. Kofac(2017). Development of paradigm standard for mathematics class. Kofac.
  30. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belkapp Press.
  31. Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. Hutchinson Educational.
  32. Piaget, J. (1971). The psychology of intelligence. Boston: Routledge and Kegan.
  33. Remillard, J. T. & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM 46(5), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
  34. Revuz, A. (1971). The Position of Geometry in Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, No.4, pp.48-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305796
  35. Spikell, M. A. (1993). Teaching Mathematics with Manipulatives: A Resource of Activities for the K-12 Teacher. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA 02116.